A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.

BACKGROUND: A variety of human activities have led to the recent global decline of reef-building corals. The ecological, social, and economic value of coral reefs has made them an international conservation priority. The success of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in restoring fish populations has led...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth R Selig, John F Bruno
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2822846?pdf=render
_version_ 1819265261102956544
author Elizabeth R Selig
John F Bruno
author_facet Elizabeth R Selig
John F Bruno
author_sort Elizabeth R Selig
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: A variety of human activities have led to the recent global decline of reef-building corals. The ecological, social, and economic value of coral reefs has made them an international conservation priority. The success of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in restoring fish populations has led to optimism that they could also benefit corals by indirectly reducing threats like overfishing, which cause coral degradation and mortality. However, the general efficacy of MPAs in increasing coral reef resilience has never been tested. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compiled a global database of 8534 live coral cover surveys from 1969-2006 to compare annual changes in coral cover inside 310 MPAs to unprotected areas. We found that on average, coral cover within MPAs remained constant, while coral cover on unprotected reefs declined. Although the short-term differences between unprotected and protected reefs are modest, they could be significant over the long-term if the effects are temporally consistent. Our results also suggest that older MPAs were generally more effective in preventing coral loss. Initially, coral cover continued to decrease after MPA establishment. Several years later, however, rates of coral cover decline slowed and then stabilized so that further losses stopped. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that MPAs can be a useful tool not only for fisheries management, but also for maintaining coral cover. Furthermore, the benefits of MPAs appear to increase with the number of years since MPA establishment. Given the time needed to maximize MPA benefits, there should be increased emphasis on implementing new MPAs and strengthening the enforcement of existing MPAs.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T20:42:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b64aa0ccca3b46c0a97b0bc8d03b8023
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T20:42:34Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-b64aa0ccca3b46c0a97b0bc8d03b80232022-12-21T17:31:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-01-0152e927810.1371/journal.pone.0009278A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.Elizabeth R SeligJohn F BrunoBACKGROUND: A variety of human activities have led to the recent global decline of reef-building corals. The ecological, social, and economic value of coral reefs has made them an international conservation priority. The success of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) in restoring fish populations has led to optimism that they could also benefit corals by indirectly reducing threats like overfishing, which cause coral degradation and mortality. However, the general efficacy of MPAs in increasing coral reef resilience has never been tested. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compiled a global database of 8534 live coral cover surveys from 1969-2006 to compare annual changes in coral cover inside 310 MPAs to unprotected areas. We found that on average, coral cover within MPAs remained constant, while coral cover on unprotected reefs declined. Although the short-term differences between unprotected and protected reefs are modest, they could be significant over the long-term if the effects are temporally consistent. Our results also suggest that older MPAs were generally more effective in preventing coral loss. Initially, coral cover continued to decrease after MPA establishment. Several years later, however, rates of coral cover decline slowed and then stabilized so that further losses stopped. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest that MPAs can be a useful tool not only for fisheries management, but also for maintaining coral cover. Furthermore, the benefits of MPAs appear to increase with the number of years since MPA establishment. Given the time needed to maximize MPA benefits, there should be increased emphasis on implementing new MPAs and strengthening the enforcement of existing MPAs.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2822846?pdf=render
spellingShingle Elizabeth R Selig
John F Bruno
A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.
PLoS ONE
title A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.
title_full A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.
title_fullStr A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.
title_full_unstemmed A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.
title_short A global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss.
title_sort global analysis of the effectiveness of marine protected areas in preventing coral loss
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2822846?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethrselig aglobalanalysisoftheeffectivenessofmarineprotectedareasinpreventingcoralloss
AT johnfbruno aglobalanalysisoftheeffectivenessofmarineprotectedareasinpreventingcoralloss
AT elizabethrselig globalanalysisoftheeffectivenessofmarineprotectedareasinpreventingcoralloss
AT johnfbruno globalanalysisoftheeffectivenessofmarineprotectedareasinpreventingcoralloss