Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”
In surgical dentistry, suture material is the only foreign body that remains in the tissues after surgery, and it can lead to several negative reactions, for example, infection of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of mono- an...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Biomimetics |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/8/1/129 |
| _version_ | 1797613292844220416 |
|---|---|
| author | Alexey A. Pcheliakov Ekaterina Yu. Diachkova Yuriy L. Vasil’ev Oxana A. Svitich Alexander V. Poddubikov Stanislav A. Evlashin Beatrice A. Volel Anastasia A. Bakhmet Svetlana V. Klochkova Ellina V. Velichko Natalia Tiunova Svetlana V. Tarasenko |
| author_facet | Alexey A. Pcheliakov Ekaterina Yu. Diachkova Yuriy L. Vasil’ev Oxana A. Svitich Alexander V. Poddubikov Stanislav A. Evlashin Beatrice A. Volel Anastasia A. Bakhmet Svetlana V. Klochkova Ellina V. Velichko Natalia Tiunova Svetlana V. Tarasenko |
| author_sort | Alexey A. Pcheliakov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In surgical dentistry, suture material is the only foreign body that remains in the tissues after surgery, and it can lead to several negative reactions, for example, infection of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of mono- and polyfilament suture materials used in tooth extraction operations. The study of elongation and knot force was carried out on an Instron 5969 Dual Column Testing System device. The capillarity of the materials was studied on a setup assembled by the authors manually by immersing the ends of the filaments in a colored manganese solution. A microbiological study was carried out on the threads taken for the experiment immediately after wound suturing, and on day 7, at which time they were removed. The comparison was made according to Rothia mucilaginosa, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis. Results: monofilament suture materials (Prolene and Glycolon), after calculating the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney indices, showed better performance in all experiments compared to polyfilament sutures (Vicryl and PGA). In capillarity comparison, there was a significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.00018). According to the sum of the results of three microbiological studies on day 7, monofilament suture materials absorbed less of the studied bacteria on their surface compared to the polyfilament ones (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Conclusions: Of the studied suture materials, Prolene had the best microbiological resistance and good mechanical properties. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:52:52Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b5f5bf2f9d01478fb29cac960c6cd84b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2313-7673 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:52:52Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Biomimetics |
| spelling | doaj.art-b5f5bf2f9d01478fb29cac960c6cd84b2023-11-17T09:50:43ZengMDPI AGBiomimetics2313-76732023-03-018112910.3390/biomimetics8010129Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction”Alexey A. Pcheliakov0Ekaterina Yu. Diachkova1Yuriy L. Vasil’ev2Oxana A. Svitich3Alexander V. Poddubikov4Stanislav A. Evlashin5Beatrice A. Volel6Anastasia A. Bakhmet7Svetlana V. Klochkova8Ellina V. Velichko9Natalia Tiunova10Svetlana V. Tarasenko11Department of Oral Surgery of Borovsky Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya St. Bldg. 8\2, 119435 Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Oral Surgery of Borovsky Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya St. Bldg. 8\2, 119435 Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya St. Bldg. 8\2, 119435 Moscow, RussiaI.I. Mechnikov Research Institute for Vaccines and Sera, 105064 Moscow, RussiaMicrobiology, Virology and Immunology Department, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya St. Bldg. 8\2, 119435 Moscow, RussiaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 121205 Moscow, RussiaSklifosovskyi Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, St. Trubetskaya, 8, Bld. 2, 119991 Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Human Anatomy and Histology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya St. Bldg. 8\2, 119435 Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Human Anatomy, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 8, 117198 Moscow, RussiaDepartment of Dental Diseases Propaedeutics, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 8, 117198 Moscow, RussiaInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Department of Clinical Dentistry, National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (Lobachevsky University, UNN), Pr. Gagarina 23, 603022 Nizhny Novgorod, RussiaDepartment of Oral Surgery of Borovsky Institute of Dentistry, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Trubetskaya St. Bldg. 8\2, 119435 Moscow, RussiaIn surgical dentistry, suture material is the only foreign body that remains in the tissues after surgery, and it can lead to several negative reactions, for example, infection of the wound. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of mono- and polyfilament suture materials used in tooth extraction operations. The study of elongation and knot force was carried out on an Instron 5969 Dual Column Testing System device. The capillarity of the materials was studied on a setup assembled by the authors manually by immersing the ends of the filaments in a colored manganese solution. A microbiological study was carried out on the threads taken for the experiment immediately after wound suturing, and on day 7, at which time they were removed. The comparison was made according to Rothia mucilaginosa, Streptococcus sanguinis, Staphylococcus epidermidis. Results: monofilament suture materials (Prolene and Glycolon), after calculating the Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney indices, showed better performance in all experiments compared to polyfilament sutures (Vicryl and PGA). In capillarity comparison, there was a significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.00018). According to the sum of the results of three microbiological studies on day 7, monofilament suture materials absorbed less of the studied bacteria on their surface compared to the polyfilament ones (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Conclusions: Of the studied suture materials, Prolene had the best microbiological resistance and good mechanical properties.https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/8/1/129suture materialoral cavity microbiologypolyfilamentmonofilamentphysical propertiescapillarity |
| spellingShingle | Alexey A. Pcheliakov Ekaterina Yu. Diachkova Yuriy L. Vasil’ev Oxana A. Svitich Alexander V. Poddubikov Stanislav A. Evlashin Beatrice A. Volel Anastasia A. Bakhmet Svetlana V. Klochkova Ellina V. Velichko Natalia Tiunova Svetlana V. Tarasenko Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” Biomimetics suture material oral cavity microbiology polyfilament monofilament physical properties capillarity |
| title | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
| title_full | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
| title_short | Comparative Analysis of Mechanical Properties and Microbiological Resistance of Polyfilament and Monofilament Suture Materials Used in the Operation “Tooth Extraction” |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of mechanical properties and microbiological resistance of polyfilament and monofilament suture materials used in the operation tooth extraction |
| topic | suture material oral cavity microbiology polyfilament monofilament physical properties capillarity |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/8/1/129 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alexeyapcheliakov comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT ekaterinayudiachkova comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT yuriylvasilev comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT oxanaasvitich comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT alexandervpoddubikov comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT stanislavaevlashin comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT beatriceavolel comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT anastasiaabakhmet comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT svetlanavklochkova comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT ellinavvelichko comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT nataliatiunova comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction AT svetlanavtarasenko comparativeanalysisofmechanicalpropertiesandmicrobiologicalresistanceofpolyfilamentandmonofilamentsuturematerialsusedintheoperationtoothextraction |