How does the continued use of the mask affect the craniofacial region? A cross‐sectional study

Abstract Objective The aim was to compare the effects between pre‐pandemic mask‐free living versus pandemic‐related continuous mask use. Methods A retrospective study was carried out. This study was conducted with 542 face mask users. Assessments included presence, frequency and impact of headache,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena Marques‐Sule, Gemma Victoria Espí‐López, Lucas Monzani, Luis Suso‐Martí, Miriam Calderón Rel, Anna Arnal‐Gómez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-07-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3077
_version_ 1827902861515685888
author Elena Marques‐Sule
Gemma Victoria Espí‐López
Lucas Monzani
Luis Suso‐Martí
Miriam Calderón Rel
Anna Arnal‐Gómez
author_facet Elena Marques‐Sule
Gemma Victoria Espí‐López
Lucas Monzani
Luis Suso‐Martí
Miriam Calderón Rel
Anna Arnal‐Gómez
author_sort Elena Marques‐Sule
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The aim was to compare the effects between pre‐pandemic mask‐free living versus pandemic‐related continuous mask use. Methods A retrospective study was carried out. This study was conducted with 542 face mask users. Assessments included presence, frequency and impact of headache, temporomandibular disorders, and quality of life (QoL). Results Continuous mask use had a large main effect on headache, temporomandibular pain, and QoL (p < .0001; d = 1.25), but this effect was nuanced by mask type. Participants who declared suffering from headache increased by 84% with cloth masks, and by 25% with FFP2 masks. Temporomandibular pain increased by 50% and by 39% when wearing surgical masks and FFP2, respectively (p < .06; d = .19). The mask type did not nuance the effect on headache impact (p > .05; d = .06). QoL decreased regardless of mask type (p < .05; d = .21), the decrease being 38% for surgical masks, and 31% for either cloth or FFP2 masks. Conclusions Continuous mask use, regardless of type, increased existence of headache, headache impact, temporomandibular pain, and reduced QoL.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:05:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b68dc0a420b7473fb1f4a1d496f16224
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2162-3279
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:05:08Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Brain and Behavior
spelling doaj.art-b68dc0a420b7473fb1f4a1d496f162242023-07-13T04:43:16ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792023-07-01137n/an/a10.1002/brb3.3077How does the continued use of the mask affect the craniofacial region? A cross‐sectional studyElena Marques‐Sule0Gemma Victoria Espí‐López1Lucas Monzani2Luis Suso‐Martí3Miriam Calderón Rel4Anna Arnal‐Gómez5Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy University of Valencia Valencia SpainDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy University of Valencia Valencia SpainIvey Business School at Western University London Ontario CanadaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy University of Valencia Valencia SpainDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy University of Valencia Valencia SpainDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physiotherapy University of Valencia Valencia SpainAbstract Objective The aim was to compare the effects between pre‐pandemic mask‐free living versus pandemic‐related continuous mask use. Methods A retrospective study was carried out. This study was conducted with 542 face mask users. Assessments included presence, frequency and impact of headache, temporomandibular disorders, and quality of life (QoL). Results Continuous mask use had a large main effect on headache, temporomandibular pain, and QoL (p < .0001; d = 1.25), but this effect was nuanced by mask type. Participants who declared suffering from headache increased by 84% with cloth masks, and by 25% with FFP2 masks. Temporomandibular pain increased by 50% and by 39% when wearing surgical masks and FFP2, respectively (p < .06; d = .19). The mask type did not nuance the effect on headache impact (p > .05; d = .06). QoL decreased regardless of mask type (p < .05; d = .21), the decrease being 38% for surgical masks, and 31% for either cloth or FFP2 masks. Conclusions Continuous mask use, regardless of type, increased existence of headache, headache impact, temporomandibular pain, and reduced QoL.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3077face maskheadacheimpactpandemicprotectionquality of life
spellingShingle Elena Marques‐Sule
Gemma Victoria Espí‐López
Lucas Monzani
Luis Suso‐Martí
Miriam Calderón Rel
Anna Arnal‐Gómez
How does the continued use of the mask affect the craniofacial region? A cross‐sectional study
Brain and Behavior
face mask
headache
impact
pandemic
protection
quality of life
title How does the continued use of the mask affect the craniofacial region? A cross‐sectional study
title_full How does the continued use of the mask affect the craniofacial region? A cross‐sectional study
title_fullStr How does the continued use of the mask affect the craniofacial region? A cross‐sectional study
title_full_unstemmed How does the continued use of the mask affect the craniofacial region? A cross‐sectional study
title_short How does the continued use of the mask affect the craniofacial region? A cross‐sectional study
title_sort how does the continued use of the mask affect the craniofacial region a cross sectional study
topic face mask
headache
impact
pandemic
protection
quality of life
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3077
work_keys_str_mv AT elenamarquessule howdoesthecontinueduseofthemaskaffectthecraniofacialregionacrosssectionalstudy
AT gemmavictoriaespilopez howdoesthecontinueduseofthemaskaffectthecraniofacialregionacrosssectionalstudy
AT lucasmonzani howdoesthecontinueduseofthemaskaffectthecraniofacialregionacrosssectionalstudy
AT luissusomarti howdoesthecontinueduseofthemaskaffectthecraniofacialregionacrosssectionalstudy
AT miriamcalderonrel howdoesthecontinueduseofthemaskaffectthecraniofacialregionacrosssectionalstudy
AT annaarnalgomez howdoesthecontinueduseofthemaskaffectthecraniofacialregionacrosssectionalstudy