Stakeholder Perceptions on the Need for Updated Tree Species Distribution Maps

Tree species distributions presented as range maps are powerful tools for forest-based decision-making processes. In the United States, <i>Silvics of North America</i> is a well-known reference for over 200 tree species. However, the current range maps are likely outdated due to changes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pete Bettinger, Krista Merry, Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon, Taeyoon Lee, Jacek Siry, Steve McNulty, Michael Gavazzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/10/1367
_version_ 1797514538461954048
author Pete Bettinger
Krista Merry
Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon
Taeyoon Lee
Jacek Siry
Steve McNulty
Michael Gavazzi
author_facet Pete Bettinger
Krista Merry
Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon
Taeyoon Lee
Jacek Siry
Steve McNulty
Michael Gavazzi
author_sort Pete Bettinger
collection DOAJ
description Tree species distributions presented as range maps are powerful tools for forest-based decision-making processes. In the United States, <i>Silvics of North America</i> is a well-known reference for over 200 tree species. However, the current range maps are likely outdated due to changes in land use, advancements in technology, shifts in plant hardiness zones due to climate change, and shifting societal values that influence the development of these resources. Therefore, a survey was distributed to two stakeholder groups, registered foresters in four states and members of several professional organizations, to gain insight into whether <i>Silvics of North America</i> range maps should be updated. Although the survey delivery method varied between the two survey sampling frames, the opinions on updating species range maps between the two stakeholder groups were similar. Both groups indicated that updating the current range maps would be valuable and would best be informed by remote sensing, national field inventories, and expert insight, and by adding color and perhaps importance classes.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:33:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b5c27899a6cb495bacb464f10a00159a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:33:59Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-b5c27899a6cb495bacb464f10a00159a2023-11-22T18:18:33ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072021-10-011210136710.3390/f12101367Stakeholder Perceptions on the Need for Updated Tree Species Distribution MapsPete Bettinger0Krista Merry1Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon2Taeyoon Lee3Jacek Siry4Steve McNulty5Michael Gavazzi6Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USAWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USAIndependent Researcher, Summerville, SC 29483, USAWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USAWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USASouthern Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, Asheville, NC 27709, USASouthern Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, Asheville, NC 27709, USATree species distributions presented as range maps are powerful tools for forest-based decision-making processes. In the United States, <i>Silvics of North America</i> is a well-known reference for over 200 tree species. However, the current range maps are likely outdated due to changes in land use, advancements in technology, shifts in plant hardiness zones due to climate change, and shifting societal values that influence the development of these resources. Therefore, a survey was distributed to two stakeholder groups, registered foresters in four states and members of several professional organizations, to gain insight into whether <i>Silvics of North America</i> range maps should be updated. Although the survey delivery method varied between the two survey sampling frames, the opinions on updating species range maps between the two stakeholder groups were similar. Both groups indicated that updating the current range maps would be valuable and would best be informed by remote sensing, national field inventories, and expert insight, and by adding color and perhaps importance classes.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/10/1367range mapstree species distributionsinternet surveys
spellingShingle Pete Bettinger
Krista Merry
Alba Rocio Gutierrez Garzon
Taeyoon Lee
Jacek Siry
Steve McNulty
Michael Gavazzi
Stakeholder Perceptions on the Need for Updated Tree Species Distribution Maps
Forests
range maps
tree species distributions
internet surveys
title Stakeholder Perceptions on the Need for Updated Tree Species Distribution Maps
title_full Stakeholder Perceptions on the Need for Updated Tree Species Distribution Maps
title_fullStr Stakeholder Perceptions on the Need for Updated Tree Species Distribution Maps
title_full_unstemmed Stakeholder Perceptions on the Need for Updated Tree Species Distribution Maps
title_short Stakeholder Perceptions on the Need for Updated Tree Species Distribution Maps
title_sort stakeholder perceptions on the need for updated tree species distribution maps
topic range maps
tree species distributions
internet surveys
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/10/1367
work_keys_str_mv AT petebettinger stakeholderperceptionsontheneedforupdatedtreespeciesdistributionmaps
AT kristamerry stakeholderperceptionsontheneedforupdatedtreespeciesdistributionmaps
AT albarociogutierrezgarzon stakeholderperceptionsontheneedforupdatedtreespeciesdistributionmaps
AT taeyoonlee stakeholderperceptionsontheneedforupdatedtreespeciesdistributionmaps
AT jaceksiry stakeholderperceptionsontheneedforupdatedtreespeciesdistributionmaps
AT stevemcnulty stakeholderperceptionsontheneedforupdatedtreespeciesdistributionmaps
AT michaelgavazzi stakeholderperceptionsontheneedforupdatedtreespeciesdistributionmaps