Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?

The goal of this paper is to figure out whether Aristotle’s response to the argument for fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 is a success. By “response” it is meant not simply the reasons Aristotle offers to highlight why fatalism does not accord with how we conduct our lives, but also the solution he...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. A. Istvan Jr.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2014-08-01
Series:Ideas y Valores
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/33178/46189
_version_ 1818942520326881280
author M. A. Istvan Jr.
author_facet M. A. Istvan Jr.
author_sort M. A. Istvan Jr.
collection DOAJ
description The goal of this paper is to figure out whether Aristotle’s response to the argument for fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 is a success. By “response” it is meant not simply the reasons Aristotle offers to highlight why fatalism does not accord with how we conduct our lives, but also the solution he devises to block the argument for fatalism. This paper finds that a) Aristotle’s argument for fatalism is essentially bivalence plus that the truth of a proposition implies necessity, b) that Aristotle’s solution is to restrict bivalence, c) that this solution is coherent, and d) that while this solution does not rule out the possibility of fatalism, it does succeed in blocking the argument for fatalism offered within chapter 9.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T07:12:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-b7657741fd324e81aab200b3ab547be7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0120-0062
0120-0062
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T07:12:44Z
publishDate 2014-08-01
publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia
record_format Article
series Ideas y Valores
spelling doaj.art-b7657741fd324e81aab200b3ab547be72022-12-21T19:48:52ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaIdeas y Valores0120-00620120-00622014-08-01631553158Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?M. A. Istvan Jr. 0Texas A&M UniversityThe goal of this paper is to figure out whether Aristotle’s response to the argument for fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 is a success. By “response” it is meant not simply the reasons Aristotle offers to highlight why fatalism does not accord with how we conduct our lives, but also the solution he devises to block the argument for fatalism. This paper finds that a) Aristotle’s argument for fatalism is essentially bivalence plus that the truth of a proposition implies necessity, b) that Aristotle’s solution is to restrict bivalence, c) that this solution is coherent, and d) that while this solution does not rule out the possibility of fatalism, it does succeed in blocking the argument for fatalism offered within chapter 9.http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/33178/46189Aristotlefatalism.
spellingShingle M. A. Istvan Jr.
Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
Ideas y Valores
Aristotle
fatalism.
title Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
title_full Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
title_fullStr Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
title_full_unstemmed Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
title_short Is Aristotle’s Response to the Argument for Fatalism in De Interpretatione 9 Successful?
title_sort is aristotle s response to the argument for fatalism in de interpretatione 9 successful
topic Aristotle
fatalism.
url http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/idval/article/view/33178/46189
work_keys_str_mv AT maistvanjr isaristotlesresponsetotheargumentforfatalismindeinterpretatione9successful