Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging: Assessment of patient experience

Purpose: To compare patient experience of whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT performed for lymphoma staging. Methods: One-hundred-fifteen patients (59 males, 56 females; 53 Hodgkin, 62 non-Hodgkin; mean age: 43.8 years) with lymphoma underwent whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT for staging and filled a questi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Domenico Albano, Francesco Agnello, Caterina Patti, Ludovico La Grutta, Alberto Bruno, Massimo Midiri, Roberto Lagalla, Massimo Galia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-12-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X17301171
_version_ 1828886089232809984
author Domenico Albano
Francesco Agnello
Caterina Patti
Ludovico La Grutta
Alberto Bruno
Massimo Midiri
Roberto Lagalla
Massimo Galia
author_facet Domenico Albano
Francesco Agnello
Caterina Patti
Ludovico La Grutta
Alberto Bruno
Massimo Midiri
Roberto Lagalla
Massimo Galia
author_sort Domenico Albano
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To compare patient experience of whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT performed for lymphoma staging. Methods: One-hundred-fifteen patients (59 males, 56 females; 53 Hodgkin, 62 non-Hodgkin; mean age: 43.8 years) with lymphoma underwent whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT for staging and filled a questionnaire regarding their experience of the examinations using a 4-point Likert scale (1, very good; 4,very bad). Differences were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Patients were asked to express their preference on both techniques. Preferences were compared on the basis of gender, age, and Ann Arbor stage using the chi-square test. A p-value ≤ .05 was considered significant. Results: Most patients found FDG-PET/CT a more burdensome examination than whole-body MRI. Whole-body MRI received a significantly lower score regarding overall satisfaction (p < .05), patient experience before (p < .05) and after (p < .05) scan. No significant difference was found in scan preparation (p = .207) and patient experience during scan (p = .38). The average Likert scores were <2 in all criteria for both types of scan. 54 patients preferred whole-body MRI, 10 preferred FDG-PET/CT, and 51 had no preference. There was no significant difference in technique preference according to gender (p = .73), age (p = .43), and stage (p = 1.00). Conclusions: Whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT demonstrate high degree of patients’ acceptance and tolerance.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T11:38:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6047c9633244cebb4c32e495ad92e53
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0378-603X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T11:38:26Z
publishDate 2017-12-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b6047c9633244cebb4c32e495ad92e532022-12-21T23:47:43ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine0378-603X2017-12-014841043104710.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.06.002Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging: Assessment of patient experienceDomenico Albano0Francesco Agnello1Caterina Patti2Ludovico La Grutta3Alberto Bruno4Massimo Midiri5Roberto Lagalla6Massimo Galia7Department of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, ItalyDepartment of Hematology I, Azienda Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Viale Strasburgo 233, 90146 Palermo, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, ItalyDepartment of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med., University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, ItalyPurpose: To compare patient experience of whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT performed for lymphoma staging. Methods: One-hundred-fifteen patients (59 males, 56 females; 53 Hodgkin, 62 non-Hodgkin; mean age: 43.8 years) with lymphoma underwent whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT for staging and filled a questionnaire regarding their experience of the examinations using a 4-point Likert scale (1, very good; 4,very bad). Differences were evaluated using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Patients were asked to express their preference on both techniques. Preferences were compared on the basis of gender, age, and Ann Arbor stage using the chi-square test. A p-value ≤ .05 was considered significant. Results: Most patients found FDG-PET/CT a more burdensome examination than whole-body MRI. Whole-body MRI received a significantly lower score regarding overall satisfaction (p < .05), patient experience before (p < .05) and after (p < .05) scan. No significant difference was found in scan preparation (p = .207) and patient experience during scan (p = .38). The average Likert scores were <2 in all criteria for both types of scan. 54 patients preferred whole-body MRI, 10 preferred FDG-PET/CT, and 51 had no preference. There was no significant difference in technique preference according to gender (p = .73), age (p = .43), and stage (p = 1.00). Conclusions: Whole-body MRI and FDG-PET/CT demonstrate high degree of patients’ acceptance and tolerance.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X17301171Magnetic resonance imagingWhole body imagingPositron-emission tomographyLymphomaPatient experience
spellingShingle Domenico Albano
Francesco Agnello
Caterina Patti
Ludovico La Grutta
Alberto Bruno
Massimo Midiri
Roberto Lagalla
Massimo Galia
Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging: Assessment of patient experience
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Magnetic resonance imaging
Whole body imaging
Positron-emission tomography
Lymphoma
Patient experience
title Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging: Assessment of patient experience
title_full Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging: Assessment of patient experience
title_fullStr Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging: Assessment of patient experience
title_full_unstemmed Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging: Assessment of patient experience
title_short Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging: Assessment of patient experience
title_sort whole body magnetic resonance imaging and fdg pet ct for lymphoma staging assessment of patient experience
topic Magnetic resonance imaging
Whole body imaging
Positron-emission tomography
Lymphoma
Patient experience
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X17301171
work_keys_str_mv AT domenicoalbano wholebodymagneticresonanceimagingandfdgpetctforlymphomastagingassessmentofpatientexperience
AT francescoagnello wholebodymagneticresonanceimagingandfdgpetctforlymphomastagingassessmentofpatientexperience
AT caterinapatti wholebodymagneticresonanceimagingandfdgpetctforlymphomastagingassessmentofpatientexperience
AT ludovicolagrutta wholebodymagneticresonanceimagingandfdgpetctforlymphomastagingassessmentofpatientexperience
AT albertobruno wholebodymagneticresonanceimagingandfdgpetctforlymphomastagingassessmentofpatientexperience
AT massimomidiri wholebodymagneticresonanceimagingandfdgpetctforlymphomastagingassessmentofpatientexperience
AT robertolagalla wholebodymagneticresonanceimagingandfdgpetctforlymphomastagingassessmentofpatientexperience
AT massimogalia wholebodymagneticresonanceimagingandfdgpetctforlymphomastagingassessmentofpatientexperience