RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is growing interest in realist synthesis as an alternative systematic review method. This approach offers the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas - for example, by explaining the success, failure or...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | BMC Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/21 |
| _version_ | 1811294264749981696 |
|---|---|
| author | Wong Geoff Greenhalgh Trish Westhorp Gill Buckingham Jeanette Pawson Ray |
| author_facet | Wong Geoff Greenhalgh Trish Westhorp Gill Buckingham Jeanette Pawson Ray |
| author_sort | Wong Geoff |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is growing interest in realist synthesis as an alternative systematic review method. This approach offers the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas - for example, by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. No previous publication standards exist for reporting realist syntheses. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project. The project's aim is to produce preliminary publication standards for realist systematic reviews.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We (a) collated and summarized existing literature on the principles of good practice in realist syntheses; (b) considered the extent to which these principles had been followed by published syntheses, thereby identifying how rigor may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; (c) used a three-round online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of national and international experts in evidence synthesis, realist research, policy and/or publishing to produce and iteratively refine a draft set of methodological steps and publication standards; (d) provided real-time support to ongoing realist syntheses and the open-access RAMESES online discussion list so as to capture problems and questions as they arose; and (e) synthesized expert input, evidence syntheses and real-time problem analysis into a definitive set of standards.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 35 published realist syntheses, provided real-time support to 9 on-going syntheses and captured questions raised in the RAMESES discussion list. Through analysis and discussion within the project team, we summarized the published literature and common questions and challenges into briefing materials for the Delphi panel, comprising 37 members. Within three rounds this panel had reached consensus on 19 key publication standards, with an overall response rate of 91%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This project used multiple sources to develop and draw together evidence and expertise in realist synthesis. For each item we have included an explanation for why it is important and guidance on how it might be reported. Realist synthesis is a relatively new method for evidence synthesis and as experience and methodological developments occur, we anticipate that these standards will evolve to reflect further methodological developments. We hope that these standards will act as a resource that will contribute to improving the reporting of realist syntheses.</p> <p>To encourage dissemination of the RAMESES publication standards, this article is co-published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing and is freely accessible on Wiley Online Library (<url>http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jan</url>).</p> <p>Please see related article <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/20</url> and <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/22</url></p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T05:15:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b5a7f724b49d4f55803cd95b5a65fc94 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1741-7015 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T05:15:00Z |
| publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-b5a7f724b49d4f55803cd95b5a65fc942022-12-22T03:00:55ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152013-01-011112110.1186/1741-7015-11-21RAMESES publication standards: realist synthesesWong GeoffGreenhalgh TrishWesthorp GillBuckingham JeanettePawson Ray<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>There is growing interest in realist synthesis as an alternative systematic review method. This approach offers the potential to expand the knowledge base in policy-relevant areas - for example, by explaining the success, failure or mixed fortunes of complex interventions. No previous publication standards exist for reporting realist syntheses. This standard was developed as part of the RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) project. The project's aim is to produce preliminary publication standards for realist systematic reviews.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We (a) collated and summarized existing literature on the principles of good practice in realist syntheses; (b) considered the extent to which these principles had been followed by published syntheses, thereby identifying how rigor may be lost and how existing methods could be improved; (c) used a three-round online Delphi method with an interdisciplinary panel of national and international experts in evidence synthesis, realist research, policy and/or publishing to produce and iteratively refine a draft set of methodological steps and publication standards; (d) provided real-time support to ongoing realist syntheses and the open-access RAMESES online discussion list so as to capture problems and questions as they arose; and (e) synthesized expert input, evidence syntheses and real-time problem analysis into a definitive set of standards.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We identified 35 published realist syntheses, provided real-time support to 9 on-going syntheses and captured questions raised in the RAMESES discussion list. Through analysis and discussion within the project team, we summarized the published literature and common questions and challenges into briefing materials for the Delphi panel, comprising 37 members. Within three rounds this panel had reached consensus on 19 key publication standards, with an overall response rate of 91%.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This project used multiple sources to develop and draw together evidence and expertise in realist synthesis. For each item we have included an explanation for why it is important and guidance on how it might be reported. Realist synthesis is a relatively new method for evidence synthesis and as experience and methodological developments occur, we anticipate that these standards will evolve to reflect further methodological developments. We hope that these standards will act as a resource that will contribute to improving the reporting of realist syntheses.</p> <p>To encourage dissemination of the RAMESES publication standards, this article is co-published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing and is freely accessible on Wiley Online Library (<url>http://www.wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/jan</url>).</p> <p>Please see related article <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/20</url> and <url>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/22</url></p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/21realist synthesisrealist reviewpublication standards |
| spellingShingle | Wong Geoff Greenhalgh Trish Westhorp Gill Buckingham Jeanette Pawson Ray RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses BMC Medicine realist synthesis realist review publication standards |
| title | RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses |
| title_full | RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses |
| title_fullStr | RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses |
| title_full_unstemmed | RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses |
| title_short | RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses |
| title_sort | rameses publication standards realist syntheses |
| topic | realist synthesis realist review publication standards |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/11/21 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wonggeoff ramesespublicationstandardsrealistsyntheses AT greenhalghtrish ramesespublicationstandardsrealistsyntheses AT westhorpgill ramesespublicationstandardsrealistsyntheses AT buckinghamjeanette ramesespublicationstandardsrealistsyntheses AT pawsonray ramesespublicationstandardsrealistsyntheses |