Correlation between Level of Evidence and Citations in Top 100 Cited Hallux Valgus Articles

Category: Bunion; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: An article's scientific impact has often been measured by the number of citations it receives. A citation analysis can help determine impactful works in medical specialties. The objective of this study is to describe the metrics and level...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vishank V. Panchbhavi Esq
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-12-01
Series:Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00275
_version_ 1797375601259053056
author Vishank V. Panchbhavi Esq
author_facet Vishank V. Panchbhavi Esq
author_sort Vishank V. Panchbhavi Esq
collection DOAJ
description Category: Bunion; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: An article's scientific impact has often been measured by the number of citations it receives. A citation analysis can help determine impactful works in medical specialties. The objective of this study is to describe the metrics and levels of evidence of articles on Hallux valgus. Methods: This study reviewed the top 100 most cited articles available when searching for articles in an electronic database using the keywords “hallux valgus”, and “bunion”. Each article was examined for the number of citations, publication type, journal specialty, authorship, country of origin, year of publication, level of evidence, and total sample size. Results: The number of citations ranged from 68 to 424. The 100 most cited articles were published in 24 journals, spanning from general to more specific subspecialty journals. 45% of articles were published by Foot and Ankle International. The most common level of evidence was V (34 out of 100 articles), and most articles were case series (n = 28) and expert opinion (n = 19). The median sample size in experimental studies was 44. Out of 100 articles, only 3 were randomized controlled trials. Conclusion: The median year of most cited publications, 2003, suggests a need for newer studies reviewing Hallux valgus. The paucity of articles with an evidence level of 1 or 2 and a small median sample size suggests a lack of scientifically rigorous studies reviewing Hallux valgus. There is a weak positive correlation between strength of evidence and number of citations in the top 100 articles cited on Hallux valgus (r= 0.149).
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:26:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b613ceabbac04423906a500659d5c549
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2473-0114
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:26:45Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-b613ceabbac04423906a500659d5c5492023-12-26T08:03:48ZengSAGE PublishingFoot & Ankle Orthopaedics2473-01142023-12-01810.1177/2473011423S00275Correlation between Level of Evidence and Citations in Top 100 Cited Hallux Valgus ArticlesVishank V. Panchbhavi EsqCategory: Bunion; Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: An article's scientific impact has often been measured by the number of citations it receives. A citation analysis can help determine impactful works in medical specialties. The objective of this study is to describe the metrics and levels of evidence of articles on Hallux valgus. Methods: This study reviewed the top 100 most cited articles available when searching for articles in an electronic database using the keywords “hallux valgus”, and “bunion”. Each article was examined for the number of citations, publication type, journal specialty, authorship, country of origin, year of publication, level of evidence, and total sample size. Results: The number of citations ranged from 68 to 424. The 100 most cited articles were published in 24 journals, spanning from general to more specific subspecialty journals. 45% of articles were published by Foot and Ankle International. The most common level of evidence was V (34 out of 100 articles), and most articles were case series (n = 28) and expert opinion (n = 19). The median sample size in experimental studies was 44. Out of 100 articles, only 3 were randomized controlled trials. Conclusion: The median year of most cited publications, 2003, suggests a need for newer studies reviewing Hallux valgus. The paucity of articles with an evidence level of 1 or 2 and a small median sample size suggests a lack of scientifically rigorous studies reviewing Hallux valgus. There is a weak positive correlation between strength of evidence and number of citations in the top 100 articles cited on Hallux valgus (r= 0.149).https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00275
spellingShingle Vishank V. Panchbhavi Esq
Correlation between Level of Evidence and Citations in Top 100 Cited Hallux Valgus Articles
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
title Correlation between Level of Evidence and Citations in Top 100 Cited Hallux Valgus Articles
title_full Correlation between Level of Evidence and Citations in Top 100 Cited Hallux Valgus Articles
title_fullStr Correlation between Level of Evidence and Citations in Top 100 Cited Hallux Valgus Articles
title_full_unstemmed Correlation between Level of Evidence and Citations in Top 100 Cited Hallux Valgus Articles
title_short Correlation between Level of Evidence and Citations in Top 100 Cited Hallux Valgus Articles
title_sort correlation between level of evidence and citations in top 100 cited hallux valgus articles
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011423S00275
work_keys_str_mv AT vishankvpanchbhaviesq correlationbetweenlevelofevidenceandcitationsintop100citedhalluxvalgusarticles