Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective

Abstract Background Edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide are two innovative brain cytoprotective drugs from China that have been approved and widely prescribed for acute ischemic stroke, and the cost of the two drugs are partially paid by the Chinese medical insurance system. This study ai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianchun Li, Weihan Cao, Fei Zhao, Pengfei Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-02-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17959-3
_version_ 1797272915348029440
author Jianchun Li
Weihan Cao
Fei Zhao
Pengfei Jin
author_facet Jianchun Li
Weihan Cao
Fei Zhao
Pengfei Jin
author_sort Jianchun Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide are two innovative brain cytoprotective drugs from China that have been approved and widely prescribed for acute ischemic stroke, and the cost of the two drugs are partially paid by the Chinese medical insurance system. This study aimed to investigate and compare the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke from the Chinese healthcare system’s perspective. Methods A model combining a short-term decision tree model with 90 days and a long-term Markov model with a life-time horizon (40 years) was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke over a lifetime horizon. Since the absence of a head-to-head clinical comparison of two therapies, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted by adjusting the patient characteristics using individual patient data from pivotal phase III trial of edaravone dexborneol and published aggregated data of dl-3-n-butylphthalide. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Utilities and costs (Chinese Yuan, CNY) were derived from publications and open-access database. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of results. Results Compared with patients in dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm, edaravone dexborneol arm was found to be cost-effective in 90 days and highly cost-effective as the study horizons extended. With a similar direct medical cost, patients in edaravone dexborneol arm slightly gained an additional 0.1615 QALYs in life-time. In the long term (40 years), patients in edaravone dexborneol arm and dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm yielded 8.0351 and 7.8736 QALYs with the overall direct medical cost of CNY 29,185.23 and CNY 29,940.28, respectively. The one-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was most sensitive to the price of edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide. Conclusion Edaravone dexborneol is a cost-effective alternative compared with dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke patients in current medical setting of China.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:36:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b5a5af3c37724a4e9c302f0cf5c75877
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:36:09Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-b5a5af3c37724a4e9c302f0cf5c758772024-03-05T20:39:03ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582024-02-0124111010.1186/s12889-024-17959-3Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspectiveJianchun Li0Weihan Cao1Fei Zhao2Pengfei Jin3Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application (Beijing Hospital)Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application (Beijing Hospital)Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application (Beijing Hospital)Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine,Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Assessment of Clinical Drugs Risk and Individual Application (Beijing Hospital)Abstract Background Edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide are two innovative brain cytoprotective drugs from China that have been approved and widely prescribed for acute ischemic stroke, and the cost of the two drugs are partially paid by the Chinese medical insurance system. This study aimed to investigate and compare the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke from the Chinese healthcare system’s perspective. Methods A model combining a short-term decision tree model with 90 days and a long-term Markov model with a life-time horizon (40 years) was developed to simulate the cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke over a lifetime horizon. Since the absence of a head-to-head clinical comparison of two therapies, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted by adjusting the patient characteristics using individual patient data from pivotal phase III trial of edaravone dexborneol and published aggregated data of dl-3-n-butylphthalide. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Utilities and costs (Chinese Yuan, CNY) were derived from publications and open-access database. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of results. Results Compared with patients in dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm, edaravone dexborneol arm was found to be cost-effective in 90 days and highly cost-effective as the study horizons extended. With a similar direct medical cost, patients in edaravone dexborneol arm slightly gained an additional 0.1615 QALYs in life-time. In the long term (40 years), patients in edaravone dexborneol arm and dl-3-n-butylphthalide arm yielded 8.0351 and 7.8736 QALYs with the overall direct medical cost of CNY 29,185.23 and CNY 29,940.28, respectively. The one-way sensitivity analysis suggested that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was most sensitive to the price of edaravone dexborneol and dl-3-n-butylphthalide. Conclusion Edaravone dexborneol is a cost-effective alternative compared with dl-3-n-butylphthalide for acute ischemic stroke patients in current medical setting of China.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17959-3Cost-effectivenessAcute ischemic strokeEdaravone dexborneolDl-3-n-butylphthalideMatching-adjusted indirect comparison
spellingShingle Jianchun Li
Weihan Cao
Fei Zhao
Pengfei Jin
Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective
BMC Public Health
Cost-effectiveness
Acute ischemic stroke
Edaravone dexborneol
Dl-3-n-butylphthalide
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison
title Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective
title_full Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective
title_short Cost-effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl-3-n-butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke: a Chinese health care perspective
title_sort cost effectiveness of edaravone dexborneol versus dl 3 n butylphthalide for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke a chinese health care perspective
topic Cost-effectiveness
Acute ischemic stroke
Edaravone dexborneol
Dl-3-n-butylphthalide
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17959-3
work_keys_str_mv AT jianchunli costeffectivenessofedaravonedexborneolversusdl3nbutylphthalideforthetreatmentofacuteischemicstrokeachinesehealthcareperspective
AT weihancao costeffectivenessofedaravonedexborneolversusdl3nbutylphthalideforthetreatmentofacuteischemicstrokeachinesehealthcareperspective
AT feizhao costeffectivenessofedaravonedexborneolversusdl3nbutylphthalideforthetreatmentofacuteischemicstrokeachinesehealthcareperspective
AT pengfeijin costeffectivenessofedaravonedexborneolversusdl3nbutylphthalideforthetreatmentofacuteischemicstrokeachinesehealthcareperspective