Salience factors determining natural metonymic clippings illustrated through the medical lexicon

After briefly reviewing the cognitive-linguistic notions of metonymy and constructional form adhered to by the author (A) and discussing the general grammatical notion of clipping and A’s notion of “natural metonymic clipping”, the paper presents the list of salience factors whose combination determ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antonio Barcelona Sánchez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 2017-01-01
Series:Ibérica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/143
_version_ 1797953682118017024
author Antonio Barcelona Sánchez
author_facet Antonio Barcelona Sánchez
author_sort Antonio Barcelona Sánchez
collection DOAJ
description After briefly reviewing the cognitive-linguistic notions of metonymy and constructional form adhered to by the author (A) and discussing the general grammatical notion of clipping and A’s notion of “natural metonymic clipping”, the paper presents the list of salience factors whose combination determines the overall relative salience of a word segment. Two well-known inventories of American English medical abbreviations are then analyzed with the goal of identifying natural metonymic clippings in this register, noting their scarcity. A sample of three word segments that have become conventional medical clippings (tab- for tablet, -lytes for Electrolytes, and Chem panel for Chemistry panel) and a segment of one of the original full forms that has not become a conventional clipping (-blet in tablet) is then selected with the purpose of testing A’s salience factor grid on it. This grid is carefully described, including its numerical values, and systematically applied to the above-mentioned sample. The application of the grid to the sample seems to explain to a large extent the selection of the segments conventionalized as clippings in the sample, especially if compared to other “rival” segments. These results seem to confirm A’s earlier work arguing for the validity of the salience factor grid as a tool to account for the overall relative salience of a word segment and its (non) conventionalization as a natural metonymic clipping
first_indexed 2024-04-10T23:07:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b592138f0deb41e1b49e69bb97b3c504
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1139-7241
2340-2784
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T23:07:04Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos
record_format Article
series Ibérica
spelling doaj.art-b592138f0deb41e1b49e69bb97b3c5042023-01-13T10:56:50ZengAsociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines EspecíficosIbérica1139-72412340-27842017-01-0134Salience factors determining natural metonymic clippings illustrated through the medical lexiconAntonio Barcelona Sánchez0Universidad de CórdobaAfter briefly reviewing the cognitive-linguistic notions of metonymy and constructional form adhered to by the author (A) and discussing the general grammatical notion of clipping and A’s notion of “natural metonymic clipping”, the paper presents the list of salience factors whose combination determines the overall relative salience of a word segment. Two well-known inventories of American English medical abbreviations are then analyzed with the goal of identifying natural metonymic clippings in this register, noting their scarcity. A sample of three word segments that have become conventional medical clippings (tab- for tablet, -lytes for Electrolytes, and Chem panel for Chemistry panel) and a segment of one of the original full forms that has not become a conventional clipping (-blet in tablet) is then selected with the purpose of testing A’s salience factor grid on it. This grid is carefully described, including its numerical values, and systematically applied to the above-mentioned sample. The application of the grid to the sample seems to explain to a large extent the selection of the segments conventionalized as clippings in the sample, especially if compared to other “rival” segments. These results seem to confirm A’s earlier work arguing for the validity of the salience factor grid as a tool to account for the overall relative salience of a word segment and its (non) conventionalization as a natural metonymic clippinghttps://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/143lexical morphology metonymy linguistic motivation medical discourse clippingmorfología léxica
spellingShingle Antonio Barcelona Sánchez
Salience factors determining natural metonymic clippings illustrated through the medical lexicon
Ibérica
lexical morphology
metonymy
linguistic motivation
medical discourse
clipping
morfología léxica
title Salience factors determining natural metonymic clippings illustrated through the medical lexicon
title_full Salience factors determining natural metonymic clippings illustrated through the medical lexicon
title_fullStr Salience factors determining natural metonymic clippings illustrated through the medical lexicon
title_full_unstemmed Salience factors determining natural metonymic clippings illustrated through the medical lexicon
title_short Salience factors determining natural metonymic clippings illustrated through the medical lexicon
title_sort salience factors determining natural metonymic clippings illustrated through the medical lexicon
topic lexical morphology
metonymy
linguistic motivation
medical discourse
clipping
morfología léxica
url https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/143
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniobarcelonasanchez saliencefactorsdeterminingnaturalmetonymicclippingsillustratedthroughthemedicallexicon