Nutrition vs association: plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning alone

Abstract Background While it is known that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve nutrient acquisition and herbivore resistance in crops, the mechanisms by which AMF influence plant defense remain unknown. Plants respond to herbivory with a cascade of gene expression and phytochemical biosyn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chase A. Stratton, Swayamjit Ray, Brosi A. Bradley, Jason P. Kaye, Jared G. Ali, Ebony G. Murrell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-08-01
Series:BMC Plant Biology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03795-3
_version_ 1811340189069475840
author Chase A. Stratton
Swayamjit Ray
Brosi A. Bradley
Jason P. Kaye
Jared G. Ali
Ebony G. Murrell
author_facet Chase A. Stratton
Swayamjit Ray
Brosi A. Bradley
Jason P. Kaye
Jared G. Ali
Ebony G. Murrell
author_sort Chase A. Stratton
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background While it is known that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve nutrient acquisition and herbivore resistance in crops, the mechanisms by which AMF influence plant defense remain unknown. Plants respond to herbivory with a cascade of gene expression and phytochemical biosynthesis. Given that the production of defensive phytochemicals requires nutrients, a commonly invoked hypothesis is that the improvement to plant defense when grown with AMF is simply due to an increased availability of nutrients. An alternative hypothesis is that the AMF effect on herbivory is due to changes in plant defense gene expression that are not simply due to nutrient availability. In this study, we tested whether changes in plant defenses are regulated by nutritional provisioning alone or the response of plant to AMF associations. Maize plants grown with or without AMF and with one of three fertilizer treatments (standard, 2 × nitrogen, or 2 × phosphorous) were infested with fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda; FAW) for 72 h. We measured general plant characteristics (e.g. height, number of leaves), relative gene expression (rtPCR) of three defensive genes (lox3, mpi, and pr5), total plant N and P nutrient content, and change in FAW mass per plant. Results We found that AMF drove the defense response of maize by increasing the expression of mpi and pr5. Furthermore, while AMF increased the total phosphorous content of maize it had no impact on maize nitrogen. Fertilization alone did not alter upregulation of any of the 3 induced defense genes tested, suggesting the mechanism through which AMF upregulate defenses is not solely via increased N or P plant nutrition. Conclusion This work supports that maize defense may be optimized by AMF associations alone, reducing the need for artificial inputs when managing FAW.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:38:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b73e515858fd4748a61b899bbec90293
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2229
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:38:13Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Plant Biology
spelling doaj.art-b73e515858fd4748a61b899bbec902932022-12-22T02:34:49ZengBMCBMC Plant Biology1471-22292022-08-0122111010.1186/s12870-022-03795-3Nutrition vs association: plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning aloneChase A. Stratton0Swayamjit Ray1Brosi A. Bradley2Jason P. Kaye3Jared G. Ali4Ebony G. Murrell5The Land InstituteDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State UniversityDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State UniversityDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State UniversityDepartment of Entomology, Pennsylvania State UniversityThe Land InstituteAbstract Background While it is known that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can improve nutrient acquisition and herbivore resistance in crops, the mechanisms by which AMF influence plant defense remain unknown. Plants respond to herbivory with a cascade of gene expression and phytochemical biosynthesis. Given that the production of defensive phytochemicals requires nutrients, a commonly invoked hypothesis is that the improvement to plant defense when grown with AMF is simply due to an increased availability of nutrients. An alternative hypothesis is that the AMF effect on herbivory is due to changes in plant defense gene expression that are not simply due to nutrient availability. In this study, we tested whether changes in plant defenses are regulated by nutritional provisioning alone or the response of plant to AMF associations. Maize plants grown with or without AMF and with one of three fertilizer treatments (standard, 2 × nitrogen, or 2 × phosphorous) were infested with fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda; FAW) for 72 h. We measured general plant characteristics (e.g. height, number of leaves), relative gene expression (rtPCR) of three defensive genes (lox3, mpi, and pr5), total plant N and P nutrient content, and change in FAW mass per plant. Results We found that AMF drove the defense response of maize by increasing the expression of mpi and pr5. Furthermore, while AMF increased the total phosphorous content of maize it had no impact on maize nitrogen. Fertilization alone did not alter upregulation of any of the 3 induced defense genes tested, suggesting the mechanism through which AMF upregulate defenses is not solely via increased N or P plant nutrition. Conclusion This work supports that maize defense may be optimized by AMF associations alone, reducing the need for artificial inputs when managing FAW.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03795-3Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungiSpodoptera frugiperdaZea maysGene expressionInduced defenseNutrient digests
spellingShingle Chase A. Stratton
Swayamjit Ray
Brosi A. Bradley
Jason P. Kaye
Jared G. Ali
Ebony G. Murrell
Nutrition vs association: plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning alone
BMC Plant Biology
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Spodoptera frugiperda
Zea mays
Gene expression
Induced defense
Nutrient digests
title Nutrition vs association: plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning alone
title_full Nutrition vs association: plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning alone
title_fullStr Nutrition vs association: plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning alone
title_full_unstemmed Nutrition vs association: plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning alone
title_short Nutrition vs association: plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning alone
title_sort nutrition vs association plant defenses are altered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi association not by nutritional provisioning alone
topic Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Spodoptera frugiperda
Zea mays
Gene expression
Induced defense
Nutrient digests
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03795-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chaseastratton nutritionvsassociationplantdefensesarealteredbyarbuscularmycorrhizalfungiassociationnotbynutritionalprovisioningalone
AT swayamjitray nutritionvsassociationplantdefensesarealteredbyarbuscularmycorrhizalfungiassociationnotbynutritionalprovisioningalone
AT brosiabradley nutritionvsassociationplantdefensesarealteredbyarbuscularmycorrhizalfungiassociationnotbynutritionalprovisioningalone
AT jasonpkaye nutritionvsassociationplantdefensesarealteredbyarbuscularmycorrhizalfungiassociationnotbynutritionalprovisioningalone
AT jaredgali nutritionvsassociationplantdefensesarealteredbyarbuscularmycorrhizalfungiassociationnotbynutritionalprovisioningalone
AT ebonygmurrell nutritionvsassociationplantdefensesarealteredbyarbuscularmycorrhizalfungiassociationnotbynutritionalprovisioningalone