Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective
Abstract Background Edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide are two innovative brain cytoprotective drugs from China that have been approved and widely prescribed for acute ischemic stroke, and the cost of the two drugs are partially paid by the Chinese medical insurance system. This study ai...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-02-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17959-3 |
_version_ | 1797272915348029440 |
---|---|
author | Jianchun Li Weihan Cao Fei Zhao Pengfei Jin |
author_facet | Jianchun Li Weihan Cao Fei Zhao Pengfei Jin |
author_sort | Jianchun Li |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide are two innovative brain cytoprotective drugs from China that have been approved and widely prescribed for acute ischemic stroke, and the cost of the two drugs are partially paid by the Chinese medical insurance system. This study aimed to investigate and compare the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke from the Chinese healthcare system’s perspective. Methods A model combining a short-term decision tree model with 90 days and a long-term Markov model with a life-time horizon (40 years) was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke over a lifetime horizon. Since the absence of a head-to-head clinical comparison of two therapies, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted by adjusting the patient characteristics using individual patient data from pivotal phase III trial of edaravone dexborneol and published aggregated data of dl-3-n-butylphthalide. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Utilities and costs (Chinese Yuan, CNY) were derived from publications and open-access database. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of results. Results Compared with patients in dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm, edaravone dexborneol arm was found to be cost-effective in 90 days and highly cost-effective as the study horizons extended. With a similar direct medical cost, patients in edaravone dexborneol arm slightly gained an additional 0.1615 QALYs in life-time. In the long term (40 years), patients in edaravone dexborneol arm and dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm yielded 8.0351 and 7.8736 QALYs with the overall direct medical cost of CNY 29,185.23 and CNY 29,940.28, respectively. The one-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was most sensitive to the price of edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide. Conclusion Edaravone dexborneol is a cost-effective alternative compared with dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke patients in current medical setting of China. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:36:09Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b5a5af3c37724a4e9c302f0cf5c75877 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2458 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:36:09Z |
publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Public Health |
spelling | doaj.art-b5a5af3c37724a4e9c302f0cf5c758772024-03-05T20:39:03ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582024-02-0124111010.1186/s12889-024-17959-3Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspectiveJianchun Li0Weihan Cao1Fei Zhao2Pengfei Jin3Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application (Beijing Hospital)Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application (Beijing Hospital)Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application (Beijing Hospital)Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application (Beijing Hospital)Abstract Background Edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide are two innovative brain cytoprotective drugs from China that have been approved and widely prescribed for acute ischemic stroke, and the cost of the two drugs are partially paid by the Chinese medical insurance system. This study aimed to investigate and compare the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke from the Chinese healthcare system’s perspective. Methods A model combining a short-term decision tree model with 90 days and a long-term Markov model with a life-time horizon (40 years) was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke over a lifetime horizon. Since the absence of a head-to-head clinical comparison of two therapies, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted by adjusting the patient characteristics using individual patient data from pivotal phase III trial of edaravone dexborneol and published aggregated data of dl-3-n-butylphthalide. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Utilities and costs (Chinese Yuan, CNY) were derived from publications and open-access database. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of results. Results Compared with patients in dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm, edaravone dexborneol arm was found to be cost-effective in 90 days and highly cost-effective as the study horizons extended. With a similar direct medical cost, patients in edaravone dexborneol arm slightly gained an additional 0.1615 QALYs in life-time. In the long term (40 years), patients in edaravone dexborneol arm and dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm yielded 8.0351 and 7.8736 QALYs with the overall direct medical cost of CNY 29,185.23 and CNY 29,940.28, respectively. The one-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was most sensitive to the price of edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide. Conclusion Edaravone dexborneol is a cost-effective alternative compared with dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke patients in current medical setting of China.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17959-3Cost-effectivenessAcute ischemic strokeEdaravone dexborneolDl-3-n-butylphthalideMatching-adjusted indirect comparison |
spellingShingle | Jianchun Li Weihan Cao Fei Zhao Pengfei Jin Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective BMC Public Health Cost-effectiveness Acute ischemic stroke Edaravone dexborneol Dl-3-n-butylphthalide Matching-adjusted indirect comparison |
title | Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective |
title_sort | cost effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl 3 n butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke a chinese health care perspective |
topic | Cost-effectiveness Acute ischemic stroke Edaravone dexborneol Dl-3-n-butylphthalide Matching-adjusted indirect comparison |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17959-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jianchunli costeffectivenessofedaravonedexborneolversusdl3nbutylphthalideforthetreatmentofacuteischemicstrokeachinesehealthcareperspective AT weihancao costeffectivenessofedaravonedexborneolversusdl3nbutylphthalideforthetreatmentofacuteischemicstrokeachinesehealthcareperspective AT feizhao costeffectivenessofedaravonedexborneolversusdl3nbutylphthalideforthetreatmentofacuteischemicstrokeachinesehealthcareperspective AT pengfeijin costeffectivenessofedaravonedexborneolversusdl3nbutylphthalideforthetreatmentofacuteischemicstrokeachinesehealthcareperspective |