Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume

Background: Robotic surgery is an appealing option for both surgeons and patients. The question around the introduction of new surgical technology, such as robotics, with the potential link to increased procedure-specific volume has not been addressed. We hypothesize that hospital adoption of roboti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily A. Grimsley, MD, Tara M. Barry, MD, Haroon Janjua, MSc, Emanuel Eguia, MD, Christopher DuCoin, MD, Paul C. Kuo, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-10-01
Series:Surgery Open Science
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845022000392
_version_ 1818194957787201536
author Emily A. Grimsley, MD
Tara M. Barry, MD
Haroon Janjua, MSc
Emanuel Eguia, MD
Christopher DuCoin, MD
Paul C. Kuo, MD
author_facet Emily A. Grimsley, MD
Tara M. Barry, MD
Haroon Janjua, MSc
Emanuel Eguia, MD
Christopher DuCoin, MD
Paul C. Kuo, MD
author_sort Emily A. Grimsley, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Robotic surgery is an appealing option for both surgeons and patients. The question around the introduction of new surgical technology, such as robotics, with the potential link to increased procedure-specific volume has not been addressed. We hypothesize that hospital adoption of robotic technology increases the total volume of specific procedures as compared to nonrobotic hospitals. Methods: The 2010–2020 Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Inpatient database was queried for open, laparoscopic, and robotic colectomy, lobectomy, gastric bypass, and antireflux procedures. International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, codes were used. Difference in difference method was used to evaluate the impact of robotics on total procedure-specific volume of robotic hospitals versus nonrobotic hospitals before and after adopting robotic technology. Incident rate ratios from the difference in difference analysis determined the significance of adding robotics. Patient demographics were evaluated using χ2 test. Results: A total of 291,826 procedures were performed at 217 hospitals, 151 with robotic capabilities. Robotic hospitals experienced a 37% increase in surgical volume due to robotic technology (incident rate ratio 1.37, P < .05), which was consistent for each surgery except antireflux procedures (incident rate ratio 0.95). Robotic procedures had significantly higher charges for medical/surgical supplies; however, the mean length of stay for robotic procedures was significantly shorter than that of laparoscopic and open cases. Conclusion: Hospital adoption of robotic technology significantly increases surgical volume for select procedures. Hospitals should consider the benefits of introducing robotic technology which leads to higher volume and decreased length of stay, benefitting both hospital systems and patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T01:10:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6260bb5b61b4d79ba79aec0c0cc79fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-8450
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T01:10:33Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Surgery Open Science
spelling doaj.art-b6260bb5b61b4d79ba79aec0c0cc79fb2022-12-22T00:43:29ZengElsevierSurgery Open Science2589-84502022-10-01103642Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volumeEmily A. Grimsley, MD0Tara M. Barry, MD1Haroon Janjua, MSc2Emanuel Eguia, MD3Christopher DuCoin, MD4Paul C. Kuo, MD5Department of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA; Corresponding author at: Department of Surgery, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, 2 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, FL 33606. Tel: 813-974-4115; fax: 813-974-4115.Department of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USADepartment of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USALoyola University Chicago Stritch School Of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USADepartment of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USADepartment of Surgery, USF Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USABackground: Robotic surgery is an appealing option for both surgeons and patients. The question around the introduction of new surgical technology, such as robotics, with the potential link to increased procedure-specific volume has not been addressed. We hypothesize that hospital adoption of robotic technology increases the total volume of specific procedures as compared to nonrobotic hospitals. Methods: The 2010–2020 Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Inpatient database was queried for open, laparoscopic, and robotic colectomy, lobectomy, gastric bypass, and antireflux procedures. International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions, codes were used. Difference in difference method was used to evaluate the impact of robotics on total procedure-specific volume of robotic hospitals versus nonrobotic hospitals before and after adopting robotic technology. Incident rate ratios from the difference in difference analysis determined the significance of adding robotics. Patient demographics were evaluated using χ2 test. Results: A total of 291,826 procedures were performed at 217 hospitals, 151 with robotic capabilities. Robotic hospitals experienced a 37% increase in surgical volume due to robotic technology (incident rate ratio 1.37, P < .05), which was consistent for each surgery except antireflux procedures (incident rate ratio 0.95). Robotic procedures had significantly higher charges for medical/surgical supplies; however, the mean length of stay for robotic procedures was significantly shorter than that of laparoscopic and open cases. Conclusion: Hospital adoption of robotic technology significantly increases surgical volume for select procedures. Hospitals should consider the benefits of introducing robotic technology which leads to higher volume and decreased length of stay, benefitting both hospital systems and patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845022000392
spellingShingle Emily A. Grimsley, MD
Tara M. Barry, MD
Haroon Janjua, MSc
Emanuel Eguia, MD
Christopher DuCoin, MD
Paul C. Kuo, MD
Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume
Surgery Open Science
title Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume
title_full Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume
title_fullStr Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume
title_short Exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume
title_sort exploring the paradigm of robotic surgery and its contribution to the growth of surgical volume
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845022000392
work_keys_str_mv AT emilyagrimsleymd exploringtheparadigmofroboticsurgeryanditscontributiontothegrowthofsurgicalvolume
AT tarambarrymd exploringtheparadigmofroboticsurgeryanditscontributiontothegrowthofsurgicalvolume
AT haroonjanjuamsc exploringtheparadigmofroboticsurgeryanditscontributiontothegrowthofsurgicalvolume
AT emanueleguiamd exploringtheparadigmofroboticsurgeryanditscontributiontothegrowthofsurgicalvolume
AT christopherducoinmd exploringtheparadigmofroboticsurgeryanditscontributiontothegrowthofsurgicalvolume
AT paulckuomd exploringtheparadigmofroboticsurgeryanditscontributiontothegrowthofsurgicalvolume