A Reassessment of Archaeological Grey Literature: semantics and paradoxes

This article takes a fresh view of unpublished archaeological reports, common in archaeological practice in England since the advent of PPG16. Although these reports are almost ubiquitously referred to as 'grey literature', they are but a facet of a larger corpus of publication and dissemi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tim N.L. Evans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of York 2015-06-01
Series:Internet Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue40/6/index.html
_version_ 1797369963314413568
author Tim N.L. Evans
author_facet Tim N.L. Evans
author_sort Tim N.L. Evans
collection DOAJ
description This article takes a fresh view of unpublished archaeological reports, common in archaeological practice in England since the advent of PPG16. Although these reports are almost ubiquitously referred to as 'grey literature', they are but a facet of a larger corpus of publication and dissemination techniques used by the archaeological community. It is argued that the term 'grey' has become synonymous with a liminal status and inferior quality that is in fact contrary to the realities of the increased online publication of fieldwork reports. The article also considers the current upsurge in research projects and academic theses using fieldwork reports, and highlights the necessity that findings from research are fed back into the curatorial sector and baseline data to inform all aspects of archaeological work rather than isolated in published literature often unavailable to those outside of academia. Finally, the article argues that although the challenge of increased access – via the web – is being met, this is not consistent across the country, leading to lacunae in the information landscape. Furthermore, as the number of online reports grows into the tens of thousands there is a need for greater sophistication and archaeological context in the accompanying metadata, to aid classification and reuse.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:54:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b6fe21045d024425829d4c2813ceb2ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1363-5387
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:54:34Z
publishDate 2015-06-01
publisher University of York
record_format Article
series Internet Archaeology
spelling doaj.art-b6fe21045d024425829d4c2813ceb2ef2024-01-02T05:40:37ZengUniversity of YorkInternet Archaeology1363-53872015-06-014010.11141/ia.40.6A Reassessment of Archaeological Grey Literature: semantics and paradoxesTim N.L. Evans0University of YorkThis article takes a fresh view of unpublished archaeological reports, common in archaeological practice in England since the advent of PPG16. Although these reports are almost ubiquitously referred to as 'grey literature', they are but a facet of a larger corpus of publication and dissemination techniques used by the archaeological community. It is argued that the term 'grey' has become synonymous with a liminal status and inferior quality that is in fact contrary to the realities of the increased online publication of fieldwork reports. The article also considers the current upsurge in research projects and academic theses using fieldwork reports, and highlights the necessity that findings from research are fed back into the curatorial sector and baseline data to inform all aspects of archaeological work rather than isolated in published literature often unavailable to those outside of academia. Finally, the article argues that although the challenge of increased access – via the web – is being met, this is not consistent across the country, leading to lacunae in the information landscape. Furthermore, as the number of online reports grows into the tens of thousands there is a need for greater sophistication and archaeological context in the accompanying metadata, to aid classification and reuse.http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue40/6/index.htmlGrey literatureexcavationpublicationEnglandPPG16
spellingShingle Tim N.L. Evans
A Reassessment of Archaeological Grey Literature: semantics and paradoxes
Internet Archaeology
Grey literature
excavation
publication
England
PPG16
title A Reassessment of Archaeological Grey Literature: semantics and paradoxes
title_full A Reassessment of Archaeological Grey Literature: semantics and paradoxes
title_fullStr A Reassessment of Archaeological Grey Literature: semantics and paradoxes
title_full_unstemmed A Reassessment of Archaeological Grey Literature: semantics and paradoxes
title_short A Reassessment of Archaeological Grey Literature: semantics and paradoxes
title_sort reassessment of archaeological grey literature semantics and paradoxes
topic Grey literature
excavation
publication
England
PPG16
url http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue40/6/index.html
work_keys_str_mv AT timnlevans areassessmentofarchaeologicalgreyliteraturesemanticsandparadoxes
AT timnlevans reassessmentofarchaeologicalgreyliteraturesemanticsandparadoxes