Radiation-related Lymphopenia after Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Prostate Cancer

Purpose: Given the uncertainty with regard to the effectiveness of pelvic nodal irradiation (PNI) for prostate cancer, we aimed to determine whether patients with prostate cancer who are treated with PNI are at a higher risk of developing radiation-related lymphopenia (RRL). Methods and materials: T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael D. Schad, BS, Sunil W. Dutta, MD, Donald M. Muller, MD, Krishni Wijesooriya, PhD, Timothy N. Showalter, MD, MPH
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-04-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109419300065
_version_ 1817986413865467904
author Michael D. Schad, BS
Sunil W. Dutta, MD
Donald M. Muller, MD
Krishni Wijesooriya, PhD
Timothy N. Showalter, MD, MPH
author_facet Michael D. Schad, BS
Sunil W. Dutta, MD
Donald M. Muller, MD
Krishni Wijesooriya, PhD
Timothy N. Showalter, MD, MPH
author_sort Michael D. Schad, BS
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Given the uncertainty with regard to the effectiveness of pelvic nodal irradiation (PNI) for prostate cancer, we aimed to determine whether patients with prostate cancer who are treated with PNI are at a higher risk of developing radiation-related lymphopenia (RRL). Methods and materials: The electronic charts of 886 consecutive patients treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer between 2006 and 2018 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Qualifying patients were those with total lymphocyte counts within 1 year before and 3 to 24 months after the start of radiation therapy. Lymphopenia was the primary outcome, and overall survival and biochemical progression-free survival were secondary outcomes. Results: Thirty-six patients with and 95 patients without PNI qualified for inclusion. In the PNI cohort, 61.1% of patients developed RRL (median follow-up total lymphocyte count < 1000 cells/μL) versus 26.3% of non-PNI patients (P < .001). On univariate analysis, initial prostate-specific antigen level, baseline lymphopenia, treatment modality, PNI status, increased planned target volume, and androgen deprivation therapy administration were all significant predictors of RRL (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, PNI status was a significant predictor of RRL (hazard ratio [HR], 3.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-9.61; P < .001), as were initial prostate-specific antigen values (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.11; P = .006) and baseline lymphopenia (HR, 8.32; 95% CI, 2.19-31.6; P = .007). RRL was not predictive for biochemical progression-free survival, distant metastasis, or overall survival on multivariate analysis, but the number of events was likely insufficient for these analyses. Conclusions: The higher risk of RRL among patients with PNI comports with other papers that show that increased treatment volumes are associated with higher rates of RRL. Mounting evidence for the adverse effects of RRL on clinical outcomes supports the significance of our findings and suggests that further studies are needed on RRL as a potential harm of PNI that may affect the interpretation of results from clinical trials of PNI.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T00:08:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b5c2cc411ea2422d9588848024bd6365
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2452-1094
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T00:08:59Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-b5c2cc411ea2422d9588848024bd63652022-12-22T02:23:25ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942019-04-0142323330Radiation-related Lymphopenia after Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Prostate CancerMichael D. Schad, BS0Sunil W. Dutta, MD1Donald M. Muller, MD2Krishni Wijesooriya, PhD3Timothy N. Showalter, MD, MPH4Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VirginiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VirginiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VirginiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VirginiaCorresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, 1240 Lee Street, P.O. Box 800383, Charlottesville, VA 22908.; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VirginiaPurpose: Given the uncertainty with regard to the effectiveness of pelvic nodal irradiation (PNI) for prostate cancer, we aimed to determine whether patients with prostate cancer who are treated with PNI are at a higher risk of developing radiation-related lymphopenia (RRL). Methods and materials: The electronic charts of 886 consecutive patients treated with radiation therapy for prostate cancer between 2006 and 2018 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Qualifying patients were those with total lymphocyte counts within 1 year before and 3 to 24 months after the start of radiation therapy. Lymphopenia was the primary outcome, and overall survival and biochemical progression-free survival were secondary outcomes. Results: Thirty-six patients with and 95 patients without PNI qualified for inclusion. In the PNI cohort, 61.1% of patients developed RRL (median follow-up total lymphocyte count < 1000 cells/μL) versus 26.3% of non-PNI patients (P < .001). On univariate analysis, initial prostate-specific antigen level, baseline lymphopenia, treatment modality, PNI status, increased planned target volume, and androgen deprivation therapy administration were all significant predictors of RRL (P < .05). On multivariate analysis, PNI status was a significant predictor of RRL (hazard ratio [HR], 3.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-9.61; P < .001), as were initial prostate-specific antigen values (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.11; P = .006) and baseline lymphopenia (HR, 8.32; 95% CI, 2.19-31.6; P = .007). RRL was not predictive for biochemical progression-free survival, distant metastasis, or overall survival on multivariate analysis, but the number of events was likely insufficient for these analyses. Conclusions: The higher risk of RRL among patients with PNI comports with other papers that show that increased treatment volumes are associated with higher rates of RRL. Mounting evidence for the adverse effects of RRL on clinical outcomes supports the significance of our findings and suggests that further studies are needed on RRL as a potential harm of PNI that may affect the interpretation of results from clinical trials of PNI.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109419300065
spellingShingle Michael D. Schad, BS
Sunil W. Dutta, MD
Donald M. Muller, MD
Krishni Wijesooriya, PhD
Timothy N. Showalter, MD, MPH
Radiation-related Lymphopenia after Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Prostate Cancer
Advances in Radiation Oncology
title Radiation-related Lymphopenia after Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Prostate Cancer
title_full Radiation-related Lymphopenia after Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Radiation-related Lymphopenia after Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Radiation-related Lymphopenia after Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Prostate Cancer
title_short Radiation-related Lymphopenia after Pelvic Nodal Irradiation for Prostate Cancer
title_sort radiation related lymphopenia after pelvic nodal irradiation for prostate cancer
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109419300065
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeldschadbs radiationrelatedlymphopeniaafterpelvicnodalirradiationforprostatecancer
AT sunilwduttamd radiationrelatedlymphopeniaafterpelvicnodalirradiationforprostatecancer
AT donaldmmullermd radiationrelatedlymphopeniaafterpelvicnodalirradiationforprostatecancer
AT krishniwijesooriyaphd radiationrelatedlymphopeniaafterpelvicnodalirradiationforprostatecancer
AT timothynshowaltermdmph radiationrelatedlymphopeniaafterpelvicnodalirradiationforprostatecancer