Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent
The aim of this paper is to highlight an interdependence between procedural and agential norms that undermines their neat separation when appraising argumentation. Drawing on the munāẓara tradition, we carve a space for sequencing in argumentation scholarship. Focusing on the antagonist’s sequencin...
Main Authors: | Rahmi Oruç, Mehmet Ali Üzelgün, Karim Sadek |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/7073 |
Similar Items
-
In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal
by: Andrew Aberdein
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Virtues Suffice for Argument Evaluation
by: Andrew Aberdein
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Reviewing Argument Schemes for Legal Arguments of Statutory Interpretation
by: Eduardo Brandão Nunes
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments
by: Michael Hoffmann, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Transformation of Vices to Virtues from the Perspective of Shi’ite and Sunni Commentators
by: Ali Reza Zakizadeh Renani, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01)