Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold

Due to a relative paucity of studies on human lymphatic assembly in vitro and subsequent in vivo transplantation, capillary formation and survival of primary human lymphatic (hLEC) and blood endothelial cells (hBEC) ± primary human vascular smooth muscle cells (hvSMC) were evaluated and compared in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne M Kong, Shiang Y Lim, Jason A Palmer, Amanda Rixon, Yi-Wen Gerrand, Kiryu K Yap, Wayne A Morrison, Geraldine M Mitchell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Tissue Engineering
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314221140979
_version_ 1797976742272434176
author Anne M Kong
Shiang Y Lim
Jason A Palmer
Amanda Rixon
Yi-Wen Gerrand
Kiryu K Yap
Wayne A Morrison
Geraldine M Mitchell
author_facet Anne M Kong
Shiang Y Lim
Jason A Palmer
Amanda Rixon
Yi-Wen Gerrand
Kiryu K Yap
Wayne A Morrison
Geraldine M Mitchell
author_sort Anne M Kong
collection DOAJ
description Due to a relative paucity of studies on human lymphatic assembly in vitro and subsequent in vivo transplantation, capillary formation and survival of primary human lymphatic (hLEC) and blood endothelial cells (hBEC) ± primary human vascular smooth muscle cells (hvSMC) were evaluated and compared in vitro and in vivo. hLEC ± hvSMC or hBEC ± hvSMC were seeded in a 3D porous scaffold in vitro, and capillary percent vascular volume (PVV) and vascular density (VD)/mm 2 assessed. Scaffolds were also transplanted into a sub-cutaneous rat wound with morphology/morphometry assessment. Initially hBEC formed a larger vessel network in vitro than hLEC, with interconnected capillaries evident at 2 days. Interconnected lymphatic capillaries were slower (3 days) to assemble. hLEC capillaries demonstrated a significant overall increase in PVV ( p = 0.0083) and VD ( p = 0.0039) in vitro when co-cultured with hvSMC. A similar increase did not occur for hBEC + hvSMC in vitro, but hBEC + hvSMC in vivo significantly increased PVV ( p = 0.0035) and VD ( p = 0.0087). Morphology/morphometry established that hLEC vessels maintained distinct cell markers, and demonstrated significantly increased individual vessel and network size, and longer survival than hBEC capillaries in vivo, and established inosculation with rat lymphatics, with evidence of lymphatic function. The porous polyurethane scaffold provided advantages to capillary network formation due to its large (300–600 μm diameter) interconnected pores, and sufficient stability to ensure successful surgical transplantation in vivo. Given their successful survival and function in vivo within the porous scaffold, in vitro assembled hLEC networks using this method are potentially applicable to clinical scenarios requiring replacement of dysfunctional or absent lymphatic networks.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:55:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b602b3a137584812bf6eb329c7df97b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2041-7314
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:55:48Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Tissue Engineering
spelling doaj.art-b602b3a137584812bf6eb329c7df97b72022-12-26T15:33:48ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Tissue Engineering2041-73142022-12-011310.1177/20417314221140979Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffoldAnne M Kong0Shiang Y Lim1Jason A Palmer2Amanda Rixon3Yi-Wen Gerrand4Kiryu K Yap5Wayne A Morrison6Geraldine M Mitchell7O’Brien Institute Department of St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, VIC, AustraliaNational Heart Research Institute Singapore, National Heart Centre SingaporeCentre for Eye Research Australia, East Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaExperimental Medical and Surgical Unit, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, AustraliaO’Brien Institute Department of St Vincent’s Institute of Medical Research, Fitzroy, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Surgery at St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, AustraliaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, AustraliaFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, East Melbourne VIC, AustraliaDue to a relative paucity of studies on human lymphatic assembly in vitro and subsequent in vivo transplantation, capillary formation and survival of primary human lymphatic (hLEC) and blood endothelial cells (hBEC) ± primary human vascular smooth muscle cells (hvSMC) were evaluated and compared in vitro and in vivo. hLEC ± hvSMC or hBEC ± hvSMC were seeded in a 3D porous scaffold in vitro, and capillary percent vascular volume (PVV) and vascular density (VD)/mm 2 assessed. Scaffolds were also transplanted into a sub-cutaneous rat wound with morphology/morphometry assessment. Initially hBEC formed a larger vessel network in vitro than hLEC, with interconnected capillaries evident at 2 days. Interconnected lymphatic capillaries were slower (3 days) to assemble. hLEC capillaries demonstrated a significant overall increase in PVV ( p = 0.0083) and VD ( p = 0.0039) in vitro when co-cultured with hvSMC. A similar increase did not occur for hBEC + hvSMC in vitro, but hBEC + hvSMC in vivo significantly increased PVV ( p = 0.0035) and VD ( p = 0.0087). Morphology/morphometry established that hLEC vessels maintained distinct cell markers, and demonstrated significantly increased individual vessel and network size, and longer survival than hBEC capillaries in vivo, and established inosculation with rat lymphatics, with evidence of lymphatic function. The porous polyurethane scaffold provided advantages to capillary network formation due to its large (300–600 μm diameter) interconnected pores, and sufficient stability to ensure successful surgical transplantation in vivo. Given their successful survival and function in vivo within the porous scaffold, in vitro assembled hLEC networks using this method are potentially applicable to clinical scenarios requiring replacement of dysfunctional or absent lymphatic networks.https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314221140979
spellingShingle Anne M Kong
Shiang Y Lim
Jason A Palmer
Amanda Rixon
Yi-Wen Gerrand
Kiryu K Yap
Wayne A Morrison
Geraldine M Mitchell
Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold
Journal of Tissue Engineering
title Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold
title_full Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold
title_fullStr Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold
title_full_unstemmed Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold
title_short Engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold
title_sort engineering transplantable human lymphatic and blood capillary networks in a porous scaffold
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314221140979
work_keys_str_mv AT annemkong engineeringtransplantablehumanlymphaticandbloodcapillarynetworksinaporousscaffold
AT shiangylim engineeringtransplantablehumanlymphaticandbloodcapillarynetworksinaporousscaffold
AT jasonapalmer engineeringtransplantablehumanlymphaticandbloodcapillarynetworksinaporousscaffold
AT amandarixon engineeringtransplantablehumanlymphaticandbloodcapillarynetworksinaporousscaffold
AT yiwengerrand engineeringtransplantablehumanlymphaticandbloodcapillarynetworksinaporousscaffold
AT kiryukyap engineeringtransplantablehumanlymphaticandbloodcapillarynetworksinaporousscaffold
AT wayneamorrison engineeringtransplantablehumanlymphaticandbloodcapillarynetworksinaporousscaffold
AT geraldinemmitchell engineeringtransplantablehumanlymphaticandbloodcapillarynetworksinaporousscaffold