The Major Depression Inventory for diagnosing according to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11: Psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general population
Abstract Objectives The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) was constructed to assess DSM‐IV and ICD‐10 depression symptoms, and does not fully cover the symptoms listed in DSM‐5 and ICD‐11. This study aimed to augment the MDI to the new diagnostic standards by adding a new item, and to assess and comp...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1966 |
| _version_ | 1797403181403078656 |
|---|---|
| author | Andreas Lundin Jette Möller Yvonne Forsell |
| author_facet | Andreas Lundin Jette Möller Yvonne Forsell |
| author_sort | Andreas Lundin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Objectives The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) was constructed to assess DSM‐IV and ICD‐10 depression symptoms, and does not fully cover the symptoms listed in DSM‐5 and ICD‐11. This study aimed to augment the MDI to the new diagnostic standards by adding a new item, and to assess and compare the measurement performance of the MDI items and diagnostic algorithms for major depression according to DSM‐IV, ICD‐10, DSM‐5 and ICD‐11. Methods Surveys collected 2001–2003 and 2021, including self‐assessed MDI were used. A new hopelessness item was constructed and analyzed alongside the hopelessness item in the Symptom Checklist. The performance of items was compared using Rasch and Mokken analyses. Criterion validity was examined using equivalent diagnoses from psychiatric interview (Schedules for Clinical Assessments in Neuropsychiatry [SCAN]) as standard. Results MDI information was provided by 8511 individuals in 2001–2003 (SCAN subsample n = 878), and 8863 in 2021. All items, including hopelessness had good psychometric properties. Sensitivity ranged between 56% and 70%, and specificity between 95% and 96%, indicating similar criterion validity. Conclusions Hopelessness and the MDI items had good psychometrics. MDI for DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 had similar validity as for DSM‐IV and ICD‐10. We recommend that MDI is updated to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 by adding a hopelessness item. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:34:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-b63855963ac04f348ff1cddf78f19000 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1049-8931 1557-0657 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:34:47Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-b63855963ac04f348ff1cddf78f190002023-12-06T11:11:08ZengWileyInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research1049-89311557-06572023-12-01324n/an/a10.1002/mpr.1966The Major Depression Inventory for diagnosing according to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11: Psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general populationAndreas Lundin0Jette Möller1Yvonne Forsell2Department of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenAbstract Objectives The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) was constructed to assess DSM‐IV and ICD‐10 depression symptoms, and does not fully cover the symptoms listed in DSM‐5 and ICD‐11. This study aimed to augment the MDI to the new diagnostic standards by adding a new item, and to assess and compare the measurement performance of the MDI items and diagnostic algorithms for major depression according to DSM‐IV, ICD‐10, DSM‐5 and ICD‐11. Methods Surveys collected 2001–2003 and 2021, including self‐assessed MDI were used. A new hopelessness item was constructed and analyzed alongside the hopelessness item in the Symptom Checklist. The performance of items was compared using Rasch and Mokken analyses. Criterion validity was examined using equivalent diagnoses from psychiatric interview (Schedules for Clinical Assessments in Neuropsychiatry [SCAN]) as standard. Results MDI information was provided by 8511 individuals in 2001–2003 (SCAN subsample n = 878), and 8863 in 2021. All items, including hopelessness had good psychometric properties. Sensitivity ranged between 56% and 70%, and specificity between 95% and 96%, indicating similar criterion validity. Conclusions Hopelessness and the MDI items had good psychometrics. MDI for DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 had similar validity as for DSM‐IV and ICD‐10. We recommend that MDI is updated to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11 by adding a hopelessness item.https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1966diagnostic test accuracyDSM‐IVICD‐10MDIsensitivity and specificity |
| spellingShingle | Andreas Lundin Jette Möller Yvonne Forsell The Major Depression Inventory for diagnosing according to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11: Psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general population International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research diagnostic test accuracy DSM‐IV ICD‐10 MDI sensitivity and specificity |
| title | The Major Depression Inventory for diagnosing according to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11: Psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general population |
| title_full | The Major Depression Inventory for diagnosing according to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11: Psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general population |
| title_fullStr | The Major Depression Inventory for diagnosing according to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11: Psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general population |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Major Depression Inventory for diagnosing according to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11: Psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general population |
| title_short | The Major Depression Inventory for diagnosing according to DSM‐5 and ICD‐11: Psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general population |
| title_sort | major depression inventory for diagnosing according to dsm 5 and icd 11 psychometric properties and validity in a swedish general population |
| topic | diagnostic test accuracy DSM‐IV ICD‐10 MDI sensitivity and specificity |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1966 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreaslundin themajordepressioninventoryfordiagnosingaccordingtodsm5andicd11psychometricpropertiesandvalidityinaswedishgeneralpopulation AT jettemoller themajordepressioninventoryfordiagnosingaccordingtodsm5andicd11psychometricpropertiesandvalidityinaswedishgeneralpopulation AT yvonneforsell themajordepressioninventoryfordiagnosingaccordingtodsm5andicd11psychometricpropertiesandvalidityinaswedishgeneralpopulation AT andreaslundin majordepressioninventoryfordiagnosingaccordingtodsm5andicd11psychometricpropertiesandvalidityinaswedishgeneralpopulation AT jettemoller majordepressioninventoryfordiagnosingaccordingtodsm5andicd11psychometricpropertiesandvalidityinaswedishgeneralpopulation AT yvonneforsell majordepressioninventoryfordiagnosingaccordingtodsm5andicd11psychometricpropertiesandvalidityinaswedishgeneralpopulation |