Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals
Abstract Background Lack of effective peer-review process of predatory journals, resulting in more ambiguity in reporting, language and incomplete descriptions of processes might have an impact on the reliability of PEDro scale. The aim of this investigation was to compare the reliability of the PED...
Main Authors: | Matteo Paci, Claudio Bianchini, Marco Baccini |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
AboutScience Srl
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Archives of Physiotherapy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-022-00133-6 |
Similar Items
-
Predatory Journals and Publishers
by: Ahmet Aslan
Published: (2018-11-01) -
How to Protect the Credibility of Articles Published in Predatory Journals
by: Yuki Yamada
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Assesing motor impairment of the trunk in patients with traumatic brain injury: reliability and validity of the trunk impairment scale
by: G. Verheyden, et al.
Published: (2006-02-01) -
Validity and reliability of the spiritual care competency scale for oncology nurses in Taiwan
by: Hui-Fen Fang, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01) -
Clinimetric properties of a postural assessment software in older people: reliability, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change
by: Juliana Magalhães Machado Barbosa, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)