Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence

Abstract Background Maternal mortality remains a major international health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and most could have been prevented by quality improvement interventions already demonstrated to be effective, such as clinical guideline implementation strategies. The aim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Stokes, Elizabeth J. Shaw, Janette Camosso-Stefinovic, Mari Imamura, Lovney Kanguru, Julia Hussein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2016-10-01
Series:Implementation Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-016-0508-1
_version_ 1811269456217767936
author Tim Stokes
Elizabeth J. Shaw
Janette Camosso-Stefinovic
Mari Imamura
Lovney Kanguru
Julia Hussein
author_facet Tim Stokes
Elizabeth J. Shaw
Janette Camosso-Stefinovic
Mari Imamura
Lovney Kanguru
Julia Hussein
author_sort Tim Stokes
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Maternal mortality remains a major international health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and most could have been prevented by quality improvement interventions already demonstrated to be effective, such as clinical guideline implementation strategies. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise qualitative evidence on guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in LMIC in order to identify barriers and enablers to their successful implementation. Methods We searched MEDLINE and CINAHL databases for articles reporting research findings on barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies in obstetric care practice in LMIC. We conducted a “best fit” framework synthesis of the included studies. We used an organisational “stages of change” model as our a priori framework for the synthesis. Results Nine studies were included: all were based in Sub-Saharan Africa and in hospital health care facilities. The majority of studies (seven) evaluated one particular guideline implementation strategy: clinical audit and feedback (both criterion-based audit and maternal death reviews), and a minority (two) evaluated educational interventions. A range of barriers and enablers to successful guideline implementation was identified. A key finding of the framework synthesis was that “high” and “low” intrinsic health care professional motivation are overall enablers and barriers, respectively, of successful guideline implementation. We developed a modified “stages of change” model to take account of these findings. Conclusion We have identified a number of quality improvement processes that are amenable to change at limited or no additional cost, although some identified barriers may be difficult to address without increased resources. We note the pathways to implementation may be complex and require further research to develop our understanding of individual and organisational behaviours and motivation in LMIC settings. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42015016062
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:42:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b59504aca3194c30ab374f0175f54cba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-5908
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:42:22Z
publishDate 2016-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Implementation Science
spelling doaj.art-b59504aca3194c30ab374f0175f54cba2022-12-22T03:15:44ZengBMCImplementation Science1748-59082016-10-0111111010.1186/s13012-016-0508-1Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidenceTim Stokes0Elizabeth J. Shaw1Janette Camosso-StefinovicMari Imamura2Lovney Kanguru3Julia Hussein4Department of General Practice and Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of OtagoNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)The Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of AberdeenThe Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of AberdeenThe Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of AberdeenAbstract Background Maternal mortality remains a major international health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and most could have been prevented by quality improvement interventions already demonstrated to be effective, such as clinical guideline implementation strategies. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise qualitative evidence on guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in LMIC in order to identify barriers and enablers to their successful implementation. Methods We searched MEDLINE and CINAHL databases for articles reporting research findings on barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies in obstetric care practice in LMIC. We conducted a “best fit” framework synthesis of the included studies. We used an organisational “stages of change” model as our a priori framework for the synthesis. Results Nine studies were included: all were based in Sub-Saharan Africa and in hospital health care facilities. The majority of studies (seven) evaluated one particular guideline implementation strategy: clinical audit and feedback (both criterion-based audit and maternal death reviews), and a minority (two) evaluated educational interventions. A range of barriers and enablers to successful guideline implementation was identified. A key finding of the framework synthesis was that “high” and “low” intrinsic health care professional motivation are overall enablers and barriers, respectively, of successful guideline implementation. We developed a modified “stages of change” model to take account of these findings. Conclusion We have identified a number of quality improvement processes that are amenable to change at limited or no additional cost, although some identified barriers may be difficult to address without increased resources. We note the pathways to implementation may be complex and require further research to develop our understanding of individual and organisational behaviours and motivation in LMIC settings. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42015016062http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-016-0508-1Systematic reviewQualitative synthesisFramework synthesisGuideline implementationObstetricsLow- and middle-income countries
spellingShingle Tim Stokes
Elizabeth J. Shaw
Janette Camosso-Stefinovic
Mari Imamura
Lovney Kanguru
Julia Hussein
Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
Implementation Science
Systematic review
Qualitative synthesis
Framework synthesis
Guideline implementation
Obstetrics
Low- and middle-income countries
title Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_full Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_fullStr Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_short Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence
title_sort barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low and middle income countries a systematic review of qualitative evidence
topic Systematic review
Qualitative synthesis
Framework synthesis
Guideline implementation
Obstetrics
Low- and middle-income countries
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13012-016-0508-1
work_keys_str_mv AT timstokes barriersandenablerstoguidelineimplementationstrategiestoimproveobstetriccarepracticeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence
AT elizabethjshaw barriersandenablerstoguidelineimplementationstrategiestoimproveobstetriccarepracticeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence
AT janettecamossostefinovic barriersandenablerstoguidelineimplementationstrategiestoimproveobstetriccarepracticeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence
AT mariimamura barriersandenablerstoguidelineimplementationstrategiestoimproveobstetriccarepracticeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence
AT lovneykanguru barriersandenablerstoguidelineimplementationstrategiestoimproveobstetriccarepracticeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence
AT juliahussein barriersandenablerstoguidelineimplementationstrategiestoimproveobstetriccarepracticeinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewofqualitativeevidence