Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
BackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a well-established role in revascularization for coronary artery disease. We performed network meta-analysis to provide evidence on optimal intervention strategies for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries.Materials and methodsEnrolled stud...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-11-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833/full |
_version_ | 1811224950339534848 |
---|---|
author | Wen-Rui Ma Karthik H. Chandrasekharan Chang-Sheng Nai Yong-Xiang Zhu Javaid Iqbal Shang Chang You-Wei Cheng Xin-Yu Wang Christos V. Bourantas Yao-Jun Zhang |
author_facet | Wen-Rui Ma Karthik H. Chandrasekharan Chang-Sheng Nai Yong-Xiang Zhu Javaid Iqbal Shang Chang You-Wei Cheng Xin-Yu Wang Christos V. Bourantas Yao-Jun Zhang |
author_sort | Wen-Rui Ma |
collection | DOAJ |
description | BackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a well-established role in revascularization for coronary artery disease. We performed network meta-analysis to provide evidence on optimal intervention strategies for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries.Materials and methodsEnrolled studies were randomized clinical trials that compared different intervention strategies [balloon angioplasty (BA), biolimus-coated balloon (BCB), bare-metal stent (BMS), new-generation drug-eluting stent (New-DES), older generation sirolimus-eluting stent (Old-SES), paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB), and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES)] for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE).ResultsA total of 23 randomized clinical trials comparing seven intervention devices were analyzed. In terms of the primary outcome, New-DES was the intervention device with the best efficacy [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 89.1%; mean rank, 1.7], and the Old-SES [risk ratio (RR), 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–2.64] and PCB (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.72–2.74) secondary to New-DES, but there was no statistically significant difference between these three intervention devices. All DES and PCB were superior to BMS and BA for MACE in both primary and sensitivity analysis. For secondary outcomes, there was no association between all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) with any intervention strategy, and additionally, the findings of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were similar to the primary outcomes.ConclusionPaclitaxel-coated balloon yielded similar outcomes to New-DES for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. Therefore, this network meta-analysis may provide potential support for PCB as a feasible, effective, and safe alternative intervention strategy for the revascularization of small coronary arteries.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails], identifier [CRD42022338433]. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:57:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b5a5687b3b324fda84f491a20bb39e3e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2297-055X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T08:57:25Z |
publishDate | 2022-11-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-b5a5687b3b324fda84f491a20bb39e3e2022-12-22T03:39:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2022-11-01910.3389/fcvm.2022.10178331017833Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysisWen-Rui Ma0Karthik H. Chandrasekharan1Chang-Sheng Nai2Yong-Xiang Zhu3Javaid Iqbal4Shang Chang5You-Wei Cheng6Xin-Yu Wang7Christos V. Bourantas8Yao-Jun Zhang9Department of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People’s Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People’s Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People’s Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People’s Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People’s Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People’s Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Cardiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United KingdomDepartment of Cardiology, Xuzhou Third People’s Hospital, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, ChinaBackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has a well-established role in revascularization for coronary artery disease. We performed network meta-analysis to provide evidence on optimal intervention strategies for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries.Materials and methodsEnrolled studies were randomized clinical trials that compared different intervention strategies [balloon angioplasty (BA), biolimus-coated balloon (BCB), bare-metal stent (BMS), new-generation drug-eluting stent (New-DES), older generation sirolimus-eluting stent (Old-SES), paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB), and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES)] for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE).ResultsA total of 23 randomized clinical trials comparing seven intervention devices were analyzed. In terms of the primary outcome, New-DES was the intervention device with the best efficacy [surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 89.1%; mean rank, 1.7], and the Old-SES [risk ratio (RR), 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–2.64] and PCB (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.72–2.74) secondary to New-DES, but there was no statistically significant difference between these three intervention devices. All DES and PCB were superior to BMS and BA for MACE in both primary and sensitivity analysis. For secondary outcomes, there was no association between all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) with any intervention strategy, and additionally, the findings of target lesion revascularization (TLR) were similar to the primary outcomes.ConclusionPaclitaxel-coated balloon yielded similar outcomes to New-DES for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries. Therefore, this network meta-analysis may provide potential support for PCB as a feasible, effective, and safe alternative intervention strategy for the revascularization of small coronary arteries.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails], identifier [CRD42022338433].https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833/fullclinical outcomede novo lesionsdrug-coated balloonnew-generation drug-eluting stentsmall coronary arteries |
spellingShingle | Wen-Rui Ma Karthik H. Chandrasekharan Chang-Sheng Nai Yong-Xiang Zhu Javaid Iqbal Shang Chang You-Wei Cheng Xin-Yu Wang Christos V. Bourantas Yao-Jun Zhang Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine clinical outcome de novo lesions drug-coated balloon new-generation drug-eluting stent small coronary arteries |
title | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: A systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in small coronary arteries a systematic review and network meta analysis |
topic | clinical outcome de novo lesions drug-coated balloon new-generation drug-eluting stent small coronary arteries |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017833/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wenruima clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT karthikhchandrasekharan clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT changshengnai clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yongxiangzhu clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT javaidiqbal clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT shangchang clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT youweicheng clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xinyuwang clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT christosvbourantas clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yaojunzhang clinicaloutcomesofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionfordenovolesionsinsmallcoronaryarteriesasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |