Artificial Intelligence and the Phenomenology of Flesh

A. M. Turing argued that there was "little point in trying to make a 'thinking machine' more human by dressing it up in ... artificial flesh." We should, instead, draw "a fairly sharp line between the physical and the intellectual capacities of a man." For over fifty ye...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Mensch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2006-11-01
Series:PhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
Online Access:https://phaenex.uwindsor.ca/index.php/phaenex/article/view/44
_version_ 1819225536986087424
author James Mensch
author_facet James Mensch
author_sort James Mensch
collection DOAJ
description A. M. Turing argued that there was "little point in trying to make a 'thinking machine' more human by dressing it up in ... artificial flesh." We should, instead, draw "a fairly sharp line between the physical and the intellectual capacities of a man." For over fifty years, drawing this line has meant disregarding the role flesh plays in our intellectual capacities. Correspondingly, intelligence has been defined in terms of the algorithms that both men and machines can perform. I would like to raise some doubts about this paradigm in artificial intelligence research. Intelligence, I believe, does not just involve the working of algorithms. It is founded on flesh's ability to move itself, to feel itself, and to engage in the body projects that accompanied our learning a language. This implies that to copy intelligence -- i.e., to produce an artificial version of it -- the flesh that forms its basis must also be reproduced.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T10:11:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b5a0490650ef4f82ae4a6219fa6dc801
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1911-1576
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T10:11:10Z
publishDate 2006-11-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series PhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
spelling doaj.art-b5a0490650ef4f82ae4a6219fa6dc8012022-12-21T17:50:57ZengUniversity of WindsorPhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture1911-15762006-11-011110.22329/p.v1i1.44Artificial Intelligence and the Phenomenology of FleshJames MenschA. M. Turing argued that there was "little point in trying to make a 'thinking machine' more human by dressing it up in ... artificial flesh." We should, instead, draw "a fairly sharp line between the physical and the intellectual capacities of a man." For over fifty years, drawing this line has meant disregarding the role flesh plays in our intellectual capacities. Correspondingly, intelligence has been defined in terms of the algorithms that both men and machines can perform. I would like to raise some doubts about this paradigm in artificial intelligence research. Intelligence, I believe, does not just involve the working of algorithms. It is founded on flesh's ability to move itself, to feel itself, and to engage in the body projects that accompanied our learning a language. This implies that to copy intelligence -- i.e., to produce an artificial version of it -- the flesh that forms its basis must also be reproduced.https://phaenex.uwindsor.ca/index.php/phaenex/article/view/44
spellingShingle James Mensch
Artificial Intelligence and the Phenomenology of Flesh
PhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
title Artificial Intelligence and the Phenomenology of Flesh
title_full Artificial Intelligence and the Phenomenology of Flesh
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence and the Phenomenology of Flesh
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence and the Phenomenology of Flesh
title_short Artificial Intelligence and the Phenomenology of Flesh
title_sort artificial intelligence and the phenomenology of flesh
url https://phaenex.uwindsor.ca/index.php/phaenex/article/view/44
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesmensch artificialintelligenceandthephenomenologyofflesh