Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales?
Modern models that derive allometric relationships between metabolic rate and body mass are based on the architectural design of the cardiovascular system and presume sibling vessels are symmetric in terms of radius, length, flow rate, and pressure. Here, we study the cardiovascular structure of the...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-11-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5130167?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1830487729609113600 |
|---|---|
| author | Elif Tekin David Hunt Mitchell G Newberry Van M Savage |
| author_facet | Elif Tekin David Hunt Mitchell G Newberry Van M Savage |
| author_sort | Elif Tekin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Modern models that derive allometric relationships between metabolic rate and body mass are based on the architectural design of the cardiovascular system and presume sibling vessels are symmetric in terms of radius, length, flow rate, and pressure. Here, we study the cardiovascular structure of the human head and torso and of a mouse lung based on three-dimensional images processed via our software Angicart. In contrast to modern allometric theories, we find systematic patterns of asymmetry in vascular branching, potentially explaining previously documented mismatches between predictions (power-law or concave curvature) and observed empirical data (convex curvature) for the allometric scaling of metabolic rate. To examine why these systematic asymmetries in vascular branching might arise, we construct a mathematical framework to derive predictions based on local, junction-level optimality principles that have been proposed to be favored in the course of natural selection and development. The two most commonly used principles are material-cost optimizations (construction materials or blood volume) and optimization of efficient flow via minimization of power loss. We show that material-cost optimization solutions match with distributions for asymmetric branching across the whole network but do not match well for individual junctions. Consequently, we also explore random branching that is constrained at scales that range from local (junction-level) to global (whole network). We find that material-cost optimizations are the strongest predictor of vascular branching in the human head and torso, whereas locally or intermediately constrained random branching is comparable to material-cost optimizations for the mouse lung. These differences could be attributable to developmentally-programmed local branching for larger vessels and constrained random branching for smaller vessels. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T19:06:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b58ad1d470cb443095383710d56ffb1d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T19:06:46Z |
| publishDate | 2016-11-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS Computational Biology |
| spelling | doaj.art-b58ad1d470cb443095383710d56ffb1d2022-12-21T18:53:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582016-11-011211e100522310.1371/journal.pcbi.1005223Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales?Elif TekinDavid HuntMitchell G NewberryVan M SavageModern models that derive allometric relationships between metabolic rate and body mass are based on the architectural design of the cardiovascular system and presume sibling vessels are symmetric in terms of radius, length, flow rate, and pressure. Here, we study the cardiovascular structure of the human head and torso and of a mouse lung based on three-dimensional images processed via our software Angicart. In contrast to modern allometric theories, we find systematic patterns of asymmetry in vascular branching, potentially explaining previously documented mismatches between predictions (power-law or concave curvature) and observed empirical data (convex curvature) for the allometric scaling of metabolic rate. To examine why these systematic asymmetries in vascular branching might arise, we construct a mathematical framework to derive predictions based on local, junction-level optimality principles that have been proposed to be favored in the course of natural selection and development. The two most commonly used principles are material-cost optimizations (construction materials or blood volume) and optimization of efficient flow via minimization of power loss. We show that material-cost optimization solutions match with distributions for asymmetric branching across the whole network but do not match well for individual junctions. Consequently, we also explore random branching that is constrained at scales that range from local (junction-level) to global (whole network). We find that material-cost optimizations are the strongest predictor of vascular branching in the human head and torso, whereas locally or intermediately constrained random branching is comparable to material-cost optimizations for the mouse lung. These differences could be attributable to developmentally-programmed local branching for larger vessels and constrained random branching for smaller vessels.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5130167?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Elif Tekin David Hunt Mitchell G Newberry Van M Savage Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales? PLoS Computational Biology |
| title | Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales? |
| title_full | Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales? |
| title_fullStr | Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales? |
| title_short | Do Vascular Networks Branch Optimally or Randomly across Spatial Scales? |
| title_sort | do vascular networks branch optimally or randomly across spatial scales |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5130167?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eliftekin dovascularnetworksbranchoptimallyorrandomlyacrossspatialscales AT davidhunt dovascularnetworksbranchoptimallyorrandomlyacrossspatialscales AT mitchellgnewberry dovascularnetworksbranchoptimallyorrandomlyacrossspatialscales AT vanmsavage dovascularnetworksbranchoptimallyorrandomlyacrossspatialscales |