Comparison of PCWP and LVEDP Measurements in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI—Same Same but Different?

Background: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) are often used as equivalents for determination of pulmonary hypertension (PH). PH is a comorbidity in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and associated with limited prognosis. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elke Boxhammer, Moritz Mirna, Laura Bäz, Brunilda Alushi, Marcus Franz, Daniel Kretzschmar, Uta C. Hoppe, Alexander Lauten, Michael Lichtenauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/11/2978
_version_ 1797492981558673408
author Elke Boxhammer
Moritz Mirna
Laura Bäz
Brunilda Alushi
Marcus Franz
Daniel Kretzschmar
Uta C. Hoppe
Alexander Lauten
Michael Lichtenauer
author_facet Elke Boxhammer
Moritz Mirna
Laura Bäz
Brunilda Alushi
Marcus Franz
Daniel Kretzschmar
Uta C. Hoppe
Alexander Lauten
Michael Lichtenauer
author_sort Elke Boxhammer
collection DOAJ
description Background: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) are often used as equivalents for determination of pulmonary hypertension (PH). PH is a comorbidity in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and associated with limited prognosis. The aim of the study was to examine the role of differentiated classification basis of PCWP and LVEDP in patients planning for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: 284 patients with severe AS completed a combined left (LHC) and right heart catheterization (RHC) as part of a TAVI planning procedure. Patients were categorized twice into subtypes of PH according to 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines—on the one hand with PCWP and on the other hand with LVEDP as classification basis. PCWP-LVEDP relationships were figured out using Kaplan-Meier curves, linear regressions and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: Regarding 1-year mortality, Kaplan-Meier analyses showed similar curves in spite of different classification bases of PH subtypes according to PCWP or LVEDP with exception of pre-capillary PH subtype. PCWP-LVEDP association in the overall cohort was barely present (R = 0.210, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.044). When focusing analysis on PH patients only a slightly increased linear regression was noted compared to the overall cohort (R = 0.220, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.048). The strongest regression was observed in patients with creatinine ≥ 132 µmol/L (R = 0.357, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.127) and in patients with mitral regurgitation ≥ II° (R = 0.326, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.106). Conclusions: In patients with severe AS, there is a weak association between hemodynamic parameters measured by LHC and RHC. RHC measurements alone are not suitable for risk stratification with respect to one-year mortality. If analysis of hemodynamic parameters is necessary in patients with severe AS scheduled for TAVI, measurement results of LHC and RHC should be combined and LVEDP could serve as a helpful indicator for risk assessment.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:13:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6590ef0683d441da8049287f6500c98
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:13:26Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-b6590ef0683d441da8049287f6500c982023-11-23T14:14:42ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-05-011111297810.3390/jcm11112978Comparison of PCWP and LVEDP Measurements in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI—Same Same but Different?Elke Boxhammer0Moritz Mirna1Laura Bäz2Brunilda Alushi3Marcus Franz4Daniel Kretzschmar5Uta C. Hoppe6Alexander Lauten7Michael Lichtenauer8Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Thüringen, Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Department of Cardiology, Friedrich Schiller University, 07743 Jena, GermanyDepartment of General and Interventional Cardiology and Rhythmology, Helios Hospital Erfurt, 99089 Erfurt, GermanyUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Thüringen, Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Department of Cardiology, Friedrich Schiller University, 07743 Jena, GermanyUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Thüringen, Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Department of Cardiology, Friedrich Schiller University, 07743 Jena, GermanyDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of General and Interventional Cardiology and Rhythmology, Helios Hospital Erfurt, 99089 Erfurt, GermanyDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaBackground: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) are often used as equivalents for determination of pulmonary hypertension (PH). PH is a comorbidity in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) and associated with limited prognosis. The aim of the study was to examine the role of differentiated classification basis of PCWP and LVEDP in patients planning for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: 284 patients with severe AS completed a combined left (LHC) and right heart catheterization (RHC) as part of a TAVI planning procedure. Patients were categorized twice into subtypes of PH according to 2015 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines—on the one hand with PCWP and on the other hand with LVEDP as classification basis. PCWP-LVEDP relationships were figured out using Kaplan-Meier curves, linear regressions and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: Regarding 1-year mortality, Kaplan-Meier analyses showed similar curves in spite of different classification bases of PH subtypes according to PCWP or LVEDP with exception of pre-capillary PH subtype. PCWP-LVEDP association in the overall cohort was barely present (R = 0.210, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.044). When focusing analysis on PH patients only a slightly increased linear regression was noted compared to the overall cohort (R = 0.220, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.048). The strongest regression was observed in patients with creatinine ≥ 132 µmol/L (R = 0.357, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.127) and in patients with mitral regurgitation ≥ II° (R = 0.326, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.106). Conclusions: In patients with severe AS, there is a weak association between hemodynamic parameters measured by LHC and RHC. RHC measurements alone are not suitable for risk stratification with respect to one-year mortality. If analysis of hemodynamic parameters is necessary in patients with severe AS scheduled for TAVI, measurement results of LHC and RHC should be combined and LVEDP could serve as a helpful indicator for risk assessment.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/11/2978aortic valve stenosisleft ventricular end-diastolic pressurepulmonary capillary wedge pressureright heart catheterTAVI
spellingShingle Elke Boxhammer
Moritz Mirna
Laura Bäz
Brunilda Alushi
Marcus Franz
Daniel Kretzschmar
Uta C. Hoppe
Alexander Lauten
Michael Lichtenauer
Comparison of PCWP and LVEDP Measurements in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI—Same Same but Different?
Journal of Clinical Medicine
aortic valve stenosis
left ventricular end-diastolic pressure
pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
right heart catheter
TAVI
title Comparison of PCWP and LVEDP Measurements in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI—Same Same but Different?
title_full Comparison of PCWP and LVEDP Measurements in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI—Same Same but Different?
title_fullStr Comparison of PCWP and LVEDP Measurements in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI—Same Same but Different?
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of PCWP and LVEDP Measurements in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI—Same Same but Different?
title_short Comparison of PCWP and LVEDP Measurements in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI—Same Same but Different?
title_sort comparison of pcwp and lvedp measurements in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing tavi same same but different
topic aortic valve stenosis
left ventricular end-diastolic pressure
pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
right heart catheter
TAVI
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/11/2978
work_keys_str_mv AT elkeboxhammer comparisonofpcwpandlvedpmeasurementsinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosisundergoingtavisamesamebutdifferent
AT moritzmirna comparisonofpcwpandlvedpmeasurementsinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosisundergoingtavisamesamebutdifferent
AT laurabaz comparisonofpcwpandlvedpmeasurementsinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosisundergoingtavisamesamebutdifferent
AT brunildaalushi comparisonofpcwpandlvedpmeasurementsinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosisundergoingtavisamesamebutdifferent
AT marcusfranz comparisonofpcwpandlvedpmeasurementsinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosisundergoingtavisamesamebutdifferent
AT danielkretzschmar comparisonofpcwpandlvedpmeasurementsinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosisundergoingtavisamesamebutdifferent
AT utachoppe comparisonofpcwpandlvedpmeasurementsinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosisundergoingtavisamesamebutdifferent
AT alexanderlauten comparisonofpcwpandlvedpmeasurementsinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosisundergoingtavisamesamebutdifferent
AT michaellichtenauer comparisonofpcwpandlvedpmeasurementsinpatientswithsevereaorticstenosisundergoingtavisamesamebutdifferent