The correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school student

This study aims to determine the correlation between ability of scientific argumentation and learning outcomes of students on the virus topic with the research subjects were X IPA students in SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara 2018/2019 (n = 47). This type of research is quantitative descriptive with the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V Vera, Yenny Anwar, E Ermayanti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Negeri Jakarta 2021-04-01
Series:Biosfer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/biosfer/article/view/10998
_version_ 1797272373283520512
author V Vera
Yenny Anwar
E Ermayanti
author_facet V Vera
Yenny Anwar
E Ermayanti
author_sort V Vera
collection DOAJ
description This study aims to determine the correlation between ability of scientific argumentation and learning outcomes of students on the virus topic with the research subjects were X IPA students in SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara 2018/2019 (n = 47). This type of research is quantitative descriptive with the correlation method. This study used two data collection techniques is written test and observation. The result showed that students learning was 49% very good, 15% good, 17% sufficient, and 19% less. The results of writing scientific argumentation of students are 9% excellent, 11% good, 21% sufficient, 26% less, and 33% very poor. The average scientific argumentation of students based on Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) is 100% of students able to submit a claim, 5% able to submit data, 77% able to convey a warrant, 6% able to convey backing, 7% able to convey rebuttal and 3% able to convey qualifer with the quality of scientific argumentation in general at level 2. The results of the correlation test of scientific argumentation include writing argumentation and TAP with learning outcomes is 0,311 it is means a low correlation. Based on the results showed a correlation between the ability of scientific argumentation with learning outcomes of class x students in SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:27:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b75d4e0259be49d095a687c06c46d21b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0853-2451
2614-3984
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:27:22Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Universitas Negeri Jakarta
record_format Article
series Biosfer
spelling doaj.art-b75d4e0259be49d095a687c06c46d21b2024-03-06T05:32:32ZengUniversitas Negeri JakartaBiosfer0853-24512614-39842021-04-01141546410.21009/biosferjpb.1099810998The correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school studentV Vera0Yenny Anwar1E Ermayanti2Biology Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Universitas SriwijayaBiology Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Universitas SriwijayaBiology Education, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Universitas Sriwijaya, IndonesiaThis study aims to determine the correlation between ability of scientific argumentation and learning outcomes of students on the virus topic with the research subjects were X IPA students in SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara 2018/2019 (n = 47). This type of research is quantitative descriptive with the correlation method. This study used two data collection techniques is written test and observation. The result showed that students learning was 49% very good, 15% good, 17% sufficient, and 19% less. The results of writing scientific argumentation of students are 9% excellent, 11% good, 21% sufficient, 26% less, and 33% very poor. The average scientific argumentation of students based on Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) is 100% of students able to submit a claim, 5% able to submit data, 77% able to convey a warrant, 6% able to convey backing, 7% able to convey rebuttal and 3% able to convey qualifer with the quality of scientific argumentation in general at level 2. The results of the correlation test of scientific argumentation include writing argumentation and TAP with learning outcomes is 0,311 it is means a low correlation. Based on the results showed a correlation between the ability of scientific argumentation with learning outcomes of class x students in SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya Utarahttps://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/biosfer/article/view/10998scientific argumentationbiology learning outcomesviruses
spellingShingle V Vera
Yenny Anwar
E Ermayanti
The correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school student
Biosfer
scientific argumentation
biology learning outcomes
viruses
title The correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school student
title_full The correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school student
title_fullStr The correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school student
title_full_unstemmed The correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school student
title_short The correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school student
title_sort correlation between scientific argumentation with viruses learning outcomes of senior high school student
topic scientific argumentation
biology learning outcomes
viruses
url https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/biosfer/article/view/10998
work_keys_str_mv AT vvera thecorrelationbetweenscientificargumentationwithviruseslearningoutcomesofseniorhighschoolstudent
AT yennyanwar thecorrelationbetweenscientificargumentationwithviruseslearningoutcomesofseniorhighschoolstudent
AT eermayanti thecorrelationbetweenscientificargumentationwithviruseslearningoutcomesofseniorhighschoolstudent
AT vvera correlationbetweenscientificargumentationwithviruseslearningoutcomesofseniorhighschoolstudent
AT yennyanwar correlationbetweenscientificargumentationwithviruseslearningoutcomesofseniorhighschoolstudent
AT eermayanti correlationbetweenscientificargumentationwithviruseslearningoutcomesofseniorhighschoolstudent