Can database-level MEDLINE exclusion filters in Embase and CINAHL be used to remove duplicate records without loss of relevant studies in systematic reviews? An exploratory study
Objective: To investigate whether using database filters to remove MEDLINE results within Embase (OVID) and CINAHL (EBSCO) would result in fewer records, without leading to any loss of studies included in the final review. Methods: We reviewed the included studies from a sample set of 20 Cochrane...
Main Authors: | Zahra Premji, Heather Ganshorn |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Alberta
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association |
Online Access: | https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/jchla/index.php/jchla/article/view/29437 |
Similar Items
-
Statistical Measures Alone Cannot Determine Which Database (BNI, CINAHL, MEDLINE, or EMBASE) Is the Most Useful for Searching Undergraduate Nursing Topics
by: Giovanna Badia
Published: (2011-03-01) -
Development and validation of paired MEDLINE and Embase search filters for cost-utility studies
by: Wesley Hubbard, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Search strategies to identify observational studies in MEDLINE and Embase
by: Li, Li, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Identifying observational studies of surgical interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE
by: Burr Jennifer, et al.
Published: (2006-08-01) -
Development and validation of search filters to identify articles on deprescribing in Medline and Embase
by: Thomas Morel, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)