Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion

BackgroundMalignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a serious complication in patients with advanced malignant tumors, which indicates a poor prognosis. However, its clinical manifestations lack specificity, making it challenging to distinguish MPE from benign pericardial effusion (BPE). The aim of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaxia Jin, Lingling Hu, Meidan Fang, Qiaofei Zheng, Yuan Yuan, Guoguang Lu, Tao Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1012664/full
_version_ 1811320389991661568
author Xiaxia Jin
Lingling Hu
Meidan Fang
Qiaofei Zheng
Yuan Yuan
Guoguang Lu
Tao Li
author_facet Xiaxia Jin
Lingling Hu
Meidan Fang
Qiaofei Zheng
Yuan Yuan
Guoguang Lu
Tao Li
author_sort Xiaxia Jin
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundMalignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a serious complication in patients with advanced malignant tumors, which indicates a poor prognosis. However, its clinical manifestations lack specificity, making it challenging to distinguish MPE from benign pericardial effusion (BPE). The aim of this study was to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram to discriminate MPE from BPE through easy-to-obtain clinical parameters.MethodsIn this study, the patients with pericardial effusion who underwent diagnostic pericardiocentesis in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from February 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The eligible patients were divided into a training group (n = 161) and a validation group (n = 66) according to the admission time. The nomogram model was established using the meaningful indicators screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression. Then, a new scoring system was constructed based on this nomogram model.ResultsThe new scoring system included loss of weight (3 points), no fever (4 points), mediastinal lymph node enlargement (2 points), pleural effusion (6 points), effusion adenosine deaminase (ADA≦18U/L) (5 points), effusion lactate dehydrogenase (LDH>1033U/L) (7 points), and effusion carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA>4.9g/mL) (10 points). With the optimal cut-off value was 16 points, the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) for identifying MPE were 0.974, 95.1%, 91.0%, 85.6%, 96.8%, 10.56 and 0.05, respectively, in the training set and 0.950, 83.3%, 95.2%, 90.9%, 90.9%, 17.50, and 0.18, respectively, in the validation set. The scoring system also showed good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating MPE caused by lung cancer from tuberculous pericardial effusion (TPE) and MPE including atypical cell from BPE.ConclusionThe new scoring system based on seven easily available variables has good diagnostic value in distinguishing MPE from BPE.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T12:58:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b725fed41cef4686b940fb76e877df2d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T12:58:54Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-b725fed41cef4686b940fb76e877df2d2022-12-22T02:45:58ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2022-12-011210.3389/fonc.2022.10126641012664Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusionXiaxia Jin0Lingling Hu1Meidan Fang2Qiaofei Zheng3Yuan Yuan4Guoguang Lu5Tao Li6Department of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaDepartment of Cardiovascular medicine, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Taizhou Enze Medical Center (Group), Linhai, Zhejiang, ChinaBackgroundMalignant pericardial effusion (MPE) is a serious complication in patients with advanced malignant tumors, which indicates a poor prognosis. However, its clinical manifestations lack specificity, making it challenging to distinguish MPE from benign pericardial effusion (BPE). The aim of this study was to develop and validate a scoring system based on a nomogram to discriminate MPE from BPE through easy-to-obtain clinical parameters.MethodsIn this study, the patients with pericardial effusion who underwent diagnostic pericardiocentesis in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from February 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The eligible patients were divided into a training group (n = 161) and a validation group (n = 66) according to the admission time. The nomogram model was established using the meaningful indicators screened by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression. Then, a new scoring system was constructed based on this nomogram model.ResultsThe new scoring system included loss of weight (3 points), no fever (4 points), mediastinal lymph node enlargement (2 points), pleural effusion (6 points), effusion adenosine deaminase (ADA≦18U/L) (5 points), effusion lactate dehydrogenase (LDH>1033U/L) (7 points), and effusion carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA>4.9g/mL) (10 points). With the optimal cut-off value was 16 points, the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) for identifying MPE were 0.974, 95.1%, 91.0%, 85.6%, 96.8%, 10.56 and 0.05, respectively, in the training set and 0.950, 83.3%, 95.2%, 90.9%, 90.9%, 17.50, and 0.18, respectively, in the validation set. The scoring system also showed good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating MPE caused by lung cancer from tuberculous pericardial effusion (TPE) and MPE including atypical cell from BPE.ConclusionThe new scoring system based on seven easily available variables has good diagnostic value in distinguishing MPE from BPE.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1012664/fullmalignant pericardial effusiondiagnosisnomogramscoring systematypical cell
spellingShingle Xiaxia Jin
Lingling Hu
Meidan Fang
Qiaofei Zheng
Yuan Yuan
Guoguang Lu
Tao Li
Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion
Frontiers in Oncology
malignant pericardial effusion
diagnosis
nomogram
scoring system
atypical cell
title Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion
title_full Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion
title_fullStr Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion
title_short Development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion
title_sort development and validation a simple scoring system to identify malignant pericardial effusion
topic malignant pericardial effusion
diagnosis
nomogram
scoring system
atypical cell
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.1012664/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaxiajin developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion
AT linglinghu developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion
AT meidanfang developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion
AT qiaofeizheng developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion
AT yuanyuan developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion
AT guoguanglu developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion
AT taoli developmentandvalidationasimplescoringsystemtoidentifymalignantpericardialeffusion