Correction to: Does the EVA valuation model explain the market value of equity better under changing required return than constant required return?
After publication of this article [1], it is reported this article contained an error in the section ‘Risk-free return (rf)’
Main Author: | Sujata Behera |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Financial Innovation |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40854-020-00183-4 |
Similar Items
-
Does the EVA valuation model explain the market value of equity better under changing required return than constant required return?
by: Sujata Behera
Published: (2020-02-01) -
DETERMINE REQUIREMENTS FOR RETURN ON EQUITY OF INNOVATIVE-INVESTMENT PROJECT
by: Y. S. Potashnik, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Book-to-Market Ratio, return on equity and Brazilian Stock Returns
by: Rebeca Cordeiro da Cunha Araújo, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Does EVA Have More Information Content with Stock Return than Profitability Ratios? Evidence from Malaysia
by: Habibollah Nakhaei
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Does Innovation Explain the Skewness of Stock Returns?
by: Ahmed Baig, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)