Impact analysis of processing strategies for long-term GPS zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD)

<p>Homogenized atmospheric water vapour data are an important prerequisite for climate analysis. Compared with other techniques, GPS has an inherent homogeneity advantage, but it still requires reprocessing and homogenization to eliminate impacts of applied strategy and observation environment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J. Bai, Y. Lou, W. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Z. Zhang, C. Shi, J. Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-11-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/5249/2023/amt-16-5249-2023.pdf
Description
Summary:<p>Homogenized atmospheric water vapour data are an important prerequisite for climate analysis. Compared with other techniques, GPS has an inherent homogeneity advantage, but it still requires reprocessing and homogenization to eliminate impacts of applied strategy and observation environmental changes where a selection of proper processing strategies is critical. This paper comprehensively investigates the influence of the mapping function, the elevation cut-off angle and homogenization on long-term reprocessing results, in particular for zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) products, using GPS observations at 44 IGS (International GNSS Service) stations during 1995 to 2014. In the analysis, for the first time, we included the mapping function (the latest Vienna mapping function, VMF3) and exploited homogenized radiosonde data as a reference for ZTD trend evaluations. Our analysis shows that both site position and ZTD solutions achieved the best accuracy when using VMF3 and the 3<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> elevation cut-off angle. Regarding the long-term ZTD trends, homogenization reduced the trend inconsistency among different elevation cut-off angles. ZTD trend results show that the impact of mapping functions is very small, with a maximum difference of 0.19 mm yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>. On the other hand, the discrepancy can reach 0.60 mm yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> using different elevation cut-off angles. Low-elevation cut-off angles (3<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> or 7<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span>) are suggested for the best estimates of ZTD reprocessing time series when compared to homogenized radiosonde data or ERA5 reference time series.</p>
ISSN:1867-1381
1867-8548