The gambler's fallacy in retrospect
Oppenheimer and Monin (2009) recently found that subjectively rare events are taken to indicate a longer preceding sequence of unobserved trials than subjectively common events, an effect which they refer to as the retrospective gambler's fallacy. The current paper extends this idea to the situ...
Main Author: | William J. Matthews |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2010-04-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/10/10319/jdm10319.pdf |
Similar Items
-
The gambler’s fallacy in retrospect: A supplementary comment on Oppenheimer and Monin (2009)
by: William J. Matthews
Published: (2010-04-01) -
The retrospective gambler’s fallacy: Unlikely events, constructing the past, and multiple universes
by: Daniel M. Oppenheimer, et al.
Published: (2009-08-01) -
Gambler's fallacy, hot hand belief, and the time of patterns
by: Hongbin Wang, et al.
Published: (2010-04-01) -
Gambler’s fallacy, hot hand belief, and the time of patterns
by: Yanlong Sun, et al.
Published: (2010-04-01) -
Number preferences
in lotteries
by: Tong V. Wang, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01)