Should We Reconsider the Necessity of a Refinement of Prostate Cancer Risk Classification and Radiotherapy Treatment Strategy? Experiences from a Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single Institution

Background: Radiation therapy has undergone significant technical development in the past decade. However, the complex therapy of intermediate-risk patients with organ-confined prostate carcinoma still poses many questions. Our retrospective study investigated the impact of selected components of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Viktória Temesfői, Róbert Herczeg, Zoltán Lőcsei, Klára Sebestyén, Zsolt Sebestyén, László Mangel, Miklós Damásdi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/1/110
_version_ 1797543038809014272
author Viktória Temesfői
Róbert Herczeg
Zoltán Lőcsei
Klára Sebestyén
Zsolt Sebestyén
László Mangel
Miklós Damásdi
author_facet Viktória Temesfői
Róbert Herczeg
Zoltán Lőcsei
Klára Sebestyén
Zsolt Sebestyén
László Mangel
Miklós Damásdi
author_sort Viktória Temesfői
collection DOAJ
description Background: Radiation therapy has undergone significant technical development in the past decade. However, the complex therapy of intermediate-risk patients with organ-confined prostate carcinoma still poses many questions. Our retrospective study investigated the impact of selected components of the treatment process including radiotherapy, hormone deprivation, risk classification, and patients’ response to therapy. Methods: The impact of delivered dose, planning accuracy, duration of hormone deprivation, risk classification, and the time to reach prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir state were analyzed among ninety-nine individuals afflicted with organ-confined disease. Progression was defined as a radiological or biochemical relapse within five years from radiotherapy treatment. Results: We found that 58.3% of the progressive population consisted of intermediate-risk patients. The progression rate in the intermediate group was higher (21.9%) than in the high-risk population (12.1%). Dividing the intermediate group, according to the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recommendations, resulted in the non-favorable subgroup having the highest rate of progression (33.3%) and depicting the lowest percentage of progression-free survival (66.7%). Conclusion: Extended pelvic irradiation on the regional lymph nodes may be necessary for the ISUP Grade 3 subgroup, similarly to the high-risk treatment. Therapy optimization regarding the intermediate-risk population based on the ISUP subgrouping suggestions is highly recommended in the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T13:39:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b62a2aa2a6c14a8d8a54d4a4a7615805
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T13:39:00Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b62a2aa2a6c14a8d8a54d4a4a76158052023-11-21T03:12:12ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-12-0110111010.3390/jcm10010110Should We Reconsider the Necessity of a Refinement of Prostate Cancer Risk Classification and Radiotherapy Treatment Strategy? Experiences from a Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single InstitutionViktória Temesfői0Róbert Herczeg1Zoltán Lőcsei2Klára Sebestyén3Zsolt Sebestyén4László Mangel5Miklós Damásdi6Lab-on-a-Chip Research Group, János Szentágothai Research Center, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Ifjúság útja 20, HungaryBioinformatics Research Group, Genomic and Bioinformatics Core Facility, János Szentágothai Research Center, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Ifjúság útja 20, HungaryDepartment of Oncotherapy, Clinical Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Édesanyák útja 10, HungaryDepartment of Oncotherapy, Clinical Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Édesanyák útja 10, HungaryDepartment of Oncotherapy, Clinical Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Édesanyák útja 10, HungaryDepartment of Oncotherapy, Clinical Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7624 Pécs, Édesanyák útja 10, HungaryUrology Clinic, Clinical Centre, Medical School, University of Pécs, H-7621 Pécs, Munkácsy Mihály utca 2, HungaryBackground: Radiation therapy has undergone significant technical development in the past decade. However, the complex therapy of intermediate-risk patients with organ-confined prostate carcinoma still poses many questions. Our retrospective study investigated the impact of selected components of the treatment process including radiotherapy, hormone deprivation, risk classification, and patients’ response to therapy. Methods: The impact of delivered dose, planning accuracy, duration of hormone deprivation, risk classification, and the time to reach prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir state were analyzed among ninety-nine individuals afflicted with organ-confined disease. Progression was defined as a radiological or biochemical relapse within five years from radiotherapy treatment. Results: We found that 58.3% of the progressive population consisted of intermediate-risk patients. The progression rate in the intermediate group was higher (21.9%) than in the high-risk population (12.1%). Dividing the intermediate group, according to the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recommendations, resulted in the non-favorable subgroup having the highest rate of progression (33.3%) and depicting the lowest percentage of progression-free survival (66.7%). Conclusion: Extended pelvic irradiation on the regional lymph nodes may be necessary for the ISUP Grade 3 subgroup, similarly to the high-risk treatment. Therapy optimization regarding the intermediate-risk population based on the ISUP subgrouping suggestions is highly recommended in the treatment of organ-confined prostate cancer.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/1/110prostate cancerradiotherapyandrogen deprivation therapytherapy optimization
spellingShingle Viktória Temesfői
Róbert Herczeg
Zoltán Lőcsei
Klára Sebestyén
Zsolt Sebestyén
László Mangel
Miklós Damásdi
Should We Reconsider the Necessity of a Refinement of Prostate Cancer Risk Classification and Radiotherapy Treatment Strategy? Experiences from a Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single Institution
Journal of Clinical Medicine
prostate cancer
radiotherapy
androgen deprivation therapy
therapy optimization
title Should We Reconsider the Necessity of a Refinement of Prostate Cancer Risk Classification and Radiotherapy Treatment Strategy? Experiences from a Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single Institution
title_full Should We Reconsider the Necessity of a Refinement of Prostate Cancer Risk Classification and Radiotherapy Treatment Strategy? Experiences from a Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single Institution
title_fullStr Should We Reconsider the Necessity of a Refinement of Prostate Cancer Risk Classification and Radiotherapy Treatment Strategy? Experiences from a Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single Institution
title_full_unstemmed Should We Reconsider the Necessity of a Refinement of Prostate Cancer Risk Classification and Radiotherapy Treatment Strategy? Experiences from a Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single Institution
title_short Should We Reconsider the Necessity of a Refinement of Prostate Cancer Risk Classification and Radiotherapy Treatment Strategy? Experiences from a Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single Institution
title_sort should we reconsider the necessity of a refinement of prostate cancer risk classification and radiotherapy treatment strategy experiences from a retrospective analysis of data from a single institution
topic prostate cancer
radiotherapy
androgen deprivation therapy
therapy optimization
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/1/110
work_keys_str_mv AT viktoriatemesfoi shouldwereconsiderthenecessityofarefinementofprostatecancerriskclassificationandradiotherapytreatmentstrategyexperiencesfromaretrospectiveanalysisofdatafromasingleinstitution
AT robertherczeg shouldwereconsiderthenecessityofarefinementofprostatecancerriskclassificationandradiotherapytreatmentstrategyexperiencesfromaretrospectiveanalysisofdatafromasingleinstitution
AT zoltanlocsei shouldwereconsiderthenecessityofarefinementofprostatecancerriskclassificationandradiotherapytreatmentstrategyexperiencesfromaretrospectiveanalysisofdatafromasingleinstitution
AT klarasebestyen shouldwereconsiderthenecessityofarefinementofprostatecancerriskclassificationandradiotherapytreatmentstrategyexperiencesfromaretrospectiveanalysisofdatafromasingleinstitution
AT zsoltsebestyen shouldwereconsiderthenecessityofarefinementofprostatecancerriskclassificationandradiotherapytreatmentstrategyexperiencesfromaretrospectiveanalysisofdatafromasingleinstitution
AT laszlomangel shouldwereconsiderthenecessityofarefinementofprostatecancerriskclassificationandradiotherapytreatmentstrategyexperiencesfromaretrospectiveanalysisofdatafromasingleinstitution
AT miklosdamasdi shouldwereconsiderthenecessityofarefinementofprostatecancerriskclassificationandradiotherapytreatmentstrategyexperiencesfromaretrospectiveanalysisofdatafromasingleinstitution