Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion
BackgroundMalignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a serious complication in patients with advanced malignant tumors, which indicates a poor prognosis. However, its clinical manifestations lack specificity, making it challenging to distinguish MPE from benign pericardial effusion (BPE). The aim of th...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1012664/full |
_version_ | 1811320389991661568 |
---|---|
author | Xiaxia Jin Lingling Hu Meidan Fang Qiaofei Zheng Yuan Yuan Guoguang Lu Tao Li |
author_facet | Xiaxia Jin Lingling Hu Meidan Fang Qiaofei Zheng Yuan Yuan Guoguang Lu Tao Li |
author_sort | Xiaxia Jin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | BackgroundMalignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a serious complication in patients with advanced malignant tumors, which indicates a poor prognosis. However, its clinical manifestations lack specificity, making it challenging to distinguish MPE from benign pericardial effusion (BPE). The aim of this study was to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram to discriminate MPE from BPE through easy-to-obtain clinical parameters.MethodsIn this study, the patients with pericardial effusion who underwent diagnostic pericardiocentesis in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from February 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The eligible patients were divided into a training group (n = 161) and a validation group (n = 66) according to the admission time. The nomogram model was established using the meaningful indicators screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression. Then, a new scoring system was constructed based on this nomogram model.ResultsThe new scoring system included loss of weight (3 points), no fever (4 points), mediastinal lymph node enlargement (2 points), pleural effusion (6 points), effusion adenosine deaminase (ADA≦18U/L) (5 points), effusion lactate dehydrogenase (LDH>1033U/L) (7 points), and effusion carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA>4.9g/mL) (10 points). With the optimal cut-off value was 16 points, the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) for identifying MPE were 0.974, 95.1%, 91.0%, 85.6%, 96.8%, 10.56 and 0.05, respectively, in the training set and 0.950, 83.3%, 95.2%, 90.9%, 90.9%, 17.50, and 0.18, respectively, in the validation set. The scoring system also showed good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating MPE caused by lung cancer from tuberculous pericardial effusion (TPE) and MPE including atypical cell from BPE.ConclusionThe new scoring system based on seven easily available variables has good diagnostic value in distinguishing MPE from BPE. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T12:58:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-b725fed41cef4686b940fb76e877df2d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2234-943X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T12:58:54Z |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Oncology |
spelling | doaj.art-b725fed41cef4686b940fb76e877df2d2022-12-22T02:45:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2022-12-011210.3389/fonc.2022.10126641012664Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusionXiaxia Jin0Lingling Hu1Meidan Fang2Qiaofei Zheng3Yuan Yuan4Guoguang Lu5Tao Li6Department of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular medicine, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaBackgroundMalignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a serious complication in patients with advanced malignant tumors, which indicates a poor prognosis. However, its clinical manifestations lack specificity, making it challenging to distinguish MPE from benign pericardial effusion (BPE). The aim of this study was to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram to discriminate MPE from BPE through easy-to-obtain clinical parameters.MethodsIn this study, the patients with pericardial effusion who underwent diagnostic pericardiocentesis in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from February 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The eligible patients were divided into a training group (n = 161) and a validation group (n = 66) according to the admission time. The nomogram model was established using the meaningful indicators screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression. Then, a new scoring system was constructed based on this nomogram model.ResultsThe new scoring system included loss of weight (3 points), no fever (4 points), mediastinal lymph node enlargement (2 points), pleural effusion (6 points), effusion adenosine deaminase (ADA≦18U/L) (5 points), effusion lactate dehydrogenase (LDH>1033U/L) (7 points), and effusion carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA>4.9g/mL) (10 points). With the optimal cut-off value was 16 points, the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) for identifying MPE were 0.974, 95.1%, 91.0%, 85.6%, 96.8%, 10.56 and 0.05, respectively, in the training set and 0.950, 83.3%, 95.2%, 90.9%, 90.9%, 17.50, and 0.18, respectively, in the validation set. The scoring system also showed good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating MPE caused by lung cancer from tuberculous pericardial effusion (TPE) and MPE including atypical cell from BPE.ConclusionThe new scoring system based on seven easily available variables has good diagnostic value in distinguishing MPE from BPE.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1012664/fullmalignant pericardial effusiondiagnosisnomogramscoring systematypical cell |
spellingShingle | Xiaxia Jin Lingling Hu Meidan Fang Qiaofei Zheng Yuan Yuan Guoguang Lu Tao Li Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion Frontiers in Oncology malignant pericardial effusion diagnosis nomogram scoring system atypical cell |
title | Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion |
title_full | Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion |
title_fullStr | Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion |
title_short | Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion |
title_sort | development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion |
topic | malignant pericardial effusion diagnosis nomogram scoring system atypical cell |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1012664/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiaxiajin developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion AT linglinghu developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion AT meidanfang developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion AT qiaofeizheng developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion AT yuanyuan developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion AT guoguanglu developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion AT taoli developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion |