Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment

ABSTRACT: Background: The incidence of correctional surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has increased significantly over the past 2 decades. Pelvic incidence, an angular measurement, is the gold standard pelvic parameter and is used to classify spinal shapes into Roussouly types. Current liter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Justice U. Achonu, MD, Kenny Ling, BS, Rohit Bhan, MS, Alexander Garcia, BS, David E. Komatsu, PhD, Nicholas A. Pallotta, MD, MS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:North American Spine Society Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548423000768
_version_ 1797390368889634816
author Justice U. Achonu, MD
Kenny Ling, BS
Rohit Bhan, MS
Alexander Garcia, BS
David E. Komatsu, PhD
Nicholas A. Pallotta, MD, MS
author_facet Justice U. Achonu, MD
Kenny Ling, BS
Rohit Bhan, MS
Alexander Garcia, BS
David E. Komatsu, PhD
Nicholas A. Pallotta, MD, MS
author_sort Justice U. Achonu, MD
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: Background: The incidence of correctional surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has increased significantly over the past 2 decades. Pelvic incidence, an angular measurement, is the gold standard pelvic parameter and is used to classify spinal shapes into Roussouly types. Current literature states that restoration of the spine to its original Roussouly classification optimizes outcomes. We propose a new pelvic parameter, pelvic index, as a length measurement to complement pelvic incidence in more accurately characterizing Roussouly types. Methods: This study is a retrospective evaluation of sagittal spinal radiographs of 208 patients who were assessed by a single fellowship trained orthopedic spine surgeon between January and December 2020. Measurements included pelvic incidence, sacroacetabular distance, and L5 vertebral height. Pelvic index was calculated as the ratio of sacroacetabular distance to L5 height. Each spine was also classified into one of the Roussouly types: 1, 2, 3 anteverted pelvis (AP), 3, or 4. The 2 pelvic parameters were compared between groups to assess their ability to differentiate between Roussouly types. Results: Of the 208 patients included, 103 (49.5%) were female and 105 (50.5%) were male. The mean pelvic incidence was 54.9 ± 12.3° and the mean pelvic index was 3.99 ± 0.38. The difference in mean pelvic index was statistically significant between types 1 and 2 (0.15; p=.046) and between types 1 and 3 AP (0.19; p=.029). It was not statistically significant between types 3 and 4 (0.05; p=.251). However, in terms of pelvic incidence, the mean difference was statistically significant only between types 3 and 4 (10.4; p<.001). Conclusions: Pelvic index is the ratio of the sacroacetabular distance to the height of the L5 vertebra. In conjunction with pelvic incidence, pelvic index can help to distinguish between Roussouly types 1 and 2 and between types 1 and 3 AP, the low-pelvic incidence types.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:10:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6bcf2dd41384562bb7c2c315fbddf53
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5484
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T23:10:43Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series North American Spine Society Journal
spelling doaj.art-b6bcf2dd41384562bb7c2c315fbddf532023-12-15T07:26:28ZengElsevierNorth American Spine Society Journal2666-54842023-12-0116100274Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignmentJustice U. Achonu, MD0Kenny Ling, BS1Rohit Bhan, MS2Alexander Garcia, BS3David E. Komatsu, PhD4Nicholas A. Pallotta, MD, MS5Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, HSC-T18, Room 085, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181, United States; Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, HSC T-18 – 089, NY 11794, USA. Tel.: (631) 444-7222.Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, HSC-T18, Room 085, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181, United StatesDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, HSC-T18, Room 085, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181, United StatesDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, HSC-T18, Room 085, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181, United StatesDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Stony Brook University, HSC-T18, Room 085, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8181, United StatesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8233660, South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110, United StatesABSTRACT: Background: The incidence of correctional surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has increased significantly over the past 2 decades. Pelvic incidence, an angular measurement, is the gold standard pelvic parameter and is used to classify spinal shapes into Roussouly types. Current literature states that restoration of the spine to its original Roussouly classification optimizes outcomes. We propose a new pelvic parameter, pelvic index, as a length measurement to complement pelvic incidence in more accurately characterizing Roussouly types. Methods: This study is a retrospective evaluation of sagittal spinal radiographs of 208 patients who were assessed by a single fellowship trained orthopedic spine surgeon between January and December 2020. Measurements included pelvic incidence, sacroacetabular distance, and L5 vertebral height. Pelvic index was calculated as the ratio of sacroacetabular distance to L5 height. Each spine was also classified into one of the Roussouly types: 1, 2, 3 anteverted pelvis (AP), 3, or 4. The 2 pelvic parameters were compared between groups to assess their ability to differentiate between Roussouly types. Results: Of the 208 patients included, 103 (49.5%) were female and 105 (50.5%) were male. The mean pelvic incidence was 54.9 ± 12.3° and the mean pelvic index was 3.99 ± 0.38. The difference in mean pelvic index was statistically significant between types 1 and 2 (0.15; p=.046) and between types 1 and 3 AP (0.19; p=.029). It was not statistically significant between types 3 and 4 (0.05; p=.251). However, in terms of pelvic incidence, the mean difference was statistically significant only between types 3 and 4 (10.4; p<.001). Conclusions: Pelvic index is the ratio of the sacroacetabular distance to the height of the L5 vertebra. In conjunction with pelvic incidence, pelvic index can help to distinguish between Roussouly types 1 and 2 and between types 1 and 3 AP, the low-pelvic incidence types.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548423000768Pelvic incidenceAdult spinal deformityRoussoulyPelvic parameterPelvic indexScoliosis
spellingShingle Justice U. Achonu, MD
Kenny Ling, BS
Rohit Bhan, MS
Alexander Garcia, BS
David E. Komatsu, PhD
Nicholas A. Pallotta, MD, MS
Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment
North American Spine Society Journal
Pelvic incidence
Adult spinal deformity
Roussouly
Pelvic parameter
Pelvic index
Scoliosis
title Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment
title_full Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment
title_fullStr Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment
title_short Pelvic index: A new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment
title_sort pelvic index a new pelvic parameter for assessing sagittal spinal alignment
topic Pelvic incidence
Adult spinal deformity
Roussouly
Pelvic parameter
Pelvic index
Scoliosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548423000768
work_keys_str_mv AT justiceuachonumd pelvicindexanewpelvicparameterforassessingsagittalspinalalignment
AT kennylingbs pelvicindexanewpelvicparameterforassessingsagittalspinalalignment
AT rohitbhanms pelvicindexanewpelvicparameterforassessingsagittalspinalalignment
AT alexandergarciabs pelvicindexanewpelvicparameterforassessingsagittalspinalalignment
AT davidekomatsuphd pelvicindexanewpelvicparameterforassessingsagittalspinalalignment
AT nicholasapallottamdms pelvicindexanewpelvicparameterforassessingsagittalspinalalignment