Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the measurements performed with digital manual (DM) cephalometric analysis and automatic cephalometric analysis obtained from an online artificial intelligence (AI) platform, according to different sagittal skeletal malocclusions. Methods: C...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Dental Press Editora
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400300&tlng=en |
| _version_ | 1828151715203907584 |
|---|---|
| author | Gökhan ÇOBAN Taner ÖZTÜRK Nizami HASHIMLI Ahmet YAĞCI |
| author_facet | Gökhan ÇOBAN Taner ÖZTÜRK Nizami HASHIMLI Ahmet YAĞCI |
| author_sort | Gökhan ÇOBAN |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the measurements performed with digital manual (DM) cephalometric analysis and automatic cephalometric analysis obtained from an online artificial intelligence (AI) platform, according to different sagittal skeletal malocclusions. Methods: Cephalometric radiographs of 105 randomly selected individuals (mean age: 17.25 ± 1.87 years) were included in this study. Dolphin Imaging software was used for DM cephalometric analysis, and the WebCeph platform was used for AI-based cephalometric analysis. In total, 10 linear and 12 angular measurements were evaluated. The paired t-test, one-way ANOVA test, and intraclass correlation coefficient tests were used to evaluate the differences between the two methods. The level of statistical significance was set at p< 0.05. Results: Except for SNB, NPog, U1.SN, U1.NA, L1-APog, I/I, and LLE parameters, all other parameters presented significant differences between the two methods (p< 0.05). While there was no difference (p> 0.05) in both SNA and SNB measurements between the two methods in the Class I malocclusion group, there was a difference between both methods in the Class II malocclusion group. Meanwhile, only the SNA in the Class III malocclusion group was different (p< 0.05). The ANB angle differed significantly in all three malocclusion groups. For both methods, all parameters except CoA and CoGn were found to have good correlation. Conclusion: Although significant differences were detected in some measurements between the two cephalometric analysis methods, not all differences were clinically significant. The AI-based cephalometric analysis method needs to be developed for more specific malocclusions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:01:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b5b47c840e564697a1f063c2c6b08df3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2177-6709 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:01:43Z |
| publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
| publisher | Dental Press Editora |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics |
| spelling | doaj.art-b5b47c840e564697a1f063c2c6b08df32022-12-22T04:00:56ZengDental Press EditoraDental Press Journal of Orthodontics2177-67092022-08-0127410.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e222112.oarComparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing softwareGökhan ÇOBANhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-005XTaner ÖZTÜRKhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-286XNizami HASHIMLIhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1195-1832Ahmet YAĞCIhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8962-8392ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the measurements performed with digital manual (DM) cephalometric analysis and automatic cephalometric analysis obtained from an online artificial intelligence (AI) platform, according to different sagittal skeletal malocclusions. Methods: Cephalometric radiographs of 105 randomly selected individuals (mean age: 17.25 ± 1.87 years) were included in this study. Dolphin Imaging software was used for DM cephalometric analysis, and the WebCeph platform was used for AI-based cephalometric analysis. In total, 10 linear and 12 angular measurements were evaluated. The paired t-test, one-way ANOVA test, and intraclass correlation coefficient tests were used to evaluate the differences between the two methods. The level of statistical significance was set at p< 0.05. Results: Except for SNB, NPog, U1.SN, U1.NA, L1-APog, I/I, and LLE parameters, all other parameters presented significant differences between the two methods (p< 0.05). While there was no difference (p> 0.05) in both SNA and SNB measurements between the two methods in the Class I malocclusion group, there was a difference between both methods in the Class II malocclusion group. Meanwhile, only the SNA in the Class III malocclusion group was different (p< 0.05). The ANB angle differed significantly in all three malocclusion groups. For both methods, all parameters except CoA and CoGn were found to have good correlation. Conclusion: Although significant differences were detected in some measurements between the two cephalometric analysis methods, not all differences were clinically significant. The AI-based cephalometric analysis method needs to be developed for more specific malocclusions.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400300&tlng=enArtificial intelligenceAutomatic cephalometric analysisDigital cephalometric analysisSkeletal malocclusion |
| spellingShingle | Gökhan ÇOBAN Taner ÖZTÜRK Nizami HASHIMLI Ahmet YAĞCI Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics Artificial intelligence Automatic cephalometric analysis Digital cephalometric analysis Skeletal malocclusion |
| title | Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software |
| title_full | Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software |
| title_fullStr | Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software |
| title_short | Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software |
| title_sort | comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software |
| topic | Artificial intelligence Automatic cephalometric analysis Digital cephalometric analysis Skeletal malocclusion |
| url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512022000400300&tlng=en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gokhancoban comparisonbetweencephalometricmeasurementsusingdigitalmanualandwebbasedartificialintelligencecephalometrictracingsoftware AT tanerozturk comparisonbetweencephalometricmeasurementsusingdigitalmanualandwebbasedartificialintelligencecephalometrictracingsoftware AT nizamihashimli comparisonbetweencephalometricmeasurementsusingdigitalmanualandwebbasedartificialintelligencecephalometrictracingsoftware AT ahmetyagci comparisonbetweencephalometricmeasurementsusingdigitalmanualandwebbasedartificialintelligencecephalometrictracingsoftware |