Development and Evaluation of a Fluctuating Plume Model for Odor Impact Assessment

For environmental odor nuisance, it is extremely important to identify the instantaneous concentration statistics. In this work, a Fluctuating Plume Model for different statistical moments is proposed. It provides data in terms of mean concentrations, variance, and intensity of concentration. The 90...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marzio Invernizzi, Federica Capra, Roberto Sozzi, Laura Capelli, Selena Sironi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/8/3310
_version_ 1797538559255642112
author Marzio Invernizzi
Federica Capra
Roberto Sozzi
Laura Capelli
Selena Sironi
author_facet Marzio Invernizzi
Federica Capra
Roberto Sozzi
Laura Capelli
Selena Sironi
author_sort Marzio Invernizzi
collection DOAJ
description For environmental odor nuisance, it is extremely important to identify the instantaneous concentration statistics. In this work, a Fluctuating Plume Model for different statistical moments is proposed. It provides data in terms of mean concentrations, variance, and intensity of concentration. The 90th percentile peak-to-mean factor, <i>R</i><sub>90</sub>, was tested here by comparing it with the experimental results (Uttenweiler field experiment), considering different Probability Distribution Functions (PDFs): Gamma and the Modified Weibull. Seventy-two percent of the simulated mean concentration values fell within a factor 2 compared to the experimental ones: the model was judged acceptable. Both the modelled results for standard deviation, <i>σ<sub>C</sub></i>, and concentration intensity, <i>I<sub>c</sub></i>, overestimate the experimental data. This evidence can be due to the non-ideality of the measurement system. The propagation of those errors to the estimation of <i>R</i><sub>90</sub> is complex, but the ranges covered are quite repeatable: the obtained values are 1–3 for the Gamma, 1.5–4 for Modified Weibull PDF, and experimental ones from 1.4 to 3.6.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:33:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b713ca2e1c5448adb5eccbc467f37f39
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:33:08Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-b713ca2e1c5448adb5eccbc467f37f392023-11-21T14:31:02ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-04-01118331010.3390/app11083310Development and Evaluation of a Fluctuating Plume Model for Odor Impact AssessmentMarzio Invernizzi0Federica Capra1Roberto Sozzi2Laura Capelli3Selena Sironi4Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, ItalyIndependent Researcher, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering “Giulio Natta”, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, ItalyFor environmental odor nuisance, it is extremely important to identify the instantaneous concentration statistics. In this work, a Fluctuating Plume Model for different statistical moments is proposed. It provides data in terms of mean concentrations, variance, and intensity of concentration. The 90th percentile peak-to-mean factor, <i>R</i><sub>90</sub>, was tested here by comparing it with the experimental results (Uttenweiler field experiment), considering different Probability Distribution Functions (PDFs): Gamma and the Modified Weibull. Seventy-two percent of the simulated mean concentration values fell within a factor 2 compared to the experimental ones: the model was judged acceptable. Both the modelled results for standard deviation, <i>σ<sub>C</sub></i>, and concentration intensity, <i>I<sub>c</sub></i>, overestimate the experimental data. This evidence can be due to the non-ideality of the measurement system. The propagation of those errors to the estimation of <i>R</i><sub>90</sub> is complex, but the ranges covered are quite repeatable: the obtained values are 1–3 for the Gamma, 1.5–4 for Modified Weibull PDF, and experimental ones from 1.4 to 3.6.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/8/3310odor impact assessmentdispersion modellingpeak-to-meanconcentration fluctuationfluctuating plume model
spellingShingle Marzio Invernizzi
Federica Capra
Roberto Sozzi
Laura Capelli
Selena Sironi
Development and Evaluation of a Fluctuating Plume Model for Odor Impact Assessment
Applied Sciences
odor impact assessment
dispersion modelling
peak-to-mean
concentration fluctuation
fluctuating plume model
title Development and Evaluation of a Fluctuating Plume Model for Odor Impact Assessment
title_full Development and Evaluation of a Fluctuating Plume Model for Odor Impact Assessment
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of a Fluctuating Plume Model for Odor Impact Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of a Fluctuating Plume Model for Odor Impact Assessment
title_short Development and Evaluation of a Fluctuating Plume Model for Odor Impact Assessment
title_sort development and evaluation of a fluctuating plume model for odor impact assessment
topic odor impact assessment
dispersion modelling
peak-to-mean
concentration fluctuation
fluctuating plume model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/8/3310
work_keys_str_mv AT marzioinvernizzi developmentandevaluationofafluctuatingplumemodelforodorimpactassessment
AT federicacapra developmentandevaluationofafluctuatingplumemodelforodorimpactassessment
AT robertosozzi developmentandevaluationofafluctuatingplumemodelforodorimpactassessment
AT lauracapelli developmentandevaluationofafluctuatingplumemodelforodorimpactassessment
AT selenasironi developmentandevaluationofafluctuatingplumemodelforodorimpactassessment