Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Researchers in the medical sciences prefer employing Cox model for survival analysis. In some cases, however, parametric methods can provide more accurate estimates. In this study, we used Weibull model to analyze the prognostic fact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu Shun F, Adnan Ahmed, Yu Chuan H, Xia Xin, Zhu Hui P, Du Yu K
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-01-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/1
_version_ 1818212451928244224
author Liu Shun F
Adnan Ahmed
Yu Chuan H
Xia Xin
Zhu Hui P
Du Yu K
author_facet Liu Shun F
Adnan Ahmed
Yu Chuan H
Xia Xin
Zhu Hui P
Du Yu K
author_sort Liu Shun F
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Researchers in the medical sciences prefer employing Cox model for survival analysis. In some cases, however, parametric methods can provide more accurate estimates. In this study, we used Weibull model to analyze the prognostic factors in patients with gastric cancer and compared with Cox.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We retrospectively studied 1715 patients with gastric cancer. Age at diagnosis, gender, family history, past medical history, tumor location, tumor size, eradicative degree of surgery, depth of tumor invasion, combined evisceration, pathologic stage, histologic grade and lymph node status were chosen as potential prognostic factors. Weibull and Cox model were performed with hazard rate and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to compare the efficiency of models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results from both Weibull and Cox indicated that patients with the past history of having gastric cancer had the risk of death increased significantly followed by poorly differentiated or moderately differentiated in histologic grade. Eradicative degree of surgery, pathologic stage, depth of tumor invasion and tumor location were also identified as independent prognostic factors found significant. Age was significant only in Weibull model.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>From the results of multivariate analysis, the data strongly supported the Weibull can elicit more precise results as an alternative to Cox based on AIC.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:48:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6156305a7a7489a862c79877eb2f526
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-230X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:48:37Z
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-b6156305a7a7489a862c79877eb2f5262022-12-22T00:35:44ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2011-01-01111110.1186/1471-230X-11-1Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancerLiu Shun FAdnan AhmedYu Chuan HXia XinZhu Hui PDu Yu K<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Researchers in the medical sciences prefer employing Cox model for survival analysis. In some cases, however, parametric methods can provide more accurate estimates. In this study, we used Weibull model to analyze the prognostic factors in patients with gastric cancer and compared with Cox.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We retrospectively studied 1715 patients with gastric cancer. Age at diagnosis, gender, family history, past medical history, tumor location, tumor size, eradicative degree of surgery, depth of tumor invasion, combined evisceration, pathologic stage, histologic grade and lymph node status were chosen as potential prognostic factors. Weibull and Cox model were performed with hazard rate and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) to compare the efficiency of models.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results from both Weibull and Cox indicated that patients with the past history of having gastric cancer had the risk of death increased significantly followed by poorly differentiated or moderately differentiated in histologic grade. Eradicative degree of surgery, pathologic stage, depth of tumor invasion and tumor location were also identified as independent prognostic factors found significant. Age was significant only in Weibull model.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>From the results of multivariate analysis, the data strongly supported the Weibull can elicit more precise results as an alternative to Cox based on AIC.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/1
spellingShingle Liu Shun F
Adnan Ahmed
Yu Chuan H
Xia Xin
Zhu Hui P
Du Yu K
Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer
BMC Gastroenterology
title Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer
title_full Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer
title_fullStr Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer
title_full_unstemmed Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer
title_short Application of Weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer
title_sort application of weibull model for survival of patients with gastric cancer
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/11/1
work_keys_str_mv AT liushunf applicationofweibullmodelforsurvivalofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT adnanahmed applicationofweibullmodelforsurvivalofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT yuchuanh applicationofweibullmodelforsurvivalofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT xiaxin applicationofweibullmodelforsurvivalofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT zhuhuip applicationofweibullmodelforsurvivalofpatientswithgastriccancer
AT duyuk applicationofweibullmodelforsurvivalofpatientswithgastriccancer