Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition

IntroductionThe decomposition of plant litter mass is responsible for substantial carbon fluxes and remains a key process regulating nutrient cycling in natural and managed ecosystems. Litter decomposition has been addressed in agricultural monoculture systems, but not in intercropping systems, whic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Surigaoge Surigaoge, Hao Yang, Ye Su, Yu-He Du, Su-Xian Ren, Dario Fornara, Peter Christie, Wei-Ping Zhang, Long Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Plant Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1100842/full
_version_ 1811160766916591616
author Surigaoge Surigaoge
Hao Yang
Ye Su
Yu-He Du
Su-Xian Ren
Dario Fornara
Peter Christie
Wei-Ping Zhang
Long Li
author_facet Surigaoge Surigaoge
Hao Yang
Ye Su
Yu-He Du
Su-Xian Ren
Dario Fornara
Peter Christie
Wei-Ping Zhang
Long Li
author_sort Surigaoge Surigaoge
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionThe decomposition of plant litter mass is responsible for substantial carbon fluxes and remains a key process regulating nutrient cycling in natural and managed ecosystems. Litter decomposition has been addressed in agricultural monoculture systems, but not in intercropping systems, which produce species-diverse litter mass mixtures. The aim here is to quantify how straw type, the soil environment and their combined effects may influence straw decomposition in widely practiced maize/legume intercropping systems.MethodsThree decomposition experiments were conducted over 341 days within a long-term intercropping field experiment which included two nitrogen (N) addition levels (i.e. no-N and N-addition) and five cropping systems (maize, soybean and peanut monocultures and maize/soybean and maize/peanut intercropping). Experiment I was used to quantify litter quality effects on decomposition; five types of straw (maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean and maize-peanut) from two N treatments decomposed in the same maize plot. Experiment II addressed soil environment effects on root decomposition; soybean straw decomposed in different plots (five cropping systems and two N levels). Experiment III addressed ‘home’ decomposition effects whereby litter mass (straw) was remained to decompose in the plot of origin. The contribution of litter and soil effects to the home-field advantages was compared between experiment III (‘home’ plot) and I-II (‘away’ plot).Results and discussionsStraw type affected litter mass loss in the same soil environment (experiment I) and the mass loss values of maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean, and maize-peanut straw were 59, 77, 87, 76, and 78%, respectively. Straw type also affected decomposition in the ‘home’ plot environment (experiment III), with mass loss values of maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean and maize-peanut straw of 66, 74, 80, 72, and 76%, respectively. Cropping system did not affect the mass loss of soybean straw (experiment II). Nitrogen-addition significantly increased straw mass loss in experiment III. Decomposition of maize-peanut straw mixtures was enhanced more by ‘home-field advantage’ effects than that of maize-soybean straw mixtures. There was a synergistic mixing effect of maize-peanut and maize-soybean straw mixture decomposition in both 'home' (experiment III) and ‘away’ plots (experiment I). Maize-peanut showed greater synergistic effects than maize-soybean in straw mixture decomposition in their 'home' plot (experiment III). These findings are discussed in terms of their important implications for the management of species-diverse straw in food-production intercropping systems.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T06:03:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6bd795060a5401fa2ad3f0d8f095a55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-462X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T06:03:04Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Plant Science
spelling doaj.art-b6bd795060a5401fa2ad3f0d8f095a552023-03-03T06:20:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2023-03-011410.3389/fpls.2023.11008421100842Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decompositionSurigaoge Surigaoge0Hao Yang1Ye Su2Yu-He Du3Su-Xian Ren4Dario Fornara5Peter Christie6Wei-Ping Zhang7Long Li8Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaDavines Group-Rodale Institute European Regenerative Organic Center (EROC), Parma, ItalyChinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaIntroductionThe decomposition of plant litter mass is responsible for substantial carbon fluxes and remains a key process regulating nutrient cycling in natural and managed ecosystems. Litter decomposition has been addressed in agricultural monoculture systems, but not in intercropping systems, which produce species-diverse litter mass mixtures. The aim here is to quantify how straw type, the soil environment and their combined effects may influence straw decomposition in widely practiced maize/legume intercropping systems.MethodsThree decomposition experiments were conducted over 341 days within a long-term intercropping field experiment which included two nitrogen (N) addition levels (i.e. no-N and N-addition) and five cropping systems (maize, soybean and peanut monocultures and maize/soybean and maize/peanut intercropping). Experiment I was used to quantify litter quality effects on decomposition; five types of straw (maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean and maize-peanut) from two N treatments decomposed in the same maize plot. Experiment II addressed soil environment effects on root decomposition; soybean straw decomposed in different plots (five cropping systems and two N levels). Experiment III addressed ‘home’ decomposition effects whereby litter mass (straw) was remained to decompose in the plot of origin. The contribution of litter and soil effects to the home-field advantages was compared between experiment III (‘home’ plot) and I-II (‘away’ plot).Results and discussionsStraw type affected litter mass loss in the same soil environment (experiment I) and the mass loss values of maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean, and maize-peanut straw were 59, 77, 87, 76, and 78%, respectively. Straw type also affected decomposition in the ‘home’ plot environment (experiment III), with mass loss values of maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean and maize-peanut straw of 66, 74, 80, 72, and 76%, respectively. Cropping system did not affect the mass loss of soybean straw (experiment II). Nitrogen-addition significantly increased straw mass loss in experiment III. Decomposition of maize-peanut straw mixtures was enhanced more by ‘home-field advantage’ effects than that of maize-soybean straw mixtures. There was a synergistic mixing effect of maize-peanut and maize-soybean straw mixture decomposition in both 'home' (experiment III) and ‘away’ plots (experiment I). Maize-peanut showed greater synergistic effects than maize-soybean in straw mixture decomposition in their 'home' plot (experiment III). These findings are discussed in terms of their important implications for the management of species-diverse straw in food-production intercropping systems.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1100842/fullC:N ratiohome-field advantagelitter qualitymaize/legume intercroppingmixed litter decompositionN addition
spellingShingle Surigaoge Surigaoge
Hao Yang
Ye Su
Yu-He Du
Su-Xian Ren
Dario Fornara
Peter Christie
Wei-Ping Zhang
Long Li
Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition
Frontiers in Plant Science
C:N ratio
home-field advantage
litter quality
maize/legume intercropping
mixed litter decomposition
N addition
title Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition
title_full Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition
title_fullStr Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition
title_full_unstemmed Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition
title_short Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition
title_sort maize peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home field advantages than maize soybean on straw decomposition
topic C:N ratio
home-field advantage
litter quality
maize/legume intercropping
mixed litter decomposition
N addition
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1100842/full
work_keys_str_mv AT surigaogesurigaoge maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition
AT haoyang maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition
AT yesu maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition
AT yuhedu maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition
AT suxianren maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition
AT dariofornara maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition
AT peterchristie maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition
AT weipingzhang maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition
AT longli maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition