How urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city

Large scale and rapid urbanization processes call for a better quality of urban planning to support human well-being. While compact cities aim to reduce land consumption, densification puts pressure on the remaining green areas, influencing ecosystem services provision and ultimately the life qualit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Marcelo Galleguillos-Torres, Angela Dissegna, Bettina Weibel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7acf
_version_ 1797747546576125952
author Adrienne Grêt-Regamey
Marcelo Galleguillos-Torres
Angela Dissegna
Bettina Weibel
author_facet Adrienne Grêt-Regamey
Marcelo Galleguillos-Torres
Angela Dissegna
Bettina Weibel
author_sort Adrienne Grêt-Regamey
collection DOAJ
description Large scale and rapid urbanization processes call for a better quality of urban planning to support human well-being. While compact cities aim to reduce land consumption, densification puts pressure on the remaining green areas, influencing ecosystem services provision and ultimately the life quality of the growing urban population. Supply of and demand for urban ecosystem services differ however greatly across the globe. In this study, we derive a set of urban typologies and their related ecosystem services bundles in both a temperate and a tropical city. We show that the supply of urban ecosystem services does not increase linearly with green area coverage, but is highly dependent on the urban form. While the surface sealed by infrastructures and the buildings themselves play a key role in influencing ecosystem services provision, we observe that the share of trees is particularly important for supporting regulating ecosystem services in built up neighborhoods. With a similar average surface-to-volume ratio, open midrise neighborhoods in Singapore provide more water flow regulation and air pollution control services than the same urban typology in Zurich. Microclimate regulation, in contrast, does not seem to be dependent on the context, but more on the amount of built up surface. Interestingly, we observe that open midrise neighborhoods synergistically support the supply of many regulating services in both case study areas, including microclimate regulation, water flow regulation and air pollution control. Large water and forest patches are unquestionably essential in both Singapore and Zurich to support bundles of ecosystem services, particularly also for recreational activities. Using open data, the approach can be transferred to other cities and support decision makers in their efforts to plan the sustainable development of cities across the world.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:52:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b5fa8fc107c34c70adb72fa38e376104
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:52:06Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-b5fa8fc107c34c70adb72fa38e3761042023-08-09T15:05:49ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262020-01-0115707500110.1088/1748-9326/ab7acfHow urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical cityAdrienne Grêt-Regamey0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8156-9503Marcelo Galleguillos-Torres1Angela Dissegna2Bettina Weibel3Planning of Landscape and Urban Systems, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) , Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, Zurich 8093, Switzerland; Natural Capital Singapore, Singapore-ETH Centre , 1 Create Way, Singapore 138602, Singapore; Future Cities Laboratory, Singapore ETH Center , 1 Create Way, Singapore 138602, Singapore; Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.Planning of Landscape and Urban Systems, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) , Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, Zurich 8093, SwitzerlandFuture Cities Laboratory, Singapore ETH Center , 1 Create Way, Singapore 138602, SingaporePlanning of Landscape and Urban Systems, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) , Stefano-Franscini-Platz 5, Zurich 8093, SwitzerlandLarge scale and rapid urbanization processes call for a better quality of urban planning to support human well-being. While compact cities aim to reduce land consumption, densification puts pressure on the remaining green areas, influencing ecosystem services provision and ultimately the life quality of the growing urban population. Supply of and demand for urban ecosystem services differ however greatly across the globe. In this study, we derive a set of urban typologies and their related ecosystem services bundles in both a temperate and a tropical city. We show that the supply of urban ecosystem services does not increase linearly with green area coverage, but is highly dependent on the urban form. While the surface sealed by infrastructures and the buildings themselves play a key role in influencing ecosystem services provision, we observe that the share of trees is particularly important for supporting regulating ecosystem services in built up neighborhoods. With a similar average surface-to-volume ratio, open midrise neighborhoods in Singapore provide more water flow regulation and air pollution control services than the same urban typology in Zurich. Microclimate regulation, in contrast, does not seem to be dependent on the context, but more on the amount of built up surface. Interestingly, we observe that open midrise neighborhoods synergistically support the supply of many regulating services in both case study areas, including microclimate regulation, water flow regulation and air pollution control. Large water and forest patches are unquestionably essential in both Singapore and Zurich to support bundles of ecosystem services, particularly also for recreational activities. Using open data, the approach can be transferred to other cities and support decision makers in their efforts to plan the sustainable development of cities across the world.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7acfecosystem servicesmappingtropicsurban typologiesopen dataurban form
spellingShingle Adrienne Grêt-Regamey
Marcelo Galleguillos-Torres
Angela Dissegna
Bettina Weibel
How urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city
Environmental Research Letters
ecosystem services
mapping
tropics
urban typologies
open data
urban form
title How urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city
title_full How urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city
title_fullStr How urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city
title_full_unstemmed How urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city
title_short How urban densification influences ecosystem services—a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city
title_sort how urban densification influences ecosystem services a comparison between a temperate and a tropical city
topic ecosystem services
mapping
tropics
urban typologies
open data
urban form
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab7acf
work_keys_str_mv AT adriennegretregamey howurbandensificationinfluencesecosystemservicesacomparisonbetweenatemperateandatropicalcity
AT marcelogalleguillostorres howurbandensificationinfluencesecosystemservicesacomparisonbetweenatemperateandatropicalcity
AT angeladissegna howurbandensificationinfluencesecosystemservicesacomparisonbetweenatemperateandatropicalcity
AT bettinaweibel howurbandensificationinfluencesecosystemservicesacomparisonbetweenatemperateandatropicalcity