| Summary: | Background and Objectives: Men’s health has been acknowledged as a
broad field that comprises not only of male specific diseases, but involves
widely differing disciplines. While a significant number of studies have looked
into the definition of men’s health, there is a lack of concerted attempts to
collectively review the theories, models and frameworks in men’s health studies.
This paper presents an overview of theories, models and frameworks used in past
men’s health studies. Material and Methods: A scoping review was
conducted using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. Publications were searched in
three electronic databases. Two independent researchers performed publications’
selection and data charting. Any disagreement was resolved by consultation with
a third researcher. Results: One hundred and forty publications were
included in this review. Within these publications, 87 theories, models and
frameworks were identified. They were found to be generic to either health
sciences or social sciences, or specific to men’s health. Three type of processes
were observed among the theories, models and frameworks, namely, behavioural,
cognitive and gender processes. The findings also indicated a lack of
publications about theories, models and frameworks in men’s health studies from
developing countries and outside the western world. Conclusion: The
results revealed the multidisciplinary nature of men’s health. However, due to
the fragmentation of theoretical understanding by separate disciplines, an
interdisciplinary approach is necessary for this field.
|
|---|