ROMANTIC HUMAN STUDY: PECULIARITIES OF PERSONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN THE LITERATURE OF THE 1820-1830-IES.

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to show the connection of romanticism with the anthropological doctrine that goes back to Hegelianism and Kantianism, and at the same time – with the concepts of the future, structuralism and postmodernism. Theoretical basis. The man is a central figure of the Ro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. N. Zhuzhgina-Allahverdian, S. A. Ostapenko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan 2020-12-01
Series:Antropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/221425
_version_ 1818244073569386496
author T. N. Zhuzhgina-Allahverdian
S. A. Ostapenko
author_facet T. N. Zhuzhgina-Allahverdian
S. A. Ostapenko
author_sort T. N. Zhuzhgina-Allahverdian
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. The purpose of the study is to show the connection of romanticism with the anthropological doctrine that goes back to Hegelianism and Kantianism, and at the same time – with the concepts of the future, structuralism and postmodernism. Theoretical basis. The man is a central figure of the Romantic literary, therefore it makes sense to single out romantic human anthropological doctrine and the image of man associated with a specific historical and cultural era called the "epoch of romanticism"; to show that many romantic philosophical positions remained relevant to the basic foundations of contemporary anthropological research and coincide with it in analytical and critical thinking about a man, a person, his historical and evolutionary fate. Originality. The romantic worldview determined the specifics of anthropological discourse, both logical and illogical, remaining symbols and attaching, as for example, a real historical anecdote, a popular history, a philosophical thought, a myth, a famous literary episode and the arts multiplied by creative inspiration and imagination. This tendency determined the fragmentation of thinking and the scientific image of man as a dual being, nevertheless, presented and described in all the variety of relations with the world and with himself, that allows us to call this area of thought "the romantic human science". Conclusions. Structural analysis of numerous romantic texts allows us to draw the following conclusion: with mythopoetic imagery and anthropological thought about a man, romantic writers introduced the reader to any wisdom, to philosophical understanding of their human essence, to past and modern teachings, in a way processed antique, medieval and enlightening views, in which an important place was given to reflections on the place of man in nature, society, and history. Correlating the well-known statements about a person as a descendant of the "old Adam", "person", "personality", "soul", with the modern idea of historical and social development, about the evolution of the consciousness of a person who revealed himself as an individual in modern times, with scientific and aesthetic views, the writers of the first half of the XIX century gave romantic thought anthropological meaning and, in fact, laid the foundations of historical, social, psychological, cultural and psychoanalytic anthropology.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T14:11:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b68a4e7acd7340a0a5f193a7af3272c1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7242
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T14:11:13Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan
record_format Article
series Antropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'
spelling doaj.art-b68a4e7acd7340a0a5f193a7af3272c12022-12-22T00:22:05ZengDnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. LazaryanAntropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'2227-72422020-12-011815516710.15802/ampr.v0i18.221425208871ROMANTIC HUMAN STUDY: PECULIARITIES OF PERSONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN THE LITERATURE OF THE 1820-1830-IES.T. N. Zhuzhgina-Allahverdian0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5953-4424S. A. Ostapenko1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3915-4854Horlivka Institute оf Foreign Languages of the State Higher Educational Institution "Donbas State Pedagogical University"Donetsk National University of Economics and Trade named after Mykhailo Tugan-BaranovskyPurpose. The purpose of the study is to show the connection of romanticism with the anthropological doctrine that goes back to Hegelianism and Kantianism, and at the same time – with the concepts of the future, structuralism and postmodernism. Theoretical basis. The man is a central figure of the Romantic literary, therefore it makes sense to single out romantic human anthropological doctrine and the image of man associated with a specific historical and cultural era called the "epoch of romanticism"; to show that many romantic philosophical positions remained relevant to the basic foundations of contemporary anthropological research and coincide with it in analytical and critical thinking about a man, a person, his historical and evolutionary fate. Originality. The romantic worldview determined the specifics of anthropological discourse, both logical and illogical, remaining symbols and attaching, as for example, a real historical anecdote, a popular history, a philosophical thought, a myth, a famous literary episode and the arts multiplied by creative inspiration and imagination. This tendency determined the fragmentation of thinking and the scientific image of man as a dual being, nevertheless, presented and described in all the variety of relations with the world and with himself, that allows us to call this area of thought "the romantic human science". Conclusions. Structural analysis of numerous romantic texts allows us to draw the following conclusion: with mythopoetic imagery and anthropological thought about a man, romantic writers introduced the reader to any wisdom, to philosophical understanding of their human essence, to past and modern teachings, in a way processed antique, medieval and enlightening views, in which an important place was given to reflections on the place of man in nature, society, and history. Correlating the well-known statements about a person as a descendant of the "old Adam", "person", "personality", "soul", with the modern idea of historical and social development, about the evolution of the consciousness of a person who revealed himself as an individual in modern times, with scientific and aesthetic views, the writers of the first half of the XIX century gave romantic thought anthropological meaning and, in fact, laid the foundations of historical, social, psychological, cultural and psychoanalytic anthropology.http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/221425romanticismhuman beinghuman studypersonality philosophyphilosophy of the "alter"personal motivesindividualismauthor’s mythbinaritysimulacrum
spellingShingle T. N. Zhuzhgina-Allahverdian
S. A. Ostapenko
ROMANTIC HUMAN STUDY: PECULIARITIES OF PERSONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN THE LITERATURE OF THE 1820-1830-IES.
Antropologìčnì Vimìri Fìlosofsʹkih Doslìdžen'
romanticism
human being
human study
personality philosophy
philosophy of the "alter"
personal motives
individualism
author’s myth
binarity
simulacrum
title ROMANTIC HUMAN STUDY: PECULIARITIES OF PERSONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN THE LITERATURE OF THE 1820-1830-IES.
title_full ROMANTIC HUMAN STUDY: PECULIARITIES OF PERSONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN THE LITERATURE OF THE 1820-1830-IES.
title_fullStr ROMANTIC HUMAN STUDY: PECULIARITIES OF PERSONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN THE LITERATURE OF THE 1820-1830-IES.
title_full_unstemmed ROMANTIC HUMAN STUDY: PECULIARITIES OF PERSONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN THE LITERATURE OF THE 1820-1830-IES.
title_short ROMANTIC HUMAN STUDY: PECULIARITIES OF PERSONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN THE LITERATURE OF THE 1820-1830-IES.
title_sort romantic human study peculiarities of personality philosophy in the literature of the 1820 1830 ies
topic romanticism
human being
human study
personality philosophy
philosophy of the "alter"
personal motives
individualism
author’s myth
binarity
simulacrum
url http://ampr.diit.edu.ua/article/view/221425
work_keys_str_mv AT tnzhuzhginaallahverdian romantichumanstudypeculiaritiesofpersonalityphilosophyintheliteratureofthe18201830ies
AT saostapenko romantichumanstudypeculiaritiesofpersonalityphilosophyintheliteratureofthe18201830ies