Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition
IntroductionThe decomposition of plant litter mass is responsible for substantial carbon fluxes and remains a key process regulating nutrient cycling in natural and managed ecosystems. Litter decomposition has been addressed in agricultural monoculture systems, but not in intercropping systems, whic...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Plant Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1100842/full |
_version_ | 1811160766916591616 |
---|---|
author | Surigaoge Surigaoge Hao Yang Ye Su Yu-He Du Su-Xian Ren Dario Fornara Peter Christie Wei-Ping Zhang Long Li |
author_facet | Surigaoge Surigaoge Hao Yang Ye Su Yu-He Du Su-Xian Ren Dario Fornara Peter Christie Wei-Ping Zhang Long Li |
author_sort | Surigaoge Surigaoge |
collection | DOAJ |
description | IntroductionThe decomposition of plant litter mass is responsible for substantial carbon fluxes and remains a key process regulating nutrient cycling in natural and managed ecosystems. Litter decomposition has been addressed in agricultural monoculture systems, but not in intercropping systems, which produce species-diverse litter mass mixtures. The aim here is to quantify how straw type, the soil environment and their combined effects may influence straw decomposition in widely practiced maize/legume intercropping systems.MethodsThree decomposition experiments were conducted over 341 days within a long-term intercropping field experiment which included two nitrogen (N) addition levels (i.e. no-N and N-addition) and five cropping systems (maize, soybean and peanut monocultures and maize/soybean and maize/peanut intercropping). Experiment I was used to quantify litter quality effects on decomposition; five types of straw (maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean and maize-peanut) from two N treatments decomposed in the same maize plot. Experiment II addressed soil environment effects on root decomposition; soybean straw decomposed in different plots (five cropping systems and two N levels). Experiment III addressed ‘home’ decomposition effects whereby litter mass (straw) was remained to decompose in the plot of origin. The contribution of litter and soil effects to the home-field advantages was compared between experiment III (‘home’ plot) and I-II (‘away’ plot).Results and discussionsStraw type affected litter mass loss in the same soil environment (experiment I) and the mass loss values of maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean, and maize-peanut straw were 59, 77, 87, 76, and 78%, respectively. Straw type also affected decomposition in the ‘home’ plot environment (experiment III), with mass loss values of maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean and maize-peanut straw of 66, 74, 80, 72, and 76%, respectively. Cropping system did not affect the mass loss of soybean straw (experiment II). Nitrogen-addition significantly increased straw mass loss in experiment III. Decomposition of maize-peanut straw mixtures was enhanced more by ‘home-field advantage’ effects than that of maize-soybean straw mixtures. There was a synergistic mixing effect of maize-peanut and maize-soybean straw mixture decomposition in both 'home' (experiment III) and ‘away’ plots (experiment I). Maize-peanut showed greater synergistic effects than maize-soybean in straw mixture decomposition in their 'home' plot (experiment III). These findings are discussed in terms of their important implications for the management of species-diverse straw in food-production intercropping systems. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T06:03:04Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b6bd795060a5401fa2ad3f0d8f095a55 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-462X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T06:03:04Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Plant Science |
spelling | doaj.art-b6bd795060a5401fa2ad3f0d8f095a552023-03-03T06:20:14ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Plant Science1664-462X2023-03-011410.3389/fpls.2023.11008421100842Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decompositionSurigaoge Surigaoge0Hao Yang1Ye Su2Yu-He Du3Su-Xian Ren4Dario Fornara5Peter Christie6Wei-Ping Zhang7Long Li8Beijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaDavines Group-Rodale Institute European Regenerative Organic Center (EROC), Parma, ItalyChinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaBeijing Key Laboratory of Biodiversity and Organic Farming, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, ChinaIntroductionThe decomposition of plant litter mass is responsible for substantial carbon fluxes and remains a key process regulating nutrient cycling in natural and managed ecosystems. Litter decomposition has been addressed in agricultural monoculture systems, but not in intercropping systems, which produce species-diverse litter mass mixtures. The aim here is to quantify how straw type, the soil environment and their combined effects may influence straw decomposition in widely practiced maize/legume intercropping systems.MethodsThree decomposition experiments were conducted over 341 days within a long-term intercropping field experiment which included two nitrogen (N) addition levels (i.e. no-N and N-addition) and five cropping systems (maize, soybean and peanut monocultures and maize/soybean and maize/peanut intercropping). Experiment I was used to quantify litter quality effects on decomposition; five types of straw (maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean and maize-peanut) from two N treatments decomposed in the same maize plot. Experiment II addressed soil environment effects on root decomposition; soybean straw decomposed in different plots (five cropping systems and two N levels). Experiment III addressed ‘home’ decomposition effects whereby litter mass (straw) was remained to decompose in the plot of origin. The contribution of litter and soil effects to the home-field advantages was compared between experiment III (‘home’ plot) and I-II (‘away’ plot).Results and discussionsStraw type affected litter mass loss in the same soil environment (experiment I) and the mass loss values of maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean, and maize-peanut straw were 59, 77, 87, 76, and 78%, respectively. Straw type also affected decomposition in the ‘home’ plot environment (experiment III), with mass loss values of maize, soybean, peanut, maize-soybean and maize-peanut straw of 66, 74, 80, 72, and 76%, respectively. Cropping system did not affect the mass loss of soybean straw (experiment II). Nitrogen-addition significantly increased straw mass loss in experiment III. Decomposition of maize-peanut straw mixtures was enhanced more by ‘home-field advantage’ effects than that of maize-soybean straw mixtures. There was a synergistic mixing effect of maize-peanut and maize-soybean straw mixture decomposition in both 'home' (experiment III) and ‘away’ plots (experiment I). Maize-peanut showed greater synergistic effects than maize-soybean in straw mixture decomposition in their 'home' plot (experiment III). These findings are discussed in terms of their important implications for the management of species-diverse straw in food-production intercropping systems.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1100842/fullC:N ratiohome-field advantagelitter qualitymaize/legume intercroppingmixed litter decompositionN addition |
spellingShingle | Surigaoge Surigaoge Hao Yang Ye Su Yu-He Du Su-Xian Ren Dario Fornara Peter Christie Wei-Ping Zhang Long Li Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition Frontiers in Plant Science C:N ratio home-field advantage litter quality maize/legume intercropping mixed litter decomposition N addition |
title | Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition |
title_full | Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition |
title_fullStr | Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition |
title_full_unstemmed | Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition |
title_short | Maize/peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home-field advantages than maize/soybean on straw decomposition |
title_sort | maize peanut intercropping has greater synergistic effects and home field advantages than maize soybean on straw decomposition |
topic | C:N ratio home-field advantage litter quality maize/legume intercropping mixed litter decomposition N addition |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1100842/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT surigaogesurigaoge maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition AT haoyang maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition AT yesu maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition AT yuhedu maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition AT suxianren maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition AT dariofornara maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition AT peterchristie maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition AT weipingzhang maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition AT longli maizepeanutintercroppinghasgreatersynergisticeffectsandhomefieldadvantagesthanmaizesoybeanonstrawdecomposition |