Poem as Endangered Being: Lacostian Soundings in Hopkins’s “Hurrahing” and Stevens’s “Blackbird”

This essay situates the recent phenomenology of French Heideggerean-priest Jean-Yves Lacoste in Être en Danger (2011) in a wider discussion of the sacramentology of “things” to pursue the hypothesis that the being of a poem is endangered—crossed between the concrete and the abstract, the perceived a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matthew David Farley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-12-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/12/146
_version_ 1818701311544131584
author Matthew David Farley
author_facet Matthew David Farley
author_sort Matthew David Farley
collection DOAJ
description This essay situates the recent phenomenology of French Heideggerean-priest Jean-Yves Lacoste in Être en Danger (2011) in a wider discussion of the sacramentology of “things” to pursue the hypothesis that the being of a poem is endangered—crossed between the concrete and the abstract, the perceived and the imagined, the object and the thing. Whereas for Heidegger danger entails a technocratic closure of Dasein’s being-toward-death, for Lacoste danger is proper to the being of life. Lacoste offers two “counter-existentials” to show, contra Heidegger, that life simply cannot be being-toward-death all the time: sabbatical experience and art experience. It is to these kinds of experience that poetry clearly belongs. To illustrate what Lacoste means by sabbatical experience, I offer a reading of G.M. Hopkins’s “Hurrahing in Harvest” (1877); to illustrate what Lacoste means by art experience, I turn to Wallace Stevens’s “Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird” (1917). Finally, I conclude that rather than contrast the secular poem with the religious poem it is best to think of all poetry as generically sacramental, i.e., signs and things (signum et res), with religious poetry constituting an excessive pole that is addressed to the sacrament of God (res tantum). The Christian loves the poem because the poem does not make him or her choose between God and things—in light of the Incarnation, an insupportable choice.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T15:18:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b65e34cb0430452f948404c0a3407f29
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T15:18:50Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-b65e34cb0430452f948404c0a3407f292022-12-21T21:43:27ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442016-12-0171214610.3390/rel7120146rel7120146Poem as Endangered Being: Lacostian Soundings in Hopkins’s “Hurrahing” and Stevens’s “Blackbird”Matthew David Farley0Department of Religious Studies, University of Virginia, 323 Gibson Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USAThis essay situates the recent phenomenology of French Heideggerean-priest Jean-Yves Lacoste in Être en Danger (2011) in a wider discussion of the sacramentology of “things” to pursue the hypothesis that the being of a poem is endangered—crossed between the concrete and the abstract, the perceived and the imagined, the object and the thing. Whereas for Heidegger danger entails a technocratic closure of Dasein’s being-toward-death, for Lacoste danger is proper to the being of life. Lacoste offers two “counter-existentials” to show, contra Heidegger, that life simply cannot be being-toward-death all the time: sabbatical experience and art experience. It is to these kinds of experience that poetry clearly belongs. To illustrate what Lacoste means by sabbatical experience, I offer a reading of G.M. Hopkins’s “Hurrahing in Harvest” (1877); to illustrate what Lacoste means by art experience, I turn to Wallace Stevens’s “Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird” (1917). Finally, I conclude that rather than contrast the secular poem with the religious poem it is best to think of all poetry as generically sacramental, i.e., signs and things (signum et res), with religious poetry constituting an excessive pole that is addressed to the sacrament of God (res tantum). The Christian loves the poem because the poem does not make him or her choose between God and things—in light of the Incarnation, an insupportable choice.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/12/146phenomenologyJean-Yves-LacosteMartin HeideggersacramentspoetryWallace StevensGerard Manley Hopkins
spellingShingle Matthew David Farley
Poem as Endangered Being: Lacostian Soundings in Hopkins’s “Hurrahing” and Stevens’s “Blackbird”
Religions
phenomenology
Jean-Yves-Lacoste
Martin Heidegger
sacraments
poetry
Wallace Stevens
Gerard Manley Hopkins
title Poem as Endangered Being: Lacostian Soundings in Hopkins’s “Hurrahing” and Stevens’s “Blackbird”
title_full Poem as Endangered Being: Lacostian Soundings in Hopkins’s “Hurrahing” and Stevens’s “Blackbird”
title_fullStr Poem as Endangered Being: Lacostian Soundings in Hopkins’s “Hurrahing” and Stevens’s “Blackbird”
title_full_unstemmed Poem as Endangered Being: Lacostian Soundings in Hopkins’s “Hurrahing” and Stevens’s “Blackbird”
title_short Poem as Endangered Being: Lacostian Soundings in Hopkins’s “Hurrahing” and Stevens’s “Blackbird”
title_sort poem as endangered being lacostian soundings in hopkins s hurrahing and stevens s blackbird
topic phenomenology
Jean-Yves-Lacoste
Martin Heidegger
sacraments
poetry
Wallace Stevens
Gerard Manley Hopkins
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/7/12/146
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewdavidfarley poemasendangeredbeinglacostiansoundingsinhopkinsshurrahingandstevenssblackbird