Freedom and Environmental Performance: Evidence from MENAT Countries

Environment quality and its determinants are one of the main challenges of the present and future of humanity and sustainable development is interpreted in the direction of preserving and improving the environment. In recent years, many studies have been conducted on the factors affecting environmen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S.E. Alavi, M. Mohammadi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad 2023-08-01
Series:مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jead.um.ac.ir/article_44085_e2c43c654071596d135aee56d4d0fdbb.pdf
_version_ 1827771038910382080
author S.E. Alavi
M. Mohammadi
author_facet S.E. Alavi
M. Mohammadi
author_sort S.E. Alavi
collection DOAJ
description Environment quality and its determinants are one of the main challenges of the present and future of humanity and sustainable development is interpreted in the direction of preserving and improving the environment. In recent years, many studies have been conducted on the factors affecting environmental quality. One of the main topics that have been less considered in the related studies is the impact of governance on the quality of the environment. In this study, the impact of good governance components, including economic freedom, trade freedom, and political freedom, on the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and its sub-indices including environmental health, ecosystem vitality, and climate change is investigated. The data required for statistical analysis are related to Middle East and North Africa region countries and Turkiye (MENAT) during 2000-2021. The panel data method was used to estimate the model and examine the relationship between the variables. The findings show that there is a positive and significant relationship between economic freedom and political freedom with the environmental performance index (EPI), and there is no significant relationship between trade freedom and EPI. In addition, the study found that economic freedom had a detrimental effect on ecosystem vitality and climate change, leading to negative impacts in these areas. However, it had a positive impact on environmental health, indicating that it contributed positively to this aspect. On the other hand, political freedom was observed to have a positive effect on the vitality of the ecosystem and climate change. However, it did not have a significant impact on the overall health of the environment, suggesting that its influence was more prominent in specific areas related to ecosystem vitality and climate change. The result of this research showed that economic freedom has led to more investment in the oil and gas sector of MENA countries, and therefore wastewater and gas emissions have had a negative impact on the vitality of the environment and climate change, but with the increase in production and sales of oil and Gas, per capita income of countries has increased, and environmental health has improved. Also, considering that political freedom among the MENA region has a lot of diversity, the results showed that the countries with more political freedom, through greater awareness of the society and more accountability of the governments and the establishment of environmental protection laws, had a positive impact on the environment. Of course, the environmental health index is more influenced by the economic situation and per capita production of countries and political freedom has little effect on it.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:48:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b66cc8aacf71413b8d8d0dc00445a1c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-4722
2423-3951
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:48:01Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
record_format Article
series مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی
spelling doaj.art-b66cc8aacf71413b8d8d0dc00445a1c82023-11-04T06:50:21ZfasFerdowsi University of Mashhadمجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی2008-47222423-39512023-08-0137215717610.22067/jead.2023.81572.118444085Freedom and Environmental Performance: Evidence from MENAT CountriesS.E. Alavi0M. Mohammadi1Department of Economics, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, IranDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, IranEnvironment quality and its determinants are one of the main challenges of the present and future of humanity and sustainable development is interpreted in the direction of preserving and improving the environment. In recent years, many studies have been conducted on the factors affecting environmental quality. One of the main topics that have been less considered in the related studies is the impact of governance on the quality of the environment. In this study, the impact of good governance components, including economic freedom, trade freedom, and political freedom, on the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) and its sub-indices including environmental health, ecosystem vitality, and climate change is investigated. The data required for statistical analysis are related to Middle East and North Africa region countries and Turkiye (MENAT) during 2000-2021. The panel data method was used to estimate the model and examine the relationship between the variables. The findings show that there is a positive and significant relationship between economic freedom and political freedom with the environmental performance index (EPI), and there is no significant relationship between trade freedom and EPI. In addition, the study found that economic freedom had a detrimental effect on ecosystem vitality and climate change, leading to negative impacts in these areas. However, it had a positive impact on environmental health, indicating that it contributed positively to this aspect. On the other hand, political freedom was observed to have a positive effect on the vitality of the ecosystem and climate change. However, it did not have a significant impact on the overall health of the environment, suggesting that its influence was more prominent in specific areas related to ecosystem vitality and climate change. The result of this research showed that economic freedom has led to more investment in the oil and gas sector of MENA countries, and therefore wastewater and gas emissions have had a negative impact on the vitality of the environment and climate change, but with the increase in production and sales of oil and Gas, per capita income of countries has increased, and environmental health has improved. Also, considering that political freedom among the MENA region has a lot of diversity, the results showed that the countries with more political freedom, through greater awareness of the society and more accountability of the governments and the establishment of environmental protection laws, had a positive impact on the environment. Of course, the environmental health index is more influenced by the economic situation and per capita production of countries and political freedom has little effect on it.https://jead.um.ac.ir/article_44085_e2c43c654071596d135aee56d4d0fdbb.pdfenvironmental performanceeconomic freedompolitical freedom
spellingShingle S.E. Alavi
M. Mohammadi
Freedom and Environmental Performance: Evidence from MENAT Countries
مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی
environmental performance
economic freedom
political freedom
title Freedom and Environmental Performance: Evidence from MENAT Countries
title_full Freedom and Environmental Performance: Evidence from MENAT Countries
title_fullStr Freedom and Environmental Performance: Evidence from MENAT Countries
title_full_unstemmed Freedom and Environmental Performance: Evidence from MENAT Countries
title_short Freedom and Environmental Performance: Evidence from MENAT Countries
title_sort freedom and environmental performance evidence from menat countries
topic environmental performance
economic freedom
political freedom
url https://jead.um.ac.ir/article_44085_e2c43c654071596d135aee56d4d0fdbb.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sealavi freedomandenvironmentalperformanceevidencefrommenatcountries
AT mmohammadi freedomandenvironmentalperformanceevidencefrommenatcountries