Effects of Isometric Handgrip Training in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Meta‐analyses have shown that isometric handgrip training (IHT) can reduce brachial systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) by >6/4 mm Hg, respectively. However, whether IHT promotes these effects among patients with peripheral artery disease, who exhibit severe impairment in cardio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marilia A. Correia, Paulo L. Oliveira, Breno Q. Farah, Lauro C. Vianna, Nelson Wolosker, Pedro Puech‐Leao, Daniel J. Green, Gabriel G. Cucato, Raphael M. Ritti‐Dias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-02-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.013596
_version_ 1797884431854206976
author Marilia A. Correia
Paulo L. Oliveira
Breno Q. Farah
Lauro C. Vianna
Nelson Wolosker
Pedro Puech‐Leao
Daniel J. Green
Gabriel G. Cucato
Raphael M. Ritti‐Dias
author_facet Marilia A. Correia
Paulo L. Oliveira
Breno Q. Farah
Lauro C. Vianna
Nelson Wolosker
Pedro Puech‐Leao
Daniel J. Green
Gabriel G. Cucato
Raphael M. Ritti‐Dias
author_sort Marilia A. Correia
collection DOAJ
description Background Meta‐analyses have shown that isometric handgrip training (IHT) can reduce brachial systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) by >6/4 mm Hg, respectively. However, whether IHT promotes these effects among patients with peripheral artery disease, who exhibit severe impairment in cardiovascular function, is currently unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of IHT on the cardiovascular function of patients with peripheral artery disease. Methods and Results A randomized controlled trial with peripheral artery disease patients assigned to either the IHT or control group was conducted. The IHT group performed 3 sessions per week, for 8 weeks, of unilateral handgrip exercises, consisting of 4 sets of isometric contractions for 2 minutes at 30% of maximum voluntary contraction and a 4‐minute interval between sets. The control group received a compression ball in order to minimize the placebo effects, representing sham training. The primary outcome was brachial BP. The secondary outcomes were central BP, arterial stiffness parameters, cardiac autonomic modulation, and vascular function. The IHT program reduced diastolic BP (75 [10] mm Hg preintervention versus 72 [11] mm Hg postintervention), with no change in the control group (74 [11] mm Hg preintervention versus 74 [11] mm Hg postintervention), with this between‐group difference being significant (P=0.04). Flow‐mediated dilation improved in the IHT group (6.0% [5.7] preintervention versus 9.7% [5.5] postintervention), with no change in the control group (7.6% [5.5] preintervention versus 7.4% [5.1] postintervention), with this between‐group difference being significant (P=0.04). There was no change in other measured variables over the intervention period. Conclusions IHT reduced brachial diastolic BP and improved local vascular function in patients with peripheral artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02742220.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:06:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b5d65c9bc3fa4913aeb5cf51952745ec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:06:10Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-b5d65c9bc3fa4913aeb5cf51952745ec2023-03-13T05:25:33ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802020-02-019410.1161/JAHA.119.013596Effects of Isometric Handgrip Training in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled TrialMarilia A. Correia0Paulo L. Oliveira1Breno Q. Farah2Lauro C. Vianna3Nelson Wolosker4Pedro Puech‐Leao5Daniel J. Green6Gabriel G. Cucato7Raphael M. Ritti‐Dias8Associated Graduated Program in Physical Education Universidade de Pernambuco e Universidade da Paraíba Recife BrazilGraduated Program in Rehabilitation Sciences Universidade Nove de Julho São Paulo BrazilFederal Rural University of Pernambuco Recife BrazilFaculty of Physical Education Universidade de Brasília Brasília BrazilHospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo BrazilFaculty of Medicine University of São Paulo BrazilThe University of Western Australia Perth AustraliaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo BrazilGraduated Program in Rehabilitation Sciences Universidade Nove de Julho São Paulo BrazilBackground Meta‐analyses have shown that isometric handgrip training (IHT) can reduce brachial systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) by >6/4 mm Hg, respectively. However, whether IHT promotes these effects among patients with peripheral artery disease, who exhibit severe impairment in cardiovascular function, is currently unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of IHT on the cardiovascular function of patients with peripheral artery disease. Methods and Results A randomized controlled trial with peripheral artery disease patients assigned to either the IHT or control group was conducted. The IHT group performed 3 sessions per week, for 8 weeks, of unilateral handgrip exercises, consisting of 4 sets of isometric contractions for 2 minutes at 30% of maximum voluntary contraction and a 4‐minute interval between sets. The control group received a compression ball in order to minimize the placebo effects, representing sham training. The primary outcome was brachial BP. The secondary outcomes were central BP, arterial stiffness parameters, cardiac autonomic modulation, and vascular function. The IHT program reduced diastolic BP (75 [10] mm Hg preintervention versus 72 [11] mm Hg postintervention), with no change in the control group (74 [11] mm Hg preintervention versus 74 [11] mm Hg postintervention), with this between‐group difference being significant (P=0.04). Flow‐mediated dilation improved in the IHT group (6.0% [5.7] preintervention versus 9.7% [5.5] postintervention), with no change in the control group (7.6% [5.5] preintervention versus 7.4% [5.1] postintervention), with this between‐group difference being significant (P=0.04). There was no change in other measured variables over the intervention period. Conclusions IHT reduced brachial diastolic BP and improved local vascular function in patients with peripheral artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02742220.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.013596blood pressurecardiovascular systemintermittent claudicationperipheral vascular disease
spellingShingle Marilia A. Correia
Paulo L. Oliveira
Breno Q. Farah
Lauro C. Vianna
Nelson Wolosker
Pedro Puech‐Leao
Daniel J. Green
Gabriel G. Cucato
Raphael M. Ritti‐Dias
Effects of Isometric Handgrip Training in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
blood pressure
cardiovascular system
intermittent claudication
peripheral vascular disease
title Effects of Isometric Handgrip Training in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effects of Isometric Handgrip Training in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effects of Isometric Handgrip Training in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Isometric Handgrip Training in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effects of Isometric Handgrip Training in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effects of isometric handgrip training in patients with peripheral artery disease a randomized controlled trial
topic blood pressure
cardiovascular system
intermittent claudication
peripheral vascular disease
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.119.013596
work_keys_str_mv AT mariliaacorreia effectsofisometrichandgriptraininginpatientswithperipheralarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paulololiveira effectsofisometrichandgriptraininginpatientswithperipheralarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brenoqfarah effectsofisometrichandgriptraininginpatientswithperipheralarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT laurocvianna effectsofisometrichandgriptraininginpatientswithperipheralarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nelsonwolosker effectsofisometrichandgriptraininginpatientswithperipheralarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pedropuechleao effectsofisometrichandgriptraininginpatientswithperipheralarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT danieljgreen effectsofisometrichandgriptraininginpatientswithperipheralarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gabrielgcucato effectsofisometrichandgriptraininginpatientswithperipheralarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT raphaelmrittidias effectsofisometrichandgriptraininginpatientswithperipheralarterydiseasearandomizedcontrolledtrial