Regeneration and reprogramming compared

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Dedifferentiation occurs naturally in mature cell types during epimorphic regeneration in fish and some amphibians. Dedifferentiation also occurs in the induction of pluripotent stem cells when a set of transcription factors (<it&...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robles Vanesa, Christen Bea, Raya Marina, Paramonov Ida, Belmonte Juan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-01-01
Series:BMC Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/8/5
_version_ 1818789773570998272
author Robles Vanesa
Christen Bea
Raya Marina
Paramonov Ida
Belmonte Juan
author_facet Robles Vanesa
Christen Bea
Raya Marina
Paramonov Ida
Belmonte Juan
author_sort Robles Vanesa
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Dedifferentiation occurs naturally in mature cell types during epimorphic regeneration in fish and some amphibians. Dedifferentiation also occurs in the induction of pluripotent stem cells when a set of transcription factors (<it>Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 </it>and <it>c-Myc</it>) is over expressed in mature cell types.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We hypothesised that there are parallels between dedifferentiation or reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells and the natural process of dedifferentiation during epimorphic regeneration. We analysed expression levels of the most commonly used pluripotency associated factors in regenerating and non-regenerating tissue and compared them with levels in a pluripotent reference cell. We found that some of the pluripotency associated factors (<it>oct4/pou5f1, sox2, c-myc, klf4, tert, sall4, zic3, dppa2/4 </it>and <it>fut1</it>, a homologue of <it>ssea1</it>) were expressed before and during regeneration and that at least two of these factors (<it>oct4, sox2</it>) were also required for normal fin regeneration in the zebrafish. However these factors were not upregulated during regeneration as would be expected if blastema cells acquired pluripotency.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>By comparing cells from the regeneration blastema with embryonic pluripotent reference cells we found that induced pluripotent stem and blastema cells do not share pluripotency. However, during blastema formation some of the key reprogramming factors are both expressed and are also required for regeneration to take place. We therefore propose a link between partially reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells and the half way state of blastema cells and suggest that a common mechanism might be regulating these two processes.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T14:44:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6c4725c85bd46dd9175a76e3b5f56b5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1741-7007
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T14:44:53Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Biology
spelling doaj.art-b6c4725c85bd46dd9175a76e3b5f56b52022-12-21T21:04:17ZengBMCBMC Biology1741-70072010-01-0181510.1186/1741-7007-8-5Regeneration and reprogramming comparedRobles VanesaChristen BeaRaya MarinaParamonov IdaBelmonte Juan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Dedifferentiation occurs naturally in mature cell types during epimorphic regeneration in fish and some amphibians. Dedifferentiation also occurs in the induction of pluripotent stem cells when a set of transcription factors (<it>Oct4, Sox2, Klf4 </it>and <it>c-Myc</it>) is over expressed in mature cell types.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We hypothesised that there are parallels between dedifferentiation or reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells and the natural process of dedifferentiation during epimorphic regeneration. We analysed expression levels of the most commonly used pluripotency associated factors in regenerating and non-regenerating tissue and compared them with levels in a pluripotent reference cell. We found that some of the pluripotency associated factors (<it>oct4/pou5f1, sox2, c-myc, klf4, tert, sall4, zic3, dppa2/4 </it>and <it>fut1</it>, a homologue of <it>ssea1</it>) were expressed before and during regeneration and that at least two of these factors (<it>oct4, sox2</it>) were also required for normal fin regeneration in the zebrafish. However these factors were not upregulated during regeneration as would be expected if blastema cells acquired pluripotency.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>By comparing cells from the regeneration blastema with embryonic pluripotent reference cells we found that induced pluripotent stem and blastema cells do not share pluripotency. However, during blastema formation some of the key reprogramming factors are both expressed and are also required for regeneration to take place. We therefore propose a link between partially reprogrammed induced pluripotent stem cells and the half way state of blastema cells and suggest that a common mechanism might be regulating these two processes.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/8/5
spellingShingle Robles Vanesa
Christen Bea
Raya Marina
Paramonov Ida
Belmonte Juan
Regeneration and reprogramming compared
BMC Biology
title Regeneration and reprogramming compared
title_full Regeneration and reprogramming compared
title_fullStr Regeneration and reprogramming compared
title_full_unstemmed Regeneration and reprogramming compared
title_short Regeneration and reprogramming compared
title_sort regeneration and reprogramming compared
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/8/5
work_keys_str_mv AT roblesvanesa regenerationandreprogrammingcompared
AT christenbea regenerationandreprogrammingcompared
AT rayamarina regenerationandreprogrammingcompared
AT paramonovida regenerationandreprogrammingcompared
AT belmontejuan regenerationandreprogrammingcompared