Weak values and the past of a quantum particle

We investigate four key issues with using a nonzero weak value of the spatial projection operator to infer the past path of an individual quantum particle. First, we note that weak measurements disturb a system, so any approach relying on such a perturbation to determine the location of a quantum pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonte R. Hance, John Rarity, James Ladyman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2023-04-01
Series:Physical Review Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023048
_version_ 1797210531778527232
author Jonte R. Hance
John Rarity
James Ladyman
author_facet Jonte R. Hance
John Rarity
James Ladyman
author_sort Jonte R. Hance
collection DOAJ
description We investigate four key issues with using a nonzero weak value of the spatial projection operator to infer the past path of an individual quantum particle. First, we note that weak measurements disturb a system, so any approach relying on such a perturbation to determine the location of a quantum particle describes the state of a disturbed system, not that of a hypothetical undisturbed system. Second, even assuming no disturbance, there is no reason to associate the nonzero weak value of an operator containing the spatial projection operator with the classical idea of “particle presence.” Third, weak values are only measurable over ensembles, and so to infer properties of individual particles from values of them is problematic. Finally, weak value approaches to the path of a particle do not provide information beyond standard quantum mechanics (and the classical modes supporting the experiment). We know of no experiment with testable consequences that demonstrates a connection between particle presence and weak values.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T10:12:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b5f44e315a274f218eab221ee7288e00
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2643-1564
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T10:12:05Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher American Physical Society
record_format Article
series Physical Review Research
spelling doaj.art-b5f44e315a274f218eab221ee7288e002024-04-12T17:30:22ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Research2643-15642023-04-015202304810.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023048Weak values and the past of a quantum particleJonte R. HanceJohn RarityJames LadymanWe investigate four key issues with using a nonzero weak value of the spatial projection operator to infer the past path of an individual quantum particle. First, we note that weak measurements disturb a system, so any approach relying on such a perturbation to determine the location of a quantum particle describes the state of a disturbed system, not that of a hypothetical undisturbed system. Second, even assuming no disturbance, there is no reason to associate the nonzero weak value of an operator containing the spatial projection operator with the classical idea of “particle presence.” Third, weak values are only measurable over ensembles, and so to infer properties of individual particles from values of them is problematic. Finally, weak value approaches to the path of a particle do not provide information beyond standard quantum mechanics (and the classical modes supporting the experiment). We know of no experiment with testable consequences that demonstrates a connection between particle presence and weak values.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023048
spellingShingle Jonte R. Hance
John Rarity
James Ladyman
Weak values and the past of a quantum particle
Physical Review Research
title Weak values and the past of a quantum particle
title_full Weak values and the past of a quantum particle
title_fullStr Weak values and the past of a quantum particle
title_full_unstemmed Weak values and the past of a quantum particle
title_short Weak values and the past of a quantum particle
title_sort weak values and the past of a quantum particle
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023048
work_keys_str_mv AT jonterhance weakvaluesandthepastofaquantumparticle
AT johnrarity weakvaluesandthepastofaquantumparticle
AT jamesladyman weakvaluesandthepastofaquantumparticle