Accuracy assessment and improvement of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs by polynomial and optimization algorithm: A case study (Khuzestan Province, Iran)

Satellite digital elevation models (DEMs) are used for decision-making in various fields. Therefore, evaluating and improving vertical accuracy of DEM can increase the quality of end products. This article aimed to increase the vertical accuracy of most popular satellite DEMs (i.e., the ASTER, Shutt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saberi Azim, Kabolizadeh Mostafa, Rangzan Kazem, Abrehdary Majid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2023-02-01
Series:Open Geosciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0455
_version_ 1797848722454872064
author Saberi Azim
Kabolizadeh Mostafa
Rangzan Kazem
Abrehdary Majid
author_facet Saberi Azim
Kabolizadeh Mostafa
Rangzan Kazem
Abrehdary Majid
author_sort Saberi Azim
collection DOAJ
description Satellite digital elevation models (DEMs) are used for decision-making in various fields. Therefore, evaluating and improving vertical accuracy of DEM can increase the quality of end products. This article aimed to increase the vertical accuracy of most popular satellite DEMs (i.e., the ASTER, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission [SRTM], Forest And Buildings removed Copernicus DEM [FABDEM], and Multi-Error-Removed Improved-Terrain [MERIT]) using the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. For this purpose, at first, the vertical error of DEMs was estimated via ground truth data. Next, a second-order polynomial was applied to model the vertical error in the study area. To select the polynomial with the highest accuracy, employed for vertical error modeling, the coefficients of the polynomial have been optimized using the PSO algorithm. Finally, the efficiency of the proposed algorithm has been evaluated by other ground truth data and in situ observations. The results show that the mean absolute error (MAE) of SRTM DEM is 4.83 m while this factor for ASTER DEM is 5.35 m, for FABDEM is 4.28, and for MERIT is 3.87. The obtained results indicated that the proposed model could improve the MAE of vertical accuracy of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs to 0.83, 0.51, 0.37, and 0.29 m, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T18:32:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6d1eadf7ffb480d9e1654c5755447b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2391-5447
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T18:32:13Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Open Geosciences
spelling doaj.art-b6d1eadf7ffb480d9e1654c5755447b82023-04-11T17:07:16ZengDe GruyterOpen Geosciences2391-54472023-02-011511031310.1515/geo-2022-0455Accuracy assessment and improvement of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs by polynomial and optimization algorithm: A case study (Khuzestan Province, Iran)Saberi Azim0Kabolizadeh Mostafa1Rangzan Kazem2Abrehdary Majid3Department of RS and GIS, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, IranDepartment of RS and GIS, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, IranDepartment of RS and GIS, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, IranUniversity West, Trollhättan, SwedenSatellite digital elevation models (DEMs) are used for decision-making in various fields. Therefore, evaluating and improving vertical accuracy of DEM can increase the quality of end products. This article aimed to increase the vertical accuracy of most popular satellite DEMs (i.e., the ASTER, Shuttle Radar Topography Mission [SRTM], Forest And Buildings removed Copernicus DEM [FABDEM], and Multi-Error-Removed Improved-Terrain [MERIT]) using the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. For this purpose, at first, the vertical error of DEMs was estimated via ground truth data. Next, a second-order polynomial was applied to model the vertical error in the study area. To select the polynomial with the highest accuracy, employed for vertical error modeling, the coefficients of the polynomial have been optimized using the PSO algorithm. Finally, the efficiency of the proposed algorithm has been evaluated by other ground truth data and in situ observations. The results show that the mean absolute error (MAE) of SRTM DEM is 4.83 m while this factor for ASTER DEM is 5.35 m, for FABDEM is 4.28, and for MERIT is 3.87. The obtained results indicated that the proposed model could improve the MAE of vertical accuracy of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs to 0.83, 0.51, 0.37, and 0.29 m, respectively.https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0455srtmaster demdem accuracy assessmentoptimization algorithmdem accuracy improvement
spellingShingle Saberi Azim
Kabolizadeh Mostafa
Rangzan Kazem
Abrehdary Majid
Accuracy assessment and improvement of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs by polynomial and optimization algorithm: A case study (Khuzestan Province, Iran)
Open Geosciences
srtm
aster dem
dem accuracy assessment
optimization algorithm
dem accuracy improvement
title Accuracy assessment and improvement of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs by polynomial and optimization algorithm: A case study (Khuzestan Province, Iran)
title_full Accuracy assessment and improvement of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs by polynomial and optimization algorithm: A case study (Khuzestan Province, Iran)
title_fullStr Accuracy assessment and improvement of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs by polynomial and optimization algorithm: A case study (Khuzestan Province, Iran)
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy assessment and improvement of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs by polynomial and optimization algorithm: A case study (Khuzestan Province, Iran)
title_short Accuracy assessment and improvement of SRTM, ASTER, FABDEM, and MERIT DEMs by polynomial and optimization algorithm: A case study (Khuzestan Province, Iran)
title_sort accuracy assessment and improvement of srtm aster fabdem and merit dems by polynomial and optimization algorithm a case study khuzestan province iran
topic srtm
aster dem
dem accuracy assessment
optimization algorithm
dem accuracy improvement
url https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2022-0455
work_keys_str_mv AT saberiazim accuracyassessmentandimprovementofsrtmasterfabdemandmeritdemsbypolynomialandoptimizationalgorithmacasestudykhuzestanprovinceiran
AT kabolizadehmostafa accuracyassessmentandimprovementofsrtmasterfabdemandmeritdemsbypolynomialandoptimizationalgorithmacasestudykhuzestanprovinceiran
AT rangzankazem accuracyassessmentandimprovementofsrtmasterfabdemandmeritdemsbypolynomialandoptimizationalgorithmacasestudykhuzestanprovinceiran
AT abrehdarymajid accuracyassessmentandimprovementofsrtmasterfabdemandmeritdemsbypolynomialandoptimizationalgorithmacasestudykhuzestanprovinceiran