Composite restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions—Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable?
Abstract The purpose of this in‐vivo study was to evaluate the clinical performance of restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions (NCCLs), using different cavity preparation designs, after 7.7 years. A total of 85 NCCLs with coronal margins in enamel and cervical margins in dentin were rand...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | Clinical and Experimental Dental Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.310 |
| _version_ | 1818882683001896960 |
|---|---|
| author | Anne‐Katrin Lührs Silke Jacker‐Guhr Hüsamettin Günay Peggy Herrmann |
| author_facet | Anne‐Katrin Lührs Silke Jacker‐Guhr Hüsamettin Günay Peggy Herrmann |
| author_sort | Anne‐Katrin Lührs |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The purpose of this in‐vivo study was to evaluate the clinical performance of restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions (NCCLs), using different cavity preparation designs, after 7.7 years. A total of 85 NCCLs with coronal margins in enamel and cervical margins in dentin were randomly assigned to the following treatment protocols: dentin surface cleaning, dentin surface roughening with round bur plus flowable composite, dentin surface roughening/cervical groove preparation with round bur, dentin surface roughening/cervical groove preparation with round bur plus flowable composite. After enamel beveling and selective enamel etching, the defects were restored with composite. The restorations were assessed by two independent, calibrated and blinded investigators, using modified USPHS criteria. At 7 years (7.7 (± 0.35)), a total of 64 restorations (75.3%) were available for follow‐up examination. The total retention rate, irrespective of the test groups, was 82.8%. Restorations placed without any preparation showed the highest loss rate (27.8%). Esthetic appearance, marginal adaptation, anatomic form and marginal discoloration did not differ significantly between the groups. Composites are long‐term stable materials for restoring NCCLs. Restorations placed without any dentin preparation (cavity cleaning only) showed the highest loss rate. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T15:21:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b63214052ebb4eaf91effcf4cab93508 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2057-4347 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T15:21:39Z |
| publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Clinical and Experimental Dental Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-b63214052ebb4eaf91effcf4cab935082022-12-21T20:15:59ZengWileyClinical and Experimental Dental Research2057-43472020-10-016555856710.1002/cre2.310Composite restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions—Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable?Anne‐Katrin Lührs0Silke Jacker‐Guhr1Hüsamettin Günay2Peggy Herrmann3Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry Hannover Medical School Hannover GermanyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry Hannover Medical School Hannover GermanyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry Hannover Medical School Hannover GermanyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry Hannover Medical School Hannover GermanyAbstract The purpose of this in‐vivo study was to evaluate the clinical performance of restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions (NCCLs), using different cavity preparation designs, after 7.7 years. A total of 85 NCCLs with coronal margins in enamel and cervical margins in dentin were randomly assigned to the following treatment protocols: dentin surface cleaning, dentin surface roughening with round bur plus flowable composite, dentin surface roughening/cervical groove preparation with round bur, dentin surface roughening/cervical groove preparation with round bur plus flowable composite. After enamel beveling and selective enamel etching, the defects were restored with composite. The restorations were assessed by two independent, calibrated and blinded investigators, using modified USPHS criteria. At 7 years (7.7 (± 0.35)), a total of 64 restorations (75.3%) were available for follow‐up examination. The total retention rate, irrespective of the test groups, was 82.8%. Restorations placed without any preparation showed the highest loss rate (27.8%). Esthetic appearance, marginal adaptation, anatomic form and marginal discoloration did not differ significantly between the groups. Composites are long‐term stable materials for restoring NCCLs. Restorations placed without any dentin preparation (cavity cleaning only) showed the highest loss rate.https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.310cavity preparation designclass V‐lesionsin‐vivo studyNCCLnon‐carious cervical lesionsUSPHS criteria |
| spellingShingle | Anne‐Katrin Lührs Silke Jacker‐Guhr Hüsamettin Günay Peggy Herrmann Composite restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions—Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable? Clinical and Experimental Dental Research cavity preparation design class V‐lesions in‐vivo study NCCL non‐carious cervical lesions USPHS criteria |
| title | Composite restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions—Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable? |
| title_full | Composite restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions—Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable? |
| title_fullStr | Composite restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions—Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Composite restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions—Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable? |
| title_short | Composite restorations placed in non‐carious cervical lesions—Which cavity preparation is clinically reliable? |
| title_sort | composite restorations placed in non carious cervical lesions which cavity preparation is clinically reliable |
| topic | cavity preparation design class V‐lesions in‐vivo study NCCL non‐carious cervical lesions USPHS criteria |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.310 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT annekatrinluhrs compositerestorationsplacedinnoncariouscervicallesionswhichcavitypreparationisclinicallyreliable AT silkejackerguhr compositerestorationsplacedinnoncariouscervicallesionswhichcavitypreparationisclinicallyreliable AT husamettingunay compositerestorationsplacedinnoncariouscervicallesionswhichcavitypreparationisclinicallyreliable AT peggyherrmann compositerestorationsplacedinnoncariouscervicallesionswhichcavitypreparationisclinicallyreliable |