Near vision correction and work productivity among textile workers

Purpose: Uncorrected presbyopia (near vision impairment) is prevalent in approximately 517 million people worldwide; this prevalence ranges from 30% to 80% in Africa. Good near vision is needed for a range of tasks; therefore, uncorrected presbyopia can negatively affect the quality of life of indiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kovin S. Naidoo, Jyoti Jaggernath, Farai S. Chinanayi, Ving F. Chan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 2016-11-01
Series:African Vision and Eye Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/357
_version_ 1818163630358659072
author Kovin S. Naidoo
Jyoti Jaggernath
Farai S. Chinanayi
Ving F. Chan
author_facet Kovin S. Naidoo
Jyoti Jaggernath
Farai S. Chinanayi
Ving F. Chan
author_sort Kovin S. Naidoo
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Uncorrected presbyopia (near vision impairment) is prevalent in approximately 517 million people worldwide; this prevalence ranges from 30% to 80% in Africa. Good near vision is needed for a range of tasks; therefore, uncorrected presbyopia can negatively affect the quality of life of individuals, impact families and society, and potentially have negative implications on employment and labour work productivity. This study aimed to determine the impact of near vision correction on the work productivity of clothing factory workers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study and sampled all workers who were aged 40 years and older and who performed near vision tasks (e.g. machinist, cutter, zip sewer, clothing pressers and quality controllers) in seven clothing factories. We included workers who were employed for at least 3 months and whose uncorrected near visual acuity could be improved and corrected to better than 6/9 with spectacle correction. Workers were provided with near vision spectacles, and changes in their work productivity were evaluated after 6 months, using the factories’ output records as an indicator for measurement. Results: The final sample comprised 268 individuals, with 56% of African origin (n = 151) and 49% (n = 115) Indian origin. There were mainly females (94%) in the sample, and the average age was 48 years (± 5.5 years, range 40–62 years). The overall post-correction mean production score (70.5 [SD ± 19.9]) was significantly higher than the overall pre-correction mean production score (67.0 [SD ±20.3]) (p < 0.001). The average change in production score was 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7–4.3), and the percent difference was 6.4% (95% CI 5.2–7.7). The increase in work productivity was significant for individuals of African (p < 0.001) and Indian origins (p < 0.001) but not for those of mixed race (p = 0.364; n = 2). Post-correction, the production scores of women increased significantly by 6.6% (95% CI 5.3–7.9) (p < 0.001). Significant increases in production scores were recorded for machinists, clothing pressers and quality controllers. Conclusion: Significant changes in work productivity among the workers with presbyopic correction were recorded. The clothing industry served as a favourable setting to examine changes in work productivity, obtaining reliable scores of output. This study was used as an exploratory investigation, and the results will be used to inform a randomised-controlled study that will provide stronger validation for the hypothesis that near vision correction impacts work productivity
first_indexed 2024-12-11T16:52:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6ed52c8bfe04bce8a1458b7a38a4bff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2413-3183
2410-1516
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T16:52:37Z
publishDate 2016-11-01
publisher AOSIS
record_format Article
series African Vision and Eye Health
spelling doaj.art-b6ed52c8bfe04bce8a1458b7a38a4bff2022-12-22T00:58:03ZengAOSISAfrican Vision and Eye Health2413-31832410-15162016-11-01751e1e410.4102/aveh.v75i1.357325Near vision correction and work productivity among textile workersKovin S. Naidoo0Jyoti Jaggernath1Farai S. Chinanayi2Ving F. Chan3Brien Holden Vision Institute, Durban; African Vision Research Institute, University of KwaZulu-NatalAfrican Vision Research Institute, University of KwaZulu-NatalAfrican Vision Research Institute, University of KwaZulu-NatalBrien Holden Vision Institute, DurbanPurpose: Uncorrected presbyopia (near vision impairment) is prevalent in approximately 517 million people worldwide; this prevalence ranges from 30% to 80% in Africa. Good near vision is needed for a range of tasks; therefore, uncorrected presbyopia can negatively affect the quality of life of individuals, impact families and society, and potentially have negative implications on employment and labour work productivity. This study aimed to determine the impact of near vision correction on the work productivity of clothing factory workers. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study and sampled all workers who were aged 40 years and older and who performed near vision tasks (e.g. machinist, cutter, zip sewer, clothing pressers and quality controllers) in seven clothing factories. We included workers who were employed for at least 3 months and whose uncorrected near visual acuity could be improved and corrected to better than 6/9 with spectacle correction. Workers were provided with near vision spectacles, and changes in their work productivity were evaluated after 6 months, using the factories’ output records as an indicator for measurement. Results: The final sample comprised 268 individuals, with 56% of African origin (n = 151) and 49% (n = 115) Indian origin. There were mainly females (94%) in the sample, and the average age was 48 years (± 5.5 years, range 40–62 years). The overall post-correction mean production score (70.5 [SD ± 19.9]) was significantly higher than the overall pre-correction mean production score (67.0 [SD ±20.3]) (p < 0.001). The average change in production score was 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7–4.3), and the percent difference was 6.4% (95% CI 5.2–7.7). The increase in work productivity was significant for individuals of African (p < 0.001) and Indian origins (p < 0.001) but not for those of mixed race (p = 0.364; n = 2). Post-correction, the production scores of women increased significantly by 6.6% (95% CI 5.3–7.9) (p < 0.001). Significant increases in production scores were recorded for machinists, clothing pressers and quality controllers. Conclusion: Significant changes in work productivity among the workers with presbyopic correction were recorded. The clothing industry served as a favourable setting to examine changes in work productivity, obtaining reliable scores of output. This study was used as an exploratory investigation, and the results will be used to inform a randomised-controlled study that will provide stronger validation for the hypothesis that near vision correction impacts work productivityhttps://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/357Public Health
spellingShingle Kovin S. Naidoo
Jyoti Jaggernath
Farai S. Chinanayi
Ving F. Chan
Near vision correction and work productivity among textile workers
African Vision and Eye Health
Public Health
title Near vision correction and work productivity among textile workers
title_full Near vision correction and work productivity among textile workers
title_fullStr Near vision correction and work productivity among textile workers
title_full_unstemmed Near vision correction and work productivity among textile workers
title_short Near vision correction and work productivity among textile workers
title_sort near vision correction and work productivity among textile workers
topic Public Health
url https://avehjournal.org/index.php/aveh/article/view/357
work_keys_str_mv AT kovinsnaidoo nearvisioncorrectionandworkproductivityamongtextileworkers
AT jyotijaggernath nearvisioncorrectionandworkproductivityamongtextileworkers
AT faraischinanayi nearvisioncorrectionandworkproductivityamongtextileworkers
AT vingfchan nearvisioncorrectionandworkproductivityamongtextileworkers