Approximation of function using generalized Zygmund class

Abstract In this paper we review some of the previous work done by the earlier authors (Singh et al. in J. Inequal. Appl. 2017:101, 2017; Lal and Shireen in Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 5(4):1–13, 2013), etc., on error approximation of a function g in the generalized Zygmund space and resolve the issue o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. K. Nigam, Mohammad Mursaleen, Supriya Rani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-01-01
Series:Advances in Difference Equations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03197-5
_version_ 1818728426041769984
author H. K. Nigam
Mohammad Mursaleen
Supriya Rani
author_facet H. K. Nigam
Mohammad Mursaleen
Supriya Rani
author_sort H. K. Nigam
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In this paper we review some of the previous work done by the earlier authors (Singh et al. in J. Inequal. Appl. 2017:101, 2017; Lal and Shireen in Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 5(4):1–13, 2013), etc., on error approximation of a function g in the generalized Zygmund space and resolve the issue of these works. We also determine the best error approximation of the functions g and g ′ $g^{\prime }$ , where g ′ $g^{\prime }$ is a derived function of a 2π-periodic function g, in the generalized Zygmund class X z ( η ) $X_{z}^{(\eta )}$ , z ≥ 1 $z\geq 1$ , using matrix-Cesàro ( T C δ ) $(TC^{\delta })$ means of its Fourier series and its derived Fourier series, respectively. Theorem 2.1 of the present paper generalizes eight earlier results, which become its particular cases. Thus, the results of (Dhakal in Int. Math. Forum 5(35):1729–1735, 2010; Dhakal in Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2(3):1–15, 2013; Nigam in Surv. Math. Appl. 5:113–122, 2010; Nigam in Commun. Appl. Anal. 14(4):607–614, 2010; Nigam and Sharma in Kyungpook Math. J. 50:545–556, 2010; Nigam and Sharma in Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 70(6):775–784, 2011; Kushwaha and Dhakal in Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 14(2):117–122, 2013; Shrivastava et al. in IOSR J. Math. 10(1 Ver. I):39–41, 2014) become particular cases of our Theorem 2.1. Several corollaries are also deduced from our Theorem 2.1.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T22:29:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b5720bef28ee4c4dbf629df5d9ea43fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1687-1847
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T22:29:48Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Advances in Difference Equations
spelling doaj.art-b5720bef28ee4c4dbf629df5d9ea43fb2022-12-21T21:30:13ZengSpringerOpenAdvances in Difference Equations1687-18472021-01-012021112210.1186/s13662-020-03197-5Approximation of function using generalized Zygmund classH. K. Nigam0Mohammad Mursaleen1Supriya Rani2Department of Mathematics, Central University of South BiharDepartment of Mathematics, Aligarh Muslim UniversityDepartment of Mathematics, Central University of South BiharAbstract In this paper we review some of the previous work done by the earlier authors (Singh et al. in J. Inequal. Appl. 2017:101, 2017; Lal and Shireen in Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 5(4):1–13, 2013), etc., on error approximation of a function g in the generalized Zygmund space and resolve the issue of these works. We also determine the best error approximation of the functions g and g ′ $g^{\prime }$ , where g ′ $g^{\prime }$ is a derived function of a 2π-periodic function g, in the generalized Zygmund class X z ( η ) $X_{z}^{(\eta )}$ , z ≥ 1 $z\geq 1$ , using matrix-Cesàro ( T C δ ) $(TC^{\delta })$ means of its Fourier series and its derived Fourier series, respectively. Theorem 2.1 of the present paper generalizes eight earlier results, which become its particular cases. Thus, the results of (Dhakal in Int. Math. Forum 5(35):1729–1735, 2010; Dhakal in Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2(3):1–15, 2013; Nigam in Surv. Math. Appl. 5:113–122, 2010; Nigam in Commun. Appl. Anal. 14(4):607–614, 2010; Nigam and Sharma in Kyungpook Math. J. 50:545–556, 2010; Nigam and Sharma in Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. 70(6):775–784, 2011; Kushwaha and Dhakal in Nepal J. Sci. Technol. 14(2):117–122, 2013; Shrivastava et al. in IOSR J. Math. 10(1 Ver. I):39–41, 2014) become particular cases of our Theorem 2.1. Several corollaries are also deduced from our Theorem 2.1.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03197-5Generalized Minkowski inequality (GMI)Best approximationGeneralized Zygmund classMatrix ( T ) $(T)$ meansC δ $C^{\delta }$ meansMatrix-Cesàro (δ order) ( T C δ ) $(TC^{\delta })$
spellingShingle H. K. Nigam
Mohammad Mursaleen
Supriya Rani
Approximation of function using generalized Zygmund class
Advances in Difference Equations
Generalized Minkowski inequality (GMI)
Best approximation
Generalized Zygmund class
Matrix ( T ) $(T)$ means
C δ $C^{\delta }$ means
Matrix-Cesàro (δ order) ( T C δ ) $(TC^{\delta })$
title Approximation of function using generalized Zygmund class
title_full Approximation of function using generalized Zygmund class
title_fullStr Approximation of function using generalized Zygmund class
title_full_unstemmed Approximation of function using generalized Zygmund class
title_short Approximation of function using generalized Zygmund class
title_sort approximation of function using generalized zygmund class
topic Generalized Minkowski inequality (GMI)
Best approximation
Generalized Zygmund class
Matrix ( T ) $(T)$ means
C δ $C^{\delta }$ means
Matrix-Cesàro (δ order) ( T C δ ) $(TC^{\delta })$
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-020-03197-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hknigam approximationoffunctionusinggeneralizedzygmundclass
AT mohammadmursaleen approximationoffunctionusinggeneralizedzygmundclass
AT supriyarani approximationoffunctionusinggeneralizedzygmundclass