Five-Year Results of Aortic Remodeling for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Following Endovascular Repair

BackgroundThis study was performed to compare aortic remodeling and clinical outcomes in patients with acute, subacute, and chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).MethodsWe retrospectively examined 323 consecutive patients with acute (n = 129), suba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guangmin Yang, Hongwei Ge, Guangyan Wu, Yepeng Zhang, Leiyang Zhang, Ming Zhang, Xiaoqiang Li, Min Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.847368/full
_version_ 1811235306577330176
author Guangmin Yang
Guangmin Yang
Hongwei Ge
Guangyan Wu
Yepeng Zhang
Leiyang Zhang
Ming Zhang
Xiaoqiang Li
Min Zhou
author_facet Guangmin Yang
Guangmin Yang
Hongwei Ge
Guangyan Wu
Yepeng Zhang
Leiyang Zhang
Ming Zhang
Xiaoqiang Li
Min Zhou
author_sort Guangmin Yang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundThis study was performed to compare aortic remodeling and clinical outcomes in patients with acute, subacute, and chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).MethodsWe retrospectively examined 323 consecutive patients with acute (n = 129), subacute (n = 161), and chronic (n = 33) TBAD who underwent TEVAR from June 2013 to December 2016 in in multicenter institution. Patient demographics, clinical data, and imaging characteristics were recorded and compared among the three groups.ResultsThe three groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Perioperative mortality rates were similar among the acute (2.3%), subacute (0.0%), and chronic (0.0%) groups (P = 0.34). Perioperative morbidity rates, including the rates of visceral and lower limb malperfusion and cerebral infraction, were also similar. The rate of perioperative endoleak was significantly higher in the chronic group (18.1%) than in the acute (3.9%) and subacute (3.7%) groups (P = 0.02). The mean follow-up duration was 78 ± 22 months (range, 36–101 months). The mortality rates were comparable among the three groups. The rates of reintervention and lower limb malperfusion were higher in the chronic group than in the acute and subacute groups. FL diameter reduction were more robust in the acute and subacute groups than in the chronic group.ConclusionPatients with acute, subacute, and chronic TBAD had different outcomes in this study. Patients with acute and subacute TBAD had fewer complications than those with chronic TBAD. Aortic remodeling after TEVAR was more favorable in patients with acute and subacute TBAD than in patients with chronic TBAD. TEVAR promotes more positive remodeling at the stent graft level than at the distal level of the aorta.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:48:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b5e4db11c8d34f04b5df64bbe5687893
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:48:38Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b5e4db11c8d34f04b5df64bbe56878932022-12-22T03:34:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2022-05-01910.3389/fcvm.2022.847368847368Five-Year Results of Aortic Remodeling for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Following Endovascular RepairGuangmin Yang0Guangmin Yang1Hongwei Ge2Guangyan Wu3Yepeng Zhang4Leiyang Zhang5Ming Zhang6Xiaoqiang Li7Min Zhou8Department of Vascular Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated to School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing, ChinaBackgroundThis study was performed to compare aortic remodeling and clinical outcomes in patients with acute, subacute, and chronic type B aortic dissection (TBAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).MethodsWe retrospectively examined 323 consecutive patients with acute (n = 129), subacute (n = 161), and chronic (n = 33) TBAD who underwent TEVAR from June 2013 to December 2016 in in multicenter institution. Patient demographics, clinical data, and imaging characteristics were recorded and compared among the three groups.ResultsThe three groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Perioperative mortality rates were similar among the acute (2.3%), subacute (0.0%), and chronic (0.0%) groups (P = 0.34). Perioperative morbidity rates, including the rates of visceral and lower limb malperfusion and cerebral infraction, were also similar. The rate of perioperative endoleak was significantly higher in the chronic group (18.1%) than in the acute (3.9%) and subacute (3.7%) groups (P = 0.02). The mean follow-up duration was 78 ± 22 months (range, 36–101 months). The mortality rates were comparable among the three groups. The rates of reintervention and lower limb malperfusion were higher in the chronic group than in the acute and subacute groups. FL diameter reduction were more robust in the acute and subacute groups than in the chronic group.ConclusionPatients with acute, subacute, and chronic TBAD had different outcomes in this study. Patients with acute and subacute TBAD had fewer complications than those with chronic TBAD. Aortic remodeling after TEVAR was more favorable in patients with acute and subacute TBAD than in patients with chronic TBAD. TEVAR promotes more positive remodeling at the stent graft level than at the distal level of the aorta.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.847368/fullmulticenter-center retrospective cohort study type B aortic dissectionthoracic endovascular aortic repairaortic remodelingendoleaktype B aortic dissection
spellingShingle Guangmin Yang
Guangmin Yang
Hongwei Ge
Guangyan Wu
Yepeng Zhang
Leiyang Zhang
Ming Zhang
Xiaoqiang Li
Min Zhou
Five-Year Results of Aortic Remodeling for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Following Endovascular Repair
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
multicenter-center retrospective cohort study type B aortic dissection
thoracic endovascular aortic repair
aortic remodeling
endoleak
type B aortic dissection
title Five-Year Results of Aortic Remodeling for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Following Endovascular Repair
title_full Five-Year Results of Aortic Remodeling for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Following Endovascular Repair
title_fullStr Five-Year Results of Aortic Remodeling for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Following Endovascular Repair
title_full_unstemmed Five-Year Results of Aortic Remodeling for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Following Endovascular Repair
title_short Five-Year Results of Aortic Remodeling for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Type B Aortic Dissection Following Endovascular Repair
title_sort five year results of aortic remodeling for acute subacute and chronic type b aortic dissection following endovascular repair
topic multicenter-center retrospective cohort study type B aortic dissection
thoracic endovascular aortic repair
aortic remodeling
endoleak
type B aortic dissection
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.847368/full
work_keys_str_mv AT guangminyang fiveyearresultsofaorticremodelingforacutesubacuteandchronictypebaorticdissectionfollowingendovascularrepair
AT guangminyang fiveyearresultsofaorticremodelingforacutesubacuteandchronictypebaorticdissectionfollowingendovascularrepair
AT hongweige fiveyearresultsofaorticremodelingforacutesubacuteandchronictypebaorticdissectionfollowingendovascularrepair
AT guangyanwu fiveyearresultsofaorticremodelingforacutesubacuteandchronictypebaorticdissectionfollowingendovascularrepair
AT yepengzhang fiveyearresultsofaorticremodelingforacutesubacuteandchronictypebaorticdissectionfollowingendovascularrepair
AT leiyangzhang fiveyearresultsofaorticremodelingforacutesubacuteandchronictypebaorticdissectionfollowingendovascularrepair
AT mingzhang fiveyearresultsofaorticremodelingforacutesubacuteandchronictypebaorticdissectionfollowingendovascularrepair
AT xiaoqiangli fiveyearresultsofaorticremodelingforacutesubacuteandchronictypebaorticdissectionfollowingendovascularrepair
AT minzhou fiveyearresultsofaorticremodelingforacutesubacuteandchronictypebaorticdissectionfollowingendovascularrepair