An Appraisal of “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”

This paper evaluates Caesar Alimsinya Atuire’s essay “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”. Atuire’s essay aims to contribute to global ethical discourse by articulating a systematic account of an African ethical perspective, specifically focusin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Motsamai MOLEFE, Elphus MUADE
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Conversational Society of Philosophy (CSP) 2023-07-01
Series:Arụmarụka
Subjects:
_version_ 1797327716309008384
author Motsamai MOLEFE
Elphus MUADE
author_facet Motsamai MOLEFE
Elphus MUADE
author_sort Motsamai MOLEFE
collection DOAJ
description This paper evaluates Caesar Alimsinya Atuire’s essay “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”. Atuire’s essay aims to contribute to global ethical discourse by articulating a systematic account of an African ethical perspective, specifically focusing on the themes of personhood, moral status and the legal question of abortion. We make three objections against Atuire’s essay. Firstly, we argue that a plausible approach to African personhood must consider both its individualistic and relational features, rather than merely emphasize the relational component. The second objection focuses on the theory of moral status, and it has two parts: (a) we insist that a correct understanding of the concept of moral status must construe it as a moral patiency rather than a moral agency term. We believe that Atuire’s view errs in regarding it as the latter. (b) we argue that contrary to Atuire’s assertions, Thaddeus Metz’s friendliness theory of moral status does a better job than Atuire’s object moral status (OMS) and subject moral status (SMS) views of moral status. The final objection is that maybe before we reflect on the legal status of abortion, as ethicists, we should begin by considering the ethical status of abortion in light of African axiological resources. In the final analysis, the paper appreciates Atuire’s contribution to African ethical theory, but it argues that much work still needs to be done before it can be suitable to provide a global framework for evaluating global bioethical issues.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:42:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b73b60b71e6b4a72b88eb7f8257e4161
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2788-7928
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:42:30Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Conversational Society of Philosophy (CSP)
record_format Article
series Arụmarụka
spelling doaj.art-b73b60b71e6b4a72b88eb7f8257e41612024-02-03T08:31:57ZengConversational Society of Philosophy (CSP)Arụmarụka2788-79282023-07-01312550https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajct.v3i1.2An Appraisal of “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”Motsamai MOLEFE0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5030-6222Elphus MUADE1Centre for Leadership Ethics in Africa University of Fort Hare, South AfricaCentre for Leadership Ethics in Africa University of Fort Hare, South AfricaThis paper evaluates Caesar Alimsinya Atuire’s essay “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”. Atuire’s essay aims to contribute to global ethical discourse by articulating a systematic account of an African ethical perspective, specifically focusing on the themes of personhood, moral status and the legal question of abortion. We make three objections against Atuire’s essay. Firstly, we argue that a plausible approach to African personhood must consider both its individualistic and relational features, rather than merely emphasize the relational component. The second objection focuses on the theory of moral status, and it has two parts: (a) we insist that a correct understanding of the concept of moral status must construe it as a moral patiency rather than a moral agency term. We believe that Atuire’s view errs in regarding it as the latter. (b) we argue that contrary to Atuire’s assertions, Thaddeus Metz’s friendliness theory of moral status does a better job than Atuire’s object moral status (OMS) and subject moral status (SMS) views of moral status. The final objection is that maybe before we reflect on the legal status of abortion, as ethicists, we should begin by considering the ethical status of abortion in light of African axiological resources. In the final analysis, the paper appreciates Atuire’s contribution to African ethical theory, but it argues that much work still needs to be done before it can be suitable to provide a global framework for evaluating global bioethical issues.abortionafrican ethicsholismmoral statuspersonhoodrelationality
spellingShingle Motsamai MOLEFE
Elphus MUADE
An Appraisal of “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”
Arụmarụka
abortion
african ethics
holism
moral status
personhood
relationality
title An Appraisal of “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”
title_full An Appraisal of “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”
title_fullStr An Appraisal of “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”
title_full_unstemmed An Appraisal of “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”
title_short An Appraisal of “African Perspectives of Moral Status: A Framework for Evaluating Global Bioethical Issues”
title_sort appraisal of african perspectives of moral status a framework for evaluating global bioethical issues
topic abortion
african ethics
holism
moral status
personhood
relationality
work_keys_str_mv AT motsamaimolefe anappraisalofafricanperspectivesofmoralstatusaframeworkforevaluatingglobalbioethicalissues
AT elphusmuade anappraisalofafricanperspectivesofmoralstatusaframeworkforevaluatingglobalbioethicalissues
AT motsamaimolefe appraisalofafricanperspectivesofmoralstatusaframeworkforevaluatingglobalbioethicalissues
AT elphusmuade appraisalofafricanperspectivesofmoralstatusaframeworkforevaluatingglobalbioethicalissues