Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18 lipca 2012 r., sygn. akt III CZP 40/12, OSNC 2013/2/18

The resolution of the High Court positively answers the question whether the guardian, mentioned in paragraph 42 of the Polish Civil Code, should also be appointed in a situation, when the management board has unfilled posts. Due to paragraph 42 the resolution is right but it gives no practical solu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Karolina Ziemianin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego 2015-01-01
Series:Acta Iuris Stetinensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wnus.edu.pl/ais/pl/issue/97/article/669/
_version_ 1818437313270644736
author Karolina Ziemianin
author_facet Karolina Ziemianin
author_sort Karolina Ziemianin
collection DOAJ
description The resolution of the High Court positively answers the question whether the guardian, mentioned in paragraph 42 of the Polish Civil Code, should also be appointed in a situation, when the management board has unfilled posts. Due to paragraph 42 the resolution is right but it gives no practical solution in the case which was decided by the Court. The guardian should be appointed only to liquidate the foundation, when the foundation’s organs cannot effectively make decisions. Translated by Karolina Ziemianin
first_indexed 2024-12-14T17:22:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b633ecc564014caa8e7f9757475103c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2083-4373
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T17:22:41Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
record_format Article
series Acta Iuris Stetinensis
spelling doaj.art-b633ecc564014caa8e7f9757475103c92022-12-21T22:53:18ZengWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu SzczecińskiegoActa Iuris Stetinensis2083-43732015-01-019Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18 lipca 2012 r., sygn. akt III CZP 40/12, OSNC 2013/2/18Karolina Ziemianin0Uniwersytet SzczecińskiThe resolution of the High Court positively answers the question whether the guardian, mentioned in paragraph 42 of the Polish Civil Code, should also be appointed in a situation, when the management board has unfilled posts. Due to paragraph 42 the resolution is right but it gives no practical solution in the case which was decided by the Court. The guardian should be appointed only to liquidate the foundation, when the foundation’s organs cannot effectively make decisions. Translated by Karolina Ziemianinhttps://wnus.edu.pl/ais/pl/issue/97/article/669/management boardunfilled postsguardianfoundation
spellingShingle Karolina Ziemianin
Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18 lipca 2012 r., sygn. akt III CZP 40/12, OSNC 2013/2/18
Acta Iuris Stetinensis
management board
unfilled posts
guardian
foundation
title Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18 lipca 2012 r., sygn. akt III CZP 40/12, OSNC 2013/2/18
title_full Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18 lipca 2012 r., sygn. akt III CZP 40/12, OSNC 2013/2/18
title_fullStr Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18 lipca 2012 r., sygn. akt III CZP 40/12, OSNC 2013/2/18
title_full_unstemmed Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18 lipca 2012 r., sygn. akt III CZP 40/12, OSNC 2013/2/18
title_short Glosa do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 18 lipca 2012 r., sygn. akt III CZP 40/12, OSNC 2013/2/18
title_sort glosa do uchwaly sadu najwyzszego z dnia 18 lipca 2012 r sygn akt iii czp 40 12 osnc 2013 2 18
topic management board
unfilled posts
guardian
foundation
url https://wnus.edu.pl/ais/pl/issue/97/article/669/
work_keys_str_mv AT karolinaziemianin glosadouchwałysadunajwyzszegozdnia18lipca2012rsygnaktiiiczp4012osnc2013218